Enter precedent from the 2000 election

[Days]

Here we go. Politics as usual.

Stein is going to request a recount in Michigan.

Let's be clear, Hillary's campaign is fully on board and is most likely the driving force behind this request. Stein is totally concerned about the integrity of the vote in the 3 states that Trump won by the smallest margins and have the biggest impact on the electoral college. Stein is totally unconcerned with the integrity of the vote in states won by Hillary by even slimmer margins. Anyone buying into the sincerity of these lawyers needs to buy some bridges in NYC from me, I live in Chicago and I'm dead poor, but trust me, I really own those bridges, and I can let them go for a real bargain.

So this is just Hillary trying to steal the election. You've got to know that they are stuffing those boxes with votes setting up for a surprise overturn of election result, by the recount, which they have already pre-explained is going to be a result of Republican vote count hacks. Hillary doubled her actual vote with voter fraud but it wasn't enough, so now they ask for a recount and keep on ballot stuffing. pretty simple.

How to stop this cheating?

Wellllllllll, the Republicans can challenge the request for the recount. That would shut down the process for a couple of days plus whatever time listening to argument. By the time they got back to the recount, there's no way they could finish on time. What happens then?

precedent 2000

The original count is retained and the 16 electors vote for Trump.

Republicans would be total fools to not challenge Stein's requests in Michigan and Pennsylvania. It would effectively seal the deal. Wisconsin is not enough electors to change the election result.

real world presidential election in 2016 = nothing close to 'fairness' - it's all about state laws, tactics, attorneys, and a whole lot of cheating from every direction.

 

[Jen]

We wonder why Leftists keep ordering any GOP candidate to state that he will accept the outcome of the vote. No need to wonder. It's because Democrats NEVER accept the vote outcome.

They project what they do onto others (that never do it) and pretend those others have already done it and chastise others for doing exactly what they, the Left, always does.

It's been done here on this board to Righties by the Left on every single argument. They know what they would do if the scenario was turned around and they accuse the Right of doing that and make the whole argument about something the Right never did and would never do.

Lefties are nuts. Totally NUT JOBS.

 

[Days]

We wonder why Leftists keep ordering any GOP candidate to state that he will accept the outcome of the vote. No need to wonder. It's because Democrats NEVER accept the vote outcome.

They project what they do onto others (that never do it) and pretend those others have already done it and chastise others for doing exactly what they, the Left, always does.

It's been done here on this board to Righties by the Left on every single argument. They know what they would do if the scenario was turned around and they accuse the Right of doing that and make the whole argument about something the Right never did and would never do.

Lefties are nuts. Totally NUT JOBS.

I disagree... not with your political content, you speak by experience there, but I disagree with what you characterized as strategy for the Hillary campaign. I think the real reason Hillary tried to bully Trump into not challenging the election is because she wanted free reign to cheat, IOW, she knew Trump would challenge her, so she lays down precedent to point the finger at Republican hacking to explain for Dem ballot stuffing.

Dems did a ton of ballot stuffing this election, and they knew they had to do so, I posted for six months on how poor Hillary's support was in this election, I'd wager over half of the votes for Hillary in this election were fraudulent. Hillary knew she had to cheat like hell to steal this election, so she laid down precedent to explain away her cheating and blame it on the Republicans.

 

[Jen]

I disagree... not with your political content, you speak by experience there, but I disagree with what you characterized as strategy for the Hillary campaign. I think the real reason Hillary tried to bully Trump into not challenging the election is because she wanted free reign to cheat, IOW, she knew Trump would challenge her, so she lays down precedent to point the finger at Republican hacking to explain for Dem ballot stuffing.

Dems did a ton of ballot stuffing this election, and they knew they had to do so, I posted for six months on how poor Hillary's support was in this election, I'd wager over half of the votes for Hillary in this election were fraudulent. Hillary knew she had to cheat like hell to steal this election, so she laid down precedent to explain away her cheating and blame it on the Republicans.

There were more reasons than one for Hillary to bully Trump about accepting the election outcome. Yours is viable as is mine.

 

[Days]

There were more reasons than one for Hillary to bully Trump about accepting the election outcome. Yours is viable as is mine.

Not saying your reasons are not in play. But the main reason... the over whelming pressure of the moment... was how to get away with the biggest election theft in the history of America, if not the world.

 

[RickWA]

Here we go. Politics as usual.

Stein is going to request a recount in Michigan.

Let's be clear, Hillary's campaign is fully on board and is most likely the driving force behind this request. Stein is totally concerned about the integrity of the vote in the 3 states that Trump won by the smallest margins and have the biggest impact on the electoral college. Stein is totally unconcerned with the integrity of the vote in states won by Hillary by even slimmer margins. Anyone buying into the sincerity of these lawyers needs to buy some bridges in NYC from me, I live in Chicago and I'm dead poor, but trust me, I really own those bridges, and I can let them go for a real bargain.

So this is just Hillary trying to steal the election. You've got to know that they are stuffing those boxes with votes setting up for a surprise overturn of election result, by the recount, which they have already pre-explained is going to be a result of Republican vote count hacks. Hillary doubled her actual vote with voter fraud but it wasn't enough, so now they ask for a recount and keep on ballot stuffing. pretty simple.

How to stop this cheating?

Wellllllllll, the Republicans can challenge the request for the recount. That would shut down the process for a couple of days plus whatever time listening to argument. By the time they got back to the recount, there's no way they could finish on time. What happens then?

precedent 2000

The original count is retained and the 16 electors vote for Trump.

Republicans would be total fools to not challenge Stein's requests in Michigan and Pennsylvania. It would effectively seal the deal. Wisconsin is not enough electors to change the election result.

real world presidential election in 2016 = nothing close to 'fairness' - it's all about state laws, tactics, attorneys, and a whole lot of cheating from every direction.

Let us distill this:

Hillary Clinton - NO integrity.
Jill Stein (supposed third party) - NO integrity
Bernie Sanders - sold out, rolled over, directly supported the same old establishment - NO integrity
Donald Trump - NO integrity

The political "viability filter" assures that only maggots pass through the electoral membrane. The unrepentant, in-your-face conduct of these maggots instill in me two things.

1) Disgust
2) Protective paternal instinct to fortify my family/friends/community.

Congrats, "system". I don't do "enemies", but I DO rally to likeminded, local interests.

 

[Caroljo]

For as far back as I can remember, Michigan has always gone Democrat. Michigan has certified the election results, but Dem's are still whining about a recount. We thought 2000 was bad, this is going to make the Bush/Gore election look like childs play. Liberals have gotten much more meaner over the years....

 

[Days]

For as far back as I can remember, Michigan has always gone Democrat. Michigan has certified the election results, but Dem's are still whining about a recount. We thought 2000 was bad, this is going to make the Bush/Gore election look like childs play. Liberals have gotten much more meaner over the years....

one thing hasn't changed... the lawyers. Process is going to play out and this could be the election with the most states within 1%. I expected a half dozen recounts. By the states. But I guess someone has to request the recount... and pay for it! Best Democracy your money can buy...