New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Electoral Map

Mitt better keep his mouth closed or Obama will win by 200 electoral votes instead of 130! Ol' Mittens likes to shoot himself in the foot then brag about what a wonderful shot he is!
 
lol... Have to agree.. should put a safety net on Romney's mouth as well ! :D
 
Now Mitt has come out and admitted they manipulated the numbers on his tax return so it would be in the 13%! That guy is nuts.
 
lol... Have to agree.. should put a safety net on Romney's mouth as well ! :D

Mitt is very often having to extricate his foot from his mouth, which can be an especially cumbersome procedure when he has his head up his arse. [Just try to picture it.]
 
lol.. Would be hard to do,,, but the picture of his foot in his mouth is easy to conjure up.. ;)
 
When Mittens land up in prison

I hope it will be a tough prison 'cause Mittens will become evereyones kitten.
 
Even Razzy concurs:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard

In fact, so do these:

http://www.270towin.com/

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/

I started watching the state by state electoral polls about seven months ago.

During that time, there has NEVER been a time during which the President didn't have a substantial lead in Electoral Votes. Never mind what the corporate media says about how this is too close to call. It may be closer than these numbers make it seem, but it's nowhere near as close as the corporate media keeps telling us.
 
Sorry..guys.. having PC problems.. had to log off and sign back on..

Nope,, don't see nary a one.. Tom..
 
Even Razzy concurs:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard

In fact, so do these:

http://www.270towin.com/

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/

I started watching the state by state electoral polls about seven months ago.

During that time, there has NEVER been a time during which the President didn't have a substantial lead in Electoral Votes. Never mind what the corporate media says about how this is too close to call. It may be closer than these numbers make it seem, but it's nowhere near as close as the corporate media keeps telling us.

Strange that you should say that,Tom,because I have been listening off and on today.This morning they showed polls that have Obama ahead by 5 to 8 points in almost all states..I tuned in this afternoon and they showed a poll saying 47/47! Where are they getting these numbers from?
 
You have to remember that promoting the horse race is good for ratings. As long as the audience thinks it's a potential cliffhanger, they stay glued to the TV screens.

The media portrayed the 1980 election as too close to call right up till the moment Reagan crushed Carter.

They did the same thing in 2004, feeding false hopes to those of us who hoped the public would wake up and get rid of GW Bush. I had started watching electoral polls early on during that election too, and the pattern was much the same as with this one. Media portrayed the election as very, very close, always tossing out nationwide polls and nationwide indices on things like likability or preference on specific issues. No discussion of the electoral college at all. The reason was simple. Bush held the lead in electoral votes from the very beginning, and never gave it up. This year, Obama's lead is far greater then Bush's 2004 lead was, though.

In 2008, the media again portrayed the election as far closer than it actually turned out to be. The McCain campaign knew it too.

It's what they do. They want the ratings, and they want the advertising money that goes with them. Fox will see its ratings plunge by 25 to 30% after the election, as they did in 2008. The rest of them will see drops as well.
 
That is what it amounts to.. primarily keeping their show's ratings up -- regardless of the true polling of the candidates!

You nailed it.. Tom,, thanks!
 
Back
Top