they can't sustain it. they can't run on it. it's not a winner for them. on the Sunday talkies, repubs were incoherent and obviously flummoxed on the topic.
how do they and Romney explain why RomneyCare was so terrific for Massachusetts that he recommended that Pres Obama apply it nationally?
how do repubs "repeal and replace" when all they want is to keep the good parts of ObamaCare, but eliminate the individual mandate? they know that makes no sense.
how do repubs reconcile the nasty talk from repub govs who are saying they will NOT implement health insurance exchanges in their states? that's so stupid because if they don't, the feds will do it for them.
how do repubs reconcile their insistence that they will NOT accept 100% Medicaid ACA coverage (for 3 years, then 90% thereafter) for their poor?
how do they and Romney explain why RomneyCare was so terrific for Massachusetts that he recommended that Pres Obama apply it nationally?
how do repubs "repeal and replace" when all they want is to keep the good parts of ObamaCare, but eliminate the individual mandate? they know that makes no sense.
how do repubs reconcile the nasty talk from repub govs who are saying they will NOT implement health insurance exchanges in their states? that's so stupid because if they don't, the feds will do it for them.
how do repubs reconcile their insistence that they will NOT accept 100% Medicaid ACA coverage (for 3 years, then 90% thereafter) for their poor?
