Barbella
Senator
when he announced he wouldn't recommend criminal charges against Clinton for violating email rules and lying repeatedly about it? (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA) He said "no rational prosecutor" would bring such a case, even though no rational judge would quash an indictment under Section 793(f) of the Espionage Act based on the facts he alleged.
My theory is that Comey was placed in an impossible position by the June 27 Phoenix tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a meeting that was surely intended to be secret and which was revealed apparently because a TV reporter had a good source in the private jet terminal.
By meeting with the spouse of a candidate under criminal investigation, Lynch revealed herself to be a political hack. Justice Department refusal to summon a grand jury and sweetheart deals with key witnesses strengthen that view.
So Comey, head of an investigative agency, was obliged to make a decision that would ordinarily be made by a prosecutor. Like a local judge asked to enjoin a party's national convention delegates, he evidently didn't consider it his job to determine who should be a presidential nominee.
Team Clinton cheered that violation of "protocol." The October 28 letter required a "1984"-style flip-flop: we have always been at war with the "protocol"-violating James Comey.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/is-team-clinton-booting-the-election/article/2606318
My theory is that Comey was placed in an impossible position by the June 27 Phoenix tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a meeting that was surely intended to be secret and which was revealed apparently because a TV reporter had a good source in the private jet terminal.
By meeting with the spouse of a candidate under criminal investigation, Lynch revealed herself to be a political hack. Justice Department refusal to summon a grand jury and sweetheart deals with key witnesses strengthen that view.
So Comey, head of an investigative agency, was obliged to make a decision that would ordinarily be made by a prosecutor. Like a local judge asked to enjoin a party's national convention delegates, he evidently didn't consider it his job to determine who should be a presidential nominee.
Team Clinton cheered that violation of "protocol." The October 28 letter required a "1984"-style flip-flop: we have always been at war with the "protocol"-violating James Comey.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/is-team-clinton-booting-the-election/article/2606318
