New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Election Fraud Gone Wild - Courts Will Stop It

Democrats thought they could impose unprecedented levels of election fraud on our 2020 election, and get away with it. Many in the leftist media are foolishly denying it has occured, when multiple cases galore are showing on internet videos, and massive amounts of Biden vote counts have been suddenly appeared out of nowhere, in a number of states, changing big Trump leads into losses for him. Nothing could have been more obvious. It looks like Democrats weren't even trying to hide it.

Fortunately, Trump lawyer are already on top of all this lunacy, with lawsuits filed in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and a recount in Wisconsin. Arizona and Virginia, are also being challenged. Instances of election fraud are all over the place. In one case, in Luzerne County, PA, 9 military ballots (all voting for Trump) were found discarded., and the DOJ/FBI are already on the case.


Some might say what’s the big deal – it’s just 9 ballots. Note that the statement indicates that it is 9 ballots “at this time,” indicating that the investigation is still ongoing. Also note that we are very early on in the early voting process, with hundreds of thousands more votes to be cast by mail in Pennsylvania.

With the Pennsylvania courts having recently ruled that the Democrats can continue collecting ballots for days after Election Day – a decision the state GOP has appealed to the federal courts – and with millions of ballots having been mailed to people who did not request them, the state’s voting process is almost certain to be rife with fraud and abuse. What the DOJ/FBI discovered in this situation is no doubt the result of Democrat officials conducting a trial run to see what they can get away with as the process plays itself out.

The PA supreme court made a decision to allow ballots to be submitted without signatures, without dates, and in a slipshod fashion that appears to be an invitation to fraud. This is unconstututional in itself , since the US constitution mandates that only state legislatures can determine voting procedures. On thi lone, Pennsylvania's whole election will be overturned in the courts.

The Democrat Party is mounting a highly-organized effort to steal this election. What we see here is just the tip of a very large iceberg. The good news is that William Barr’s DOJ appears intent on policing the situation. Check the links for videos of shameless Democrats thinking they can do anything they want with our democracy, as long as it helps their candidate. Incredible audacity and stupidity.

Some might say what’s the big deal – it’s just nine ballots. Note that the statement indicates that it is 9 ballots “at this time,” indicating that the investigation is still ongoing. Also note that we are very early on in the early voting process, with hundreds of thousands more votes to be cast by mail in Pennsylvania.

With the Pennsylvania courts having recently ruled that the Democrats can continue collecting ballots for days after Election Day – a decision the state GOP has appealed to the federal courts – and with millions of ballots having been mailed to people who did not request them, the state’s voting process is almost certain to be rife with fraud and abuse. What the DOJ/FBI discovered in this situation is no doubt the result of Democrat officials conducting a trial run to see what they can get away with as the process plays itself out.

The Democrat Party is mounting a highly-organized effort to steal this election. What we see here is just the tip of a very large iceberg. The good news is that William Barr’s DOJ appears intent on policing the situation.

Types of Voter Fraud

Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots

Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either filling it in directly and forging the voter’s signature or illegally telling the voter who to vote for.

Ineligible Voting
Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S. citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.

Impersonation Fraud At The Polls
Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who have died, moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons, but remain registered.

Buying Votes
Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for a particular candidate.

Ballot Petition Fraud
Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot petitions that must be filed with election officials in some states for a candidate or issue to be listed on the official ballot

Duplicate Voting
Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same election in more than one jurisdiction or state.

False Registrations
Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a phony name and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live and is not entitled to vote.

Altering The Vote Count
Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the central location where votes are counted.

Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls
Forcing or intimidating voters—particularly the elderly, disabled, illiterate, and those for whom English is a second language—to vote for particular candidates while supposedly providing them with “assistance.”


The Heritage Foundation maintains a database of hundreds of cases of voter fraud (by no means does it cover all). One can click on a state on the map and see individual cases with names of defendants, the type of fraud charges against them, and a detailed description.



In Texas, four people, including a Gregg County commissioner, were arrested last month in connection with their alleged involvement in a vote-harvesting scheme that was uncovered by the state Attorney General’s Office.



Another case out of the Lone Star State involves a mayoral candidate for the city of Carrollton. Zul Mirza Mohamed is alleged to have forged at least 84 voter registration forms for unwitting residents of Denton County, and then obtained absentee ballots in their names without their knowledge using a virtual mailbox and a false identity.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office states that at the time of his arrest, Mohamed was completing more fraudulent mail-in ballot applications.

This is only part of the OP (message came up not allowing post with mire than 10,000 characters) continued in the posts >
 
Here's a video on Republican poll watchers being denied access to the vote counting tables. Incredible! >>

Watch how Gary Feldman, a Republican poll watcher, with Philadelphia city certificate, is denied entrance to the building to do his job, by Democrat fraudsters. And listen how they tell him to call the police. Oh yeah right, in a city with a Democrat mayor. We've seen how that goes >>


In one of Joe Biden's typically bizarre video gaffes, he openly admits that >> “We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” he said. Don't believe he said that ?

Watch him say it on the video >>
https://pjmedia.com/election/victor...lection-heading-to-the-supreme-court-n1124283

There are also multiple reports of problems being caused by election officials using inaccurate, error-filled voter registration lists to mail out absentee ballots.

Those include:

A German journalist who reports that he received three ballots at his residence in Washington, D.C., for the previous tenant, who moved five years ago; the landlady, who now lives in Puerto Rico; and the landlady’s deceased husband.

New Jersey residents across the state reporting that they have received absentee ballots for their deceased relatives.

Clerical errors that sent 1,400 Virginia voters two mail-in ballots for the general election.

Close to 100,000 New York City voters receiving mail-in ballots with incorrect names and addresses.

An acquaintance of one of the writers living in Washington, D.C., who received five ballots in the mail—two for him, one for his roommate, and two for individuals who haven’t lived at his address for years. Those ballots can be seen here:

This summary of recent cases doesn’t even cover the 1,000 voters referred to law enforcement officials in Georgia for voting twice in that state’s June primary (once in person and a second time with an absentee ballot); or the former Democratic congressman and erstwhile political consultant indicted in Philadelphia on charges of bribing an election official to stuff the ballot box with fraudulent votes in multiple elections; or the illegal aliens indicted in North Carolina for illegally registering and voting.
 
There is no fraud happening. The lawsuits will all fail.

WOW.

A poster goes through all the effort to search the web to provide, (what they think even if others may not), is proof or evidence of all the things they say in not just 1, but 2, posts full of information, ALL rebuked by another with a simple, but heartfelt;

"NA-UA"





Just............ Damn.

May as well just lock the thread down now for there is no come back to that, there is no retort to a good 'ol, "NA-UA".

Game, set and match. Well played. Well played indeed.
 
WOW.

A poster goes through all the effort to search the web to provide, (what they think even if others may not), is proof or evidence of all the things they say in not just 1, but 2, posts full of information, ALL rebuked by another with a simple, but heartfelt;

"NA-UA"





Just............ Damn.

May as well just lock the thread down now for there is no come back to that, there is no retort to a good 'ol, "NA-UA".

Game, set and match. Well played. Well played indeed.
Here. Let's throw some in from Redstate.com . Bon Appetit!



 
Here. Let's throw some in from Redstate.com . Bon Appetit!



Correct...there is no widespread voter fraud.
 
Here. Let's throw some in from Redstate.com . Bon Appetit!





Oh dear lord...……...

First things first, I intended no offense. I was merely pointing out how it is usually a good thing to discredit something another posts by posting something you feel will do just that. Or perhaps by pointing out things within their links that do not exactly support what the poster believes. Things like that tend to provide better interaction, debate, even discord and arguing.

When one resorts to a "NA-UA" retort right off the bat nothing more need be said.

That was all I wanted to point out, I made no comment about the content of either posts so I may have shared the view of either of you, I just wanted the "debat" to carry on.

Sorry if it came off as something different.
 
Here's a video on Republican poll watchers being denied access to the vote counting tables. Incredible! >>

Watch how Gary Feldman, a Republican poll watcher, with Philadelphia city certificate, is denied entrance to the building to do his job, by Democrat fraudsters. And listen how they tell him to call the police. Oh yeah right, in a city with a Democrat mayor. We've seen how that goes >>


In one of Joe Biden's typically bizarre video gaffes, he openly admits that >> “We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” he said. Don't believe he said that ?

Watch him say it on the video >>
https://pjmedia.com/election/victor...lection-heading-to-the-supreme-court-n1124283

There are also multiple reports of problems being caused by election officials using inaccurate, error-filled voter registration lists to mail out absentee ballots.

Those include:

A German journalist who reports that he received three ballots at his residence in Washington, D.C., for the previous tenant, who moved five years ago; the landlady, who now lives in Puerto Rico; and the landlady’s deceased husband.

New Jersey residents across the state reporting that they have received absentee ballots for their deceased relatives.

Clerical errors that sent 1,400 Virginia voters two mail-in ballots for the general election.

Close to 100,000 New York City voters receiving mail-in ballots with incorrect names and addresses.

An acquaintance of one of the writers living in Washington, D.C., who received five ballots in the mail—two for him, one for his roommate, and two for individuals who haven’t lived at his address for years. Those ballots can be seen here:

This summary of recent cases doesn’t even cover the 1,000 voters referred to law enforcement officials in Georgia for voting twice in that state’s June primary (once in person and a second time with an absentee ballot); or the former Democratic congressman and erstwhile political consultant indicted in Philadelphia on charges of bribing an election official to stuff the ballot box with fraudulent votes in multiple elections; or the illegal aliens indicted in North Carolina for illegally registering and voting.
 
Did you take a peek at the sources in the OP? Gateway Pundit? Heritage Foundation? Daily Caller? Daily Signal (a subsidiary of the Heritage Foundation)? Notice a pattern there?


I did.

As far as a pattern goes, yes, that is quite apparent as well. Still, whenever I, this is just me remember, notice such patterns in what, to me, are all lefty sources, I try to use what is written in the linked to articles to show they are inaccurate or even say things that do not support something the poster is saying.

I find it difficult to believe there are people who refuse to believe anything they do not get from a favorite source. If we read on every one of these "suspect" sources but not on cnn or mspms, whatever source is "acceptable", that fire is hot or water is wet some would simply refuse to believe it and stick their face in a fire because they simply refused to believe what they read.

While I do accept the fact that there are some among us who simply refuse to accept anything the read if it comes from a source they refuse to accept, I just didn't think you were among them.

These things are good to know.
 
I did.

As far as a pattern goes, yes, that is quite apparent as well. Still, whenever I, this is just me remember, notice such patterns in what, to me, are all lefty sources, I try to use what is written in the linked to articles to show they are inaccurate or even say things that do not support something the poster is saying.

I find it difficult to believe there are people who refuse to believe anything they do not get from a favorite source. If we read on every one of these "suspect" sources but not on cnn or mspms, whatever source is "acceptable", that fire is hot or water is wet some would simply refuse to believe it and stick their face in a fire because they simply refused to believe what they read.

While I do accept the fact that there are some among us who simply refuse to accept anything the read if it comes from a source they refuse to accept, I just didn't think you were among them.

These things are good to know.
If I may paraphrase; you see no difference between Gate Way Pundit and the Wall Street Journl?
 
If I may paraphrase; you see no difference between Gate Way Pundit and the Wall Street Journl?

Not exactly, but very close.

I see no value in dismissing something as incorrect or a lie based upon where it was stated, be it in Gate Way Pundit or the Wall Street Journal.

I understand that people typically approve of one source or another based upon how much the agree with the majority of the content each source puts out to be seen.

I also understand that there are sources interested in promoting one position or another on any given manner with no desire to promote any opposing views. Therefore I personally would never expect promoting a left leaning position on a right leaning source or promoting a right leaning position on a left leaning source.

But I read them and do not just refuse to see something based upon where it is presented.

But again, I understand that is just ME.
 
Democrats thought they could impose unprecedented levels of election fraud on our 2020 election, and get away with it. Many in the leftist media are foolishly denying it has occured, when multiple cases galore are showing on internet videos, and massive amounts of Biden vote counts have been suddenly appeared out of nowhere, in a number of states, changing big Trump leads into losses for him. Nothing could have been more obvious. It looks like Democrats weren't even trying to hide it.

Fortunately, Trump lawyer are already on top of all this lunacy, with lawsuits filed in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and a recount in Wisconsin. Arizona and Virginia, are also being challenged. Instances of election fraud are all over the place. In one case, in Luzerne County, PA, 9 military ballots (all voting for Trump) were found discarded., and the DOJ/FBI are already on the case.


Some might say what’s the big deal – it’s just 9 ballots. Note that the statement indicates that it is 9 ballots “at this time,” indicating that the investigation is still ongoing. Also note that we are very early on in the early voting process, with hundreds of thousands more votes to be cast by mail in Pennsylvania.

With the Pennsylvania courts having recently ruled that the Democrats can continue collecting ballots for days after Election Day – a decision the state GOP has appealed to the federal courts – and with millions of ballots having been mailed to people who did not request them, the state’s voting process is almost certain to be rife with fraud and abuse. What the DOJ/FBI discovered in this situation is no doubt the result of Democrat officials conducting a trial run to see what they can get away with as the process plays itself out.

The PA supreme court made a decision to allow ballots to be submitted without signatures, without dates, and in a slipshod fashion that appears to be an invitation to fraud. This is unconstututional in itself , since the US constitution mandates that only state legislatures can determine voting procedures. On thi lone, Pennsylvania's whole election will be overturned in the courts.

The Democrat Party is mounting a highly-organized effort to steal this election. What we see here is just the tip of a very large iceberg. The good news is that William Barr’s DOJ appears intent on policing the situation. Check the links for videos of shameless Democrats thinking they can do anything they want with our democracy, as long as it helps their candidate. Incredible audacity and stupidity.

Some might say what’s the big deal – it’s just nine ballots. Note that the statement indicates that it is 9 ballots “at this time,” indicating that the investigation is still ongoing. Also note that we are very early on in the early voting process, with hundreds of thousands more votes to be cast by mail in Pennsylvania.

With the Pennsylvania courts having recently ruled that the Democrats can continue collecting ballots for days after Election Day – a decision the state GOP has appealed to the federal courts – and with millions of ballots having been mailed to people who did not request them, the state’s voting process is almost certain to be rife with fraud and abuse. What the DOJ/FBI discovered in this situation is no doubt the result of Democrat officials conducting a trial run to see what they can get away with as the process plays itself out.

The Democrat Party is mounting a highly-organized effort to steal this election. What we see here is just the tip of a very large iceberg. The good news is that William Barr’s DOJ appears intent on policing the situation.

Types of Voter Fraud

Fraudulent Use Of Absentee Ballots

Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either filling it in directly and forging the voter’s signature or illegally telling the voter who to vote for.

Ineligible Voting
Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S. citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.

Impersonation Fraud At The Polls
Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who have died, moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons, but remain registered.

Buying Votes
Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for a particular candidate.

Ballot Petition Fraud
Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot petitions that must be filed with election officials in some states for a candidate or issue to be listed on the official ballot

Duplicate Voting
Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same election in more than one jurisdiction or state.

False Registrations
Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a phony name and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live and is not entitled to vote.

Altering The Vote Count
Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the central location where votes are counted.

Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls
Forcing or intimidating voters—particularly the elderly, disabled, illiterate, and those for whom English is a second language—to vote for particular candidates while supposedly providing them with “assistance.”


The Heritage Foundation maintains a database of hundreds of cases of voter fraud (by no means does it cover all). One can click on a state on the map and see individual cases with names of defendants, the type of fraud charges against them, and a detailed description.



In Texas, four people, including a Gregg County commissioner, were arrested last month in connection with their alleged involvement in a vote-harvesting scheme that was uncovered by the state Attorney General’s Office.



Another case out of the Lone Star State involves a mayoral candidate for the city of Carrollton. Zul Mirza Mohamed is alleged to have forged at least 84 voter registration forms for unwitting residents of Denton County, and then obtained absentee ballots in their names without their knowledge using a virtual mailbox and a false identity.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office states that at the time of his arrest, Mohamed was completing more fraudulent mail-in ballot applications.

This is only part of the OP (message came up not allowing post with mire than 10,000 characters) continued in the posts >
So what exactly ?
Trump wants a recount in Texas ?

I am sure Biden won't have a problem with it.
 
No but some low hanging fruit being harvested........

Now I don't know about fraud but I did see those guys in Dawg's picture at my polling place delivering " Emergency Democratic Ballots " - heck they let me vote 29 times - just kept getting back in line :)
And on the way out I grabbed about 30 Trump ballots and tossed them in the dumpster - I bet Eric Trump will find them!
 
Not exactly, but very close.

I see no value in dismissing something as incorrect or a lie based upon where it was stated, be it in Gate Way Pundit or the Wall Street Journal.

I understand that people typically approve of one source or another based upon how much the agree with the majority of the content each source puts out to be seen.

I also understand that there are sources interested in promoting one position or another on any given manner with no desire to promote any opposing views. Therefore I personally would never expect promoting a left leaning position on a right leaning source or promoting a right leaning position on a left leaning source.

But I read them and do not just refuse to see something based upon where it is presented.

But again, I understand that is just ME.
If your only evidence is an unsupported allegation in a source known for its dishonest propaganda, that says something.
 
If your only evidence is an unsupported allegation in a source known for its dishonest propaganda, that says something.

Ok.

Which is why I said that, jut me personally, like to use the content within the source to disprove or discredit the poster's beliefs. Read the linked to article, no matter the source, find how the issue being discussed is merely an allegation or that it is unsupported, then present that to argue your position.

I personally just find it intelligently dishonest to merely dismiss a point because I do not approve of where it is written. Obviously you do not share this view.

Again, ok.
 
Ok.

Which is why I said that, jut me personally, like to use the content within the source to disprove or discredit the poster's beliefs. Read the linked to article, no matter the source, find how the issue being discussed is merely an allegation or that it is unsupported, then present that to argue your position.

I personally just find it intelligently dishonest to merely dismiss a point because I do not approve of where it is written. Obviously you do not share this view.

Again, ok.
OK. The sources are just making bald claims while providing no evidence that they are true.
 
Such as? Use their own words to disprove them.
From the Gateway Pundit article:

Suddenly 200,000 ballots for Biden appeared in a midnight ballot dump.

(referencing an altered graph)
Notice the vertical blue line showing the massive ballot dump for Biden.

This is blatant fraud.

The only evidence, besides the graph which is altered (I know because I’ve seen the original), is their say-so.
 
Back
Top