New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Gingrich voter fraud case in Virginia.

TomFitz

TomFitz

Mayor
Gingrich isn't even on the ballot in Virginia, mainly because of his sloppy campaign organization. Plagues by infighting and woefully underfunded, Gingrich has stayed in the race mainly by using TV to stage publicity grabbing stunts, like the South Carolina race baiting, and blaming the media for telling the truth.

But apparantly his organization may have pulled a real boner on a state he's not even on the ballot in:

http://hamptonroads.com/2012/01/va-investigating-gingrich-claims-petition-fraud
 
Gallup state numbers predict huge Obama loss

Screen%20shot%202012-02-01%20at%209.41.29%20AM.png
 
It's got idiocy written all over it.

1. Being so unorganized that he doesn't get on the ballot in the state he's LIVING IN.

2. Thsoe "unusual" elements in the petitions.

3. The fact that he MUST have Southern states to have even a hope in hell...and the TWO that he's not on the ballot?...are Southern States. Virginia and Missouri
 
worldlymrb said:
Then Ban me..
Click to expand...

Sorry, gotta work harder than that to achieve that "martyrdom" you want. I merely point out that NOBODY CARED when it was on your own Top Post....so it looks a little "desperate" to inject it in a thread that has nothing to do with Gallup or the Fall Election.
 
I saw this earlier from another source.

The chart is deliberately misleading, and you added your own efforts to mislead by detaching it from the body of the article it was taken from (the Washington Examiner).

The Examiner piece is based in Gallup polling numbers from LAST FALL.

That's what the article says.

I guess you guys are so used to being lied to in such obvious ways that you've now adopted the tactics for yourselves!

I hope it makes you feel better. We both know it bears little resemblance to current reality.
 
Yep, I wanted tom to see that he has much more important things to worry about than voting irregularities in a vote that has happened yet and where the candidate is not even on the ballot.

BTW, did you know Obama is going to lose the dem primaries in GA to any write in because a court is going to rule he is ineligible to be on the ballot, or is that still hijacking the thread?
 
It really is ridiculous.

And it's all the more so since the Attorney General leading the investigation is Bob Cuccinelli!!!!!!!!! He's about as rabid as they come! He even publically called for the legislature to change the eligibility requirements so Newt could be on the ballot.

I see that the GOP is advancing the ALEC voter disenfranchisement program too. There is an editorial in the Times Dispatch on that.

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/rtd-opinion/2012/feb/02/tdopin01-the-fraud-fraud-ar-1657020/
 
TomFitz said:
It really is ridiculous.

And it's all the more so since the Attorney General leading the investigation is Bob Cuccinelli!!!!!!!!! He's about as rabid as they come! He even publically called for the legislature to change the eligibility requirements so Newt could be on the ballot.

I see that the GOP is advancing the ALEC voter disenfranchisement program too. There is an editorial in the Times Dispatch on that.

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/rtd-opinion/2012/feb/02/tdopin01-the-fraud-fraud-ar-1657020/
Click to expand...

Yeah, with ol' Bob on the case, Newt won't be able to blame "liberals" or the "Media" for it.

It was his own stupidity.

BTW, I like this subject, Tom, let's stick with it. :)
 
TomFitz said:
I saw this earlier from another source.

The chart is deliberately misleading, and you added your own efforts to mislead by detaching it from the body of the article it was taken from (the Washington Examiner).

The Examiner piece is based in Gallup polling numbers from LAST FALL.

That's what the article says.

I guess you guys are so used to being lied to in such obvious ways that you've now adopted the tactics for yourselves!

I hope it makes you feel better. We both know it bears little resemblance to current reality.
Click to expand...

Gordon is right, I should have responded to your top post before poking fun with an electoral map showing Obama's electoral crushing.

But Newt is a pathetic loser who is going nowhere and the GOP is going to nominate a white Obama to teach the Tea Party a Lesson on who the boss is.

In regards to the map. Gallup released their annual state-by-state presidential approval numbers

That is where the numbers come. And since it against a generic GOP candidate, it most likely is irrelevant, in which case Gordon is correct again.
 
IT is hijacking the thread. But, my attempts to check the facts on this yielded pages of rants from the most disgusting parts of the right wing sewer. Rabid partisan hacks like American Thinker and WingNutDaily, and a host of white supremacists.
 
There you go again. Deliberately failing to mention that the annual state-by-state presidential approval number are from LAST YEAR!
 
TomFitz said:
IT is hijacking the thread. But, my attempts to check the facts on this yielded pages of rants from the most disgusting parts of the right wing sewer. Rabid partisan hacks like American Thinker and WingNutDaily, and a host of white supremacists.
Click to expand...

If I hadn't responded to your thread you would have only got one lame response from Gordon.

And I DID interject my thoughts on your top post through the course of this thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top