New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Fact Checking Snopes

reason10

Governor
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger


Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”


Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.


While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.


RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack of American Flags At DNC


She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”


She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)


Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)


It's settled. This is NOT a valid source. I just proved it.
 
There's no question Snopes is a liberal hack site that distorts the truth for their agenda. They are perhaps the worst of the leftist "fact checkers"- a complete fraud.
 
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger


Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”


Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.


While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.


RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack of American Flags At DNC


She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”


She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)


Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

It's settled. This is NOT a valid source. I just proved it.
CDqKttgW0AAkuhP.jpg
CfOZPczW8AAmg6_.jpg
KimLaCapria.jpg


Kim Lacapria. Authority on... what, exactly? I should believe what she has to say.... WHY????
 
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger


Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”


Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.


While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.


RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack of American Flags At DNC


She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”


She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)


Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

It's settled. This is NOT a valid source. I just proved it.
Snopes is a joke and has been for quite a while...probably always was.
 
Figures fact checkers would be suspect to cons. Facts are anathema to cons.

So far you libs have never posted any facts.

Oh, and to bring you up to speed with the rest of the class (who is NOT sitting in the regular seats snickering at you in the corner with the dunce cap on) FACTS ARE NOT THE SAME AS LIBERAL OPINIONS.
 
Figures fact checkers would be suspect to cons. Facts are anathema to cons.

So what are we supposed to do when we catch "fact checkers" distorting and lying? Keep believing them?

I have a wonderful business opportunity I'd like to talk to you about. Trust me, you're gonna love it!
 
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger


Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is A Failed Liberal Blogger

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”


Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.


While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.


RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack of American Flags At DNC


She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”


She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)


Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

It's settled. This is NOT a valid source. I just proved it.
What an oddly misleading headline. You indicated you'd fact-check snopes, but then didn't. What you'd want to do to fact check something isn't to try to smear some individual, but rather to show that something was reported falsely by the source.
 
Figures fact checkers would be suspect to cons. Facts are anathema to cons.

Anyone can call themselves a "fact checker". Do you think she has a degree in "fact checking"? Is she a member of the "American Association of Fact Checkers"? Did she pass the Fact Checking bar exam? LOL

It appears at Snopes.com, the job of "fact checker" is actually "confirming the site owners' bias".
 
What an oddly misleading headline. You indicated you'd fact-check snopes, but then didn't. What you'd want to do to fact check something isn't to try to smear some individual, but rather to show that something was reported falsely by the source.

The title is a pun playing on the subject's job.

It's both funny and sad that needed to be explained to you.
 
I just laugh when someone uses Snopes as PROOF of their BS. Any of us could start our own fact check business. Liberals will believe anything as long as it 'proves' their agenda. True or not......
 
What an oddly misleading headline. You indicated you'd fact-check snopes, but then didn't. What you'd want to do to fact check something isn't to try to smear some individual, but rather to show that something was reported falsely by the source.

I didn't indicate anything. I put out the title of the article, which correctly DEBUNKS snopes as an alleged fact check site. It is nothing more than a liberal OPINION RAG and my link proved it.

You're REALLY pathetic when you lose an argument.
 
I just laugh when someone uses Snopes as PROOF of their BS. Any of us could start our own fact check business. Liberals will believe anything as long as it 'proves' their agenda. True or not......

Thing is, liberals are just plain effing LAZY. Rather than do the legwork themselves to try to prove or disprove a point (which is impossible for a liberal because he/she/it is WRONG on every count) these MORONS go to snopes, thinking it'll do their work for them.
 
I didn't indicate anything. I put out the title of the article, which correctly DEBUNKS snopes as an alleged fact check site. It is nothing more than a liberal OPINION RAG and my link proved it.

You're REALLY pathetic when you lose an argument.
You indicated you'd be fact checking snopes. Then you didn't. Choose your titles more honestly in the future.
 
Back
Top