New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

extrapolation lesson please..vis a vis Haircut Mutt...

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
do I have the formula correct...

Mutt + Haircut + Lauber (shy teen who was teased for "presumed homosexuality.") = lifelong homophobe / hater.

Obama + "maybe a little blow" + "When I was a kid, I inhaled." = lifelong drug user.


check my math.. get back to me...


thanks
 
Maybe you missed it. Obama is ok with gay marriage. Mitt isn't. This could be why. See the connection?
 
you have it absolutely incorrect

Mutt + disgust that someone would dare to look and act different than him= Intolerant bigot not fit to represent 330 million people
 
The "lifelong" part belongs in neither equation.

Obama is clearly not a lifelong drug abuser, and Willard may or may not stil be a homophobe. So "lifelong" is a questionable variable in the Willard equation. Add the word "possible" and the equation would be accurate.
 
do I have the formula correct...

Mutt + Haircut + Lauber (shy teen who was teased for "presumed homosexuality.") = lifelong homophobe / hater.

Obama + "maybe a little blow" + "When I was a kid, I inhaled." = lifelong drug user.

Sure... bad math. You assume transitive closure where there is none.

IE you leave out some stuff

Mitt+Haircut+Lauber ==> A belief in the evils of homosexuality.
Mitt+Belief - No Repudiation of earlier belief ==> CONTINUED BELIEF in the "evils" of homosexuality.

OTOH with Obama

Obama+"A little blow"+"inhaled as a kid" ==> Experimented with illicit drugs as most youth do.
Obama+Experimented+Repudiation of usage ==> No evidence of lifelong usage.



See the part you miss is that there is NO REPUDIATION OF HIS EARLIER BELIEFS by Romney.
 
You mean how does Mittwit hating gays when he was eighteen translate into him hating gays today?

Gee. That's a hard one to extrapolate. Real head scratcher.

I hear FOX has a psychiatrist on staff who can psychoanalyze someone from news clips. Let's see if he can help us. He connected Obama's tot-hood to his hatred of the Supreme Court. This one should be a piece of cake for him.
 
hey...if we're all gonna play at words... agreed...possibly...is a better variable. but, now clearly and may or may not.. how do we know, clearly?
 
hey...if we're all gonna play at words... agreed...possibly...is a better variable. but, now clearly and may or may not.. how do we know, clearly?
Hey, bud, would you rememeber if you had abused somebody in the high school ?

I am willing to accept the Willard the lying swine did not know about the victim's sexual orientation and just did not like his hair.
Is that normal for a kid who is not from privileged "I am better then you" background assault the other kid the it was done?
Why the other kids from that episode remember this and are very uncomfortable about it?
Do you think Willard has changed? Do you think his happiness at firing people destroying their lives changed?
Do you think he is not considering himself still a better human than you?
Do you really think that lying etch=a=sketch swine should be American President?
Seriously, phil
 
ok.. i'm willing to work with ya...

his religious beliefs? his publically stated beliefs? one goes searching for quotes and positions and they suggest....differently.. at least no expression of evil.. (which may or may not be his personal beliefs....) http://aboutmittromney.com/gay_issues.htm#statements
well a "phobia" is an irrational fear.

Cuomo "phobia" then is ANY irrational fear based on homosexuality. Now as a child that expressed itself as beating up a kid. As an adult it expresses itself as

'' "At the same time, I believe that marriage should be reserved for a relationship between one man and one woman. For me, that's not a matter of discrimination," Romney adds
Since he offers no REASONED or LOGICAL bases for this "belief"... it isn't rational. And clearly there is a fear there since he talks about being "very committed to traditional marriage".

So that means he still harbors FEAR about homosexuality. A fear based in irrationality. QED Homophobia. Now he's gotten better since age 12 (or whatever age that was) in throwing up a smoke screen of verbiage about "treating all people with respect and dignity" but he fails to address the logical fallacy of being "FOR the absence of discrimination" and then advocating writing discrimination into the US Constitution via a Gay Marriage Ban Amendment.

So clearly there is still irrationality there.

OTOH with Obama - well actually he - like the vast majority of adults, actually is a drug user. After all, Alcohol (and nicotine) are both drugs. Alcohol being the more physiologically harmful and Nicotine being amont the most addictive in the world. So to that extent your end claim is accurate - but how you got there is not. the research on "illicit drug use by youth" shows a strong correlation between social adaptivity and leaership skills, and a willingness to EXPERIMENT with illicit drugs but then leave them for more interesting pursuits. It turns out that the social adaptivity profiles of both the abstainers and addicts are almost the same.

So Obama turns out to have experimented with illicit drugs. As did Clinton, as did Dole (drinking as a minor is illicit drug use), as did GWB. One of the big differences here is that GWB's drug use

  1. Adversely affected his daily life and relationships - not so with Obama
  2. required his quitting Cold Turkey (as a drug addict does) - not so with Obama (wine drinking)
  3. Continued heavily into his adult years - not so with Obama
GWB was an addict on the wagon - and was not willing to be open about that. THAT is dangerous.

Romney is not willing to be open about his homophobia either.
 
did you youth pass without some stupidity? were you never in a fight? pick on another? or get picked on? tease? etc..

I am willing to accept that Willard didnot know the victims orientation. I am willing to accept and profer admonition.

That it extends fifty years forward? no. absent definitives..no.

further... have you ever fired anyone... did you enjoy it? ive fired dozens.. hated every one. you do business..?
 
nice to see youre still avoiding the main issue! hatred of someone that dared to look and act differently than he did. and if you have had to FIRE dozens of people, that doesnt say much for your hiring and managing skills. but thats no surprise!! hahaahahhahahahaahahahahaah
 
Back
Top