New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Facts

P

PACE

Guest
Fact 1: a 17 year old was shot dead by a 47 year old man in the parking lot of a convenience store

Fact 2: the shooter claimed he feared for his life

Fact 3: the shooter claimed the 17 year old had a gun

Fact 4: the shooter left the scene post the shooting

Fact 5: the shooter claimed that the driver of the vehicle left and ditched the gun

Fact 6: the eye witnesses state that the driver did not leave the parking lot

Fact 7: the shooter's companion stated there was a predetermination of position prior to the shooting.

Fact 8: it's not about the word "Thug" folks, it's about the shooting death of a 17 year old and whether it was done in the context of "Stand your ground"

Fact 9: In my world? "Stand your ground" a stupid law, and it's time to mend it.

Regards
Pace
 
Fact 1: a 17 year old was shot dead by a 47 year old man in the parking lot of a convenience store

Fact 2: the shooter claimed he feared for his life

Fact 3: the shooter claimed the 17 year old had a gun

Fact 4: the shooter left the scene post the shooting

Fact 5: the shooter claimed that the driver of the vehicle left and ditched the gun

Fact 6: the eye witnesses state that the driver did not leave the parking lot

Fact 7: the shooter's companion stated there was a predetermination of position prior to the shooting.

Fact 8: it's not about the word "Thug" folks, it's about the shooting death of a 17 year old and whether it was done in the context of "Stand your ground"

Fact 9: In my world? "Stand your ground" a stupid law, and it's time to mend it.

Regards
Pace
If the "facts" were as you stated them, SYG will never apply. Thus, there will be a guilty verdict and you need not worry about any political crusade.
 
Fact 1: a 17 year old was shot dead by a 47 year old man in the parking lot of a convenience store

Fact 2: the shooter claimed he feared for his life

Fact 3: the shooter claimed the 17 year old had a gun

Fact 4: the shooter left the scene post the shooting

Fact 5: the shooter claimed that the driver of the vehicle left and ditched the gun

Fact 6: the eye witnesses state that the driver did not leave the parking lot

Fact 7: the shooter's companion stated there was a predetermination of position prior to the shooting.

Fact 8: it's not about the word "Thug" folks, it's about the shooting death of a 17 year old and whether it was done in the context of "Stand your ground"

Fact 9: In my world? "Stand your ground" a stupid law, and it's time to mend it.

Regards
Pace


All very interesting facts. Pretty damning evidence if all are accurate as described too.

But the list is unnecessarily long truth be told. All that need be said was;

Fact 1: A black was killed

Fact 2: A white was involved

Fact 3: A gun was used.


Same ending, see?

Because as we both KNOW, a 17 year old black being killed and his death involving a gun is, sadly, not exactly the type of news that stays in the national media from the night it happens until months later when the case is resolved, is it now?

What makes SOME of these instances so different you reckon?
 
Back
Top