reason10
Governor
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/1...igator-signage-after-attack.html?intcmp=hpbt3
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/1...igator-signage-after-attack.html?intcmp=hpbt3
A Disney official said Wednesday the company plans to “thoroughly review” its alligator warning signage around a resort where a 2-year-old boy was killed by a reptile that snatched him out of shallow water.
Are you [Unwelcome language removed] me? This is going to be the lawsuit of the century. That couple from Nebraska is going to wind up OWNING the Disney Grand Floridian Resort before this is over. And here's why:
1. It is ILLEGAL to feed an alligator in the wild. This is because even ONE feeding creates a nuisance alligator.
2. It is a fallacy that feeding an alligator causes it to lose its fear of humans. An alligator brain is about the size of a lima bean. (Kinda like the average liberal Democrat voter). It doesn't know about fear. It doesn't know anger. It just knows FOOD. And it remembers a food source along with the time of that food source. Alligators do not just come out and snatch up little dogs or little kids standing on the land unless they were fed earlier and have come to expect a feeding at that same spot.
3. Once a nuisance alligator has been created, it has to be removed from the spot where it comes in contact with humans. It either has to be relocated to an alligator preserve, maybe the middle of the Everglades, or it has to be killed. It has been programmed with a feeding impulse and it's just too dangerous to be left in the canal, or the lake, or the river where there are houses owned by humans. (Oh, and a non-nuisance alligator is also very dangerous if you go hunting it in the wilds, especially if you find a gator den.)
4. The fact that Disney had to put up a sign warning about alligators means the company had constructive knowledge of nuisance alligators. A first year law student wouldn't have to work very hard to win a billion dollars in that kind of a negligence lawsuit. And if Disney's execs have any brains whatsoever, they'll hire professional trappers to clear out ALL alligators from the resorts where their hotels come in contact with the water.
This never should have happened. That child's parents were paying a fortune to stay at that resort. It wasn't their kid's fault that he got snatched by that gator. There was no contributory negligence on the part of the parents. The Disney company has unlimited amounts of money. They could have made that area safe. And now it's going to cost them millions of dollars.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/1...igator-signage-after-attack.html?intcmp=hpbt3
A Disney official said Wednesday the company plans to “thoroughly review” its alligator warning signage around a resort where a 2-year-old boy was killed by a reptile that snatched him out of shallow water.
Are you [Unwelcome language removed] me? This is going to be the lawsuit of the century. That couple from Nebraska is going to wind up OWNING the Disney Grand Floridian Resort before this is over. And here's why:
1. It is ILLEGAL to feed an alligator in the wild. This is because even ONE feeding creates a nuisance alligator.
2. It is a fallacy that feeding an alligator causes it to lose its fear of humans. An alligator brain is about the size of a lima bean. (Kinda like the average liberal Democrat voter). It doesn't know about fear. It doesn't know anger. It just knows FOOD. And it remembers a food source along with the time of that food source. Alligators do not just come out and snatch up little dogs or little kids standing on the land unless they were fed earlier and have come to expect a feeding at that same spot.
3. Once a nuisance alligator has been created, it has to be removed from the spot where it comes in contact with humans. It either has to be relocated to an alligator preserve, maybe the middle of the Everglades, or it has to be killed. It has been programmed with a feeding impulse and it's just too dangerous to be left in the canal, or the lake, or the river where there are houses owned by humans. (Oh, and a non-nuisance alligator is also very dangerous if you go hunting it in the wilds, especially if you find a gator den.)
4. The fact that Disney had to put up a sign warning about alligators means the company had constructive knowledge of nuisance alligators. A first year law student wouldn't have to work very hard to win a billion dollars in that kind of a negligence lawsuit. And if Disney's execs have any brains whatsoever, they'll hire professional trappers to clear out ALL alligators from the resorts where their hotels come in contact with the water.
This never should have happened. That child's parents were paying a fortune to stay at that resort. It wasn't their kid's fault that he got snatched by that gator. There was no contributory negligence on the part of the parents. The Disney company has unlimited amounts of money. They could have made that area safe. And now it's going to cost them millions of dollars.