New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Does Anybody See The IRONY HERE?

Sleeper Cell

Sleeper Cell

Council Member
I cannot help but to.LAUGH.MY ASS OFF

During the entire BUSH ADMINISTRATION all we heard about was UNJUST WAR and BUSHES WAR CRIMES

Now fast forward to 2013 and when their TOKEN GOD barrack obama is in office they are CLAMORING for WAR om Syria and LIBS are demanding OBAMA commit WAR CRIMES

Om the OTHERSIDE rePUBICans are acting like abunch of HIPPIES and PROTESTING war with Syria but when but when BUSH was in office they couldnt expand Iraq and Afghanistan wars fast enough

DOES anybody see the IRONY here?
 
Kinda like how Bush was spying on Americans and along comes Barry spying on steroids and all of a sudden, it's all cool because we have a black president.
 
Sleeper Cell said:
I cannot help but to.LAUGH.MY ASS OFF

During the entire BUSH ADMINISTRATION all we heard about was UNJUST WAR and BUSHES WAR CRIMES

Now fast forward to 2013 and when their TOKEN GOD barrack obama is in office they are CLAMORING for WAR om Syria and LIBS are demanding OBAMA commit WAR CRIMES

Om the OTHERSIDE rePUBICans are acting like abunch of HIPPIES and PROTESTING war with Syria but when but when BUSH was in office they couldnt expand Iraq and Afghanistan wars fast enough

DOES anybody see the IRONY here?
Click to expand...
hi, retard. Who is 'clamoring for war with Syria'?
 
Last edited:
Yuri Zhivago said:
hi, retard. Who is 'clamoring for war with Syria'?
Click to expand...
Well "Einstein" allow me to SPELL IT OUT 4 YA

You liberals are BEHIND OBAMA on this MISSLE ATTACK on SYRIA which is an ACT OF WAR and has the POTENTIAL.to draw Iran, Lebannon, and Israel.into the fray

DO YA FOLLOW ME
 
Sleeper Cell said:
Well "Einstein" allow me to SPELL IT OUT 4 YA

You liberals are BEHIND OBAMA on this MISSLE ATTACK on SYRIA which is an ACT OF WAR and has the POTENTIAL.to draw Iran, Lebannon, and Israel.into the fray

DO YA FOLLOW ME
Click to expand...

No, actually most of us are against an attack on Syria. You're new here (supposedly) and should probably hang around a bit before making any more dumb proclamations.
 
Bo-4 said:
No, actually most of us are against an attack on Syria. You're new here (supposedly) and should probably hang around a bit before making any more dumb proclamations.
Click to expand...
Why so I can be like everybody else and reply with CANNED TALKING POINTS

No thanks I prefer raw human emotion thats what makes it REALLY INTERESTING
 
Bo-4 said:
No, actually most of us are against an attack on Syria. You're new here (supposedly) and should probably hang around a bit before making any more dumb proclamations.
Click to expand...


Poll number seem to back up your assertion. The President's position on this issue is not the popular position. Doesn't make him right or wrong, just not in agreement with the majority (if you accept the poll numbers).
 
Zam-Zam said:
Poll number seem to back up your assertion. The President's position on this issue is not the popular position. Doesn't make him right or wrong, just not in agreement with the majority (if you accept the poll numbers).
Click to expand...

Yep, 80% opposes last poll i saw and it was about even on those for intervention between Ds and Rs.
 
Sleeper Cell said:
Why so I can be like everybody else and reply with CANNED TALKING POINTS

No thanks I prefer raw human emotion thats what makes it REALLY INTERESTING
Click to expand...

Please find me a single Lefty here in PJ advocating intervention in Syria.

You can't, so you'll keep saying dumb stuff.
 
Bo-4 said:
Please find me a single Lefty here in PJ advocating intervention in Syria.

You can't, so you'll keep saying dumb stuff.
Click to expand...
I dunno Bugsy Mkgurk n JuilieFronOhio just to name afew and I can provide more

NoW you can MOVE ON.and prattle your LAME canned TALKING POINTS elsewhere
 
Bo-4 said:
Provide links to such claims or STFU.

Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
I dont know how to link but you KNOW DAMN WELL these THREADS EXIST so STFU

Why dont ya quit being such a LAZY **** and LOOK

Here Ill bump em to the top MINNIMAL EFFORT on your part
 
Sleeper Cell said:
I cannot help but to.LAUGH.MY ASS OFF

During the entire BUSH ADMINISTRATION all we heard about was UNJUST WAR and BUSHES WAR CRIMES

Now fast forward to 2013 and when their TOKEN GOD barrack obama is in office they are CLAMORING for WAR om Syria and LIBS are demanding OBAMA commit WAR CRIMES

Om the OTHERSIDE rePUBICans are acting like abunch of HIPPIES and PROTESTING war with Syria but when but when BUSH was in office they couldnt expand Iraq and Afghanistan wars fast enough

DOES anybody see the IRONY here?
Click to expand...

It would be ironic if the Republican and Democratic positions on Syria were the reverse of their positions on Iraq.

If the polling was correct (Pew), Republicans supported an attack on Syria by 56-44. Democrats, by contrast opposed an attack 54-46. These numbers were recorded in April after the first chemical attack happened.

Today, according to NBC, and after the sarin attack in Syria on 8-21-13, just 41% of Republicans support a strike and 49% oppose a strike. Democratic support remains at what it was last April, 46% of Democrats favor a strike against Syria.

In the wind up to the war in Iraq, Congressional Republicans overwhelmingly supported invading Iraq by a 263-7 majority (House: 215-6 in favor; Senate: 48-1 in favor; total = 263-7 in favor). Congressional Democrats opposed the Iraq War Resolution 147-110 (House: 126-81 opposed; Senate: 29-21 in favor; total = 147-110 opposed)

If comparing the stand of Republicans and Democrats on the 2002 Iraq War Resolution to the upcoming 2013 vote on a strike on Syria is an indicator of irony or a double standard, then it's the Republicans who got ironed and doubled up, and only after the mass sarin attack on 8-21-13!
 
Last edited:
Sleeper Cell said:
I dont know how to link but you KNOW DAMN WELL these THREADS EXIST so STFU

Why dont ya quit being such a LAZY **** and LOOK

Here Ill bump em to the top MINNIMAL EFFORT on your part
Click to expand...

Well, there are 157 responses in this thread.. and not a single Dem supports the action. Precious few Rs supporting either. But as we know, most of them would oppose anything Obama wanted to do.

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/for-or-against-military-intervention-in-syria.57307/

Again, more research and less assumptive spouting would serve you well.
 
Bo-4 said:
Well, there are 157 responses in this thread.. and not a single Dem supports the action. Precious few Rs supporting either. But as we know, most of them would oppose anything Obama wanted to do.

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/for-or-against-military-intervention-in-syria.57307/

Again, more research and less assumptive spouting would serve you well.
Click to expand...
I never MENTINED that thread but if youd like I will go arouund the back pages find every lefty supporting post and MENTION @Bo-4 as the LINK
 
Sleeper Cell said:
I never MENTINED that thread but if youd like I will go arouund the back pages find every lefty supporting post and MENTION @Bo-4 as the LINK
Click to expand...

You've already failed with Bugsy. We think it's funny that Republicans whine about attacking and then they whine about NOT attacking.

No matter what Obama does, they will whine (and we will continue to laugh ;-)
 
Bo-4 said:
You've already failed with Bugsy. We think it's funny that Republicans whine about attacking and then they whine about NOT attacking.

No matter what Obama does, they will whine (and we will continue to laugh ;-)
Click to expand...
I aint no [Unwelcome language removed] rePUBICan dumb@$$

I vote LIBERTARIAN ya dink
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top