New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Empty Suits

bdtex said:
Read the article. A torrent of frivolous lawsuits. His lawyers should be sanctioned.
Click to expand...
One such argument in Michigan was rejected without a hearing from what I understand. I'm not a lawyer but I heard one podcaster say that even the most baseless lawsuits that come before an appeals court judge get at least a courtesy hearing before being rejected. This one was from the inbox to the desk to the shredder. https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news...aign-loses-lawsuit-on-vote-in-michigan-648171
 
bdtex said:
Read the article. A torrent of frivolous lawsuits. His lawyers should be sanctioned.
Click to expand...
I did. Yes. I think it is all theater...so he can exit under cover of a conspiracy of his own creation.. then we'll get...."I filed xx hundreds of lawsuits but the swamp....." for years after
 
Queen Titania said:
You should watch at least the first two of these vids


This is Orwellian and most people believe Big Bro ( the media) ---
Click to expand...


Question...

If the proof of fraud is in the hundreds of persons and instances....why is the attorney in my reference above... testifying he has no evidence?
 
Queen Titania said:
How should I know?
Click to expand...
Because you just interjected with two videos that you thought I should watch, declared things orwellian, and that most people are believing the media intimating that something was being missed..or should not be believed..


Or...no..you don't know a thing that may be amiss?
 
PhilFish said:
Question...

If the proof of fraud is in the hundreds of persons and instances....why is the attorney in my reference above... testifying he has no evidence?
Click to expand...
Those kind of videos are popping up everywhere on the right and being passed around like a doobie. Here...take a hit off this...good shiite....
 
PhilFish said:
Because you just interjected with two videos that you thought I should watch, declared things orwellian, and that most people are believing the media intimating that something was being missed..or should not be believed..


Or...no..you don't know a thing that may be amiss?
Click to expand...

If you had been taking note; they told us what they were going to do ( steal the election) and in such away that every move Trump may make, he will get stuck in their tar baby.

They being silicon valley, Gates etc foundations, corporates, owned lock stock and barrel media, Dems = Deep State.
 
bdtex said:
Those kind of videos are popping up everywhere on the right and being passed around like a doobie. Here...take a hit off this...good shiite....
Click to expand...

Polly has been around for years - she was recently deplatformed from youtube butis back for now.

Doesn't it trouble you that the Prez of the USA has no public voice? Cut off by TV networks and the video disappeared - all of his tweets censored - doesn't that bother you? Or are you totally sheepified?
 
Queen Titania said:
If you had been taking note; they told us what they were going to do ( steal the election) and in such away that every move Trump may make, he will get stuck in their tar baby.

They being silicon valley, Gates etc foundations, corporates, owned lock stock and barrel media, Dems = Deep State.
Click to expand...


Ok. Like I said. This is no Small potatoes. The endeavor would have to be so huge that at least in my opinion even a nominal attorney would be able to find some evidence. instead we have random attorneys seemingly less than nominal, appearing in court with zero evidence.
 
Queen Titania said:
Doesn't it trouble you that the Prez of the USA has no public voice? Cut off by TV networks and the video disappeared - all of his tweets censored - doesn't that bother you? Or are you totally sheepified?
Click to expand...
Nope, nope and nope.
 
PhilFish said:
Ok. Like I said. This is no Small potatoes. The endeavor would have to be so huge that at least in my opinion even a nominal attorney would be able to find some evidence. instead we have random attorneys seemingly less than nominal, appearing in court with zero evidence.
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, itself, has broken constitutional law so are you expecting them to find themselves guilty?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top