New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Grumpy McRage chirps away from the sidelines about Egypt...

Bugsy McGurk

President
Bashing Obama and Kerry for not doing more to handicap the government and boost the rebels.

Of course, the regime is trying to fight off the Islamists, so Grumpy is basically arguing that Obama should do more to help the Islamists.

Good thing this crazy old coot ain't president, eh?

;-)


Sen. John McCain slammed the Obama Administration on Thursday, saying the president did not go far enough in responding to the outbreak of violence in Egypt.

“No, of course not,” the Arizona Republican told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer when asked if the president responded adequately this afternoon by cancelling joint military exercises with Egypt. “We violated our own rule of law by not calling it for what it is because our law clearly states that if it’s a military coup, then aid is cut off. So initially we undercut our own values…That’s a blow to credibility.”

The veteran politician said that Secretary of State also did not help the problem when he gave a statement at the beginning of the month saying that the generals of the Egyptian military “restoring democracy,” when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and McCain were in Egypt at the president’s request.

He argued that Kerry’s statement gave a “degree of legitimacy to a non-elected government that was appointed by generals,” and that the statement might have been interpreted as “a green light to take whatever action necessary to put down any opposition.”
 
well, it's all because as our resident rightwingnuts allege, BHO has full ownership of the Arab Spring that had nothing to do with objections to the govs they sought to change.

He could have given another speech that would have changed everything for the better.
 
Maverick like all the Right ...contradict themselves on Egypt.

On one hand they "deplore" the fact that the military ovrthrew Morsi.....on the other hand, they all claimed Morsi was in league with the Muslim Brotherhood and was turning Egypt into a theocracy and deplored the fact that he was in power.

And naturally the dittoheads believe BOTH. Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
 
Maverick like all the Right ...contradict themselves on Egypt.

On one hand they "deplore" the fact that the military ovrthrew Morsi.....on the other hand, they all claimed Morsi was in league with the Muslim Brotherhood and was turning Egypt into a theocracy and deplored the fact that he was in power.

And naturally the dittoheads believe BOTH. Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.

And by all accounts the demonstrators are led by Islamists.

So, the Pugs bashed Obama when Mubarak was in power, and then bashed him for "allowing" Mubarak to be driven out, and then bashed him whem Morsi was "allowed" to take over, and now bash him because Morsi was deposed, because Islamists have been routed by the army.

A fine example of mindless Pugs having no real positions, other than "whatever happens is Obama's fault, and if it happens it's bad."

;-)
 
Unless President Obama authorizes a full scale invasion of Egypt, McCain will continue to whine about the President's actions.

Question is, why does anyone pay attention to the old codger anyway?
 
And by all accounts the demonstrators are led by Islamists.

So, the Pugs bashed Obama when Mubarak was in power, and then bashed him for "allowing" Mubarak to be driven out, and then bashed him whem Morsi was "allowed" to take over, and now bash him because Morsi was deposed, because Islamists have been routed by the army.

A fine example of mindless Pugs having no real positions, other than "whatever happens is Obama's fault, and if it happens it's bad."

;-)
And in the meantime, by attacking the Egyptian army and siding with the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama may lose us Egypt as an ally.

I've never seen a republican president do that.
 
And in the meantime, by attacking the Egyptian army and siding with the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama may lose us Egypt as an ally.

I've never seen a republican president do that.
Naaahhhh....they just attack the wrong country and declare victory on day three of an endless war.

Obama didn't install Mubarek. Obama didn't remove Mubarek. Obama didn't install Morsi. Obama didn't remove Morsi.

You don't have a clue what's going on in Egypt. You just follow the yellow prick road of Obama/America haters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless President Obama authorizes a full scale invasion of Egypt, McCain will continue to whine about the President's actions.

Question is, why does anyone pay attention to the old codger anyway?

A tough call for Grumpy there - he does love all out wars, but he also loves bashing Obama no matter what he does. He would probably support the decision to start a war, but would immediately bash Obama for the way he did it.
 
And in the meantime, by attacking the Egyptian army and siding with the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama may lose us Egypt as an ally.

I've never seen a republican president do that.


His comments were quite tepid, of course, but the choice is between the Muslim Brotherhood and far crazier Islamists.

He is trying to keep Egypt as an ally (which he why he didn't cut aid) but Grumpy wants him to declare a coup and cut the aid. You think Grumpy is wrong there?
 
A tough call for Grumpy there - he does love all out wars, but he also loves bashing Obama no matter what he does. He would probably support the decision to start a war, but would immediately bash Obama for the way he did it.
This Egypt thing has them spinning all over the place. The playing field is strewn with disconnected dots. Kinda fun to watch.
 
This Egypt thing has them spinning all over the place. The playing field is strewn with disconnected dots. Kinda fun to watch.

Most of the Pugs don't state any positions until Obama announces something, at which time they bash him for it, whatever it is, or isn't.

The GOP: A boil on the national ass.

;-)
 
Most of the Pugs don't state any positions until Obama announces something, at which time they bash him for it, whatever it is, or isn't.

The GOP: A boil on the national ass.

;-)
Bingo. They don't even need Rush any more. They're so indoctrinated that they can now be "lone wolf, home grown" wingnuts. What escapes them is that we know what they're going to say on every issue, too. They could really throw us for a loop if they ever said, "I think Obama got this one right." I guess running away when that turns out to be the case is easier for hypocrites.
 
And in the meantime, by attacking the Egyptian army and siding with the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama may lose us Egypt as an ally.

I've never seen a republican president do that.


And if he helps the military, you'll accuse the President of "breaking the law saying we aren't supposed to aid a country that has had a military coup".....right?
 
Most of the Pugs don't state any positions until Obama announces something, at which time they bash him for it, whatever it is, or isn't.

The GOP: A boil on the national ass.

;-)


Exactly... President Obama could come out opposing drowning kittens and the Repubs would attack him for "wanting to see this country overrun with feral cats!!!!!!"
 
well, it's all because as our resident rightwingnuts allege, BHO has full ownership of the Arab Spring that had nothing to do with objections to the govs they sought to change.

He could have given another speech that would have changed everything for the better.

Why, oh why is the President withholding his Messiah powers? ;)
 
And if he helps the military, you'll accuse the President of "breaking the law saying we aren't supposed to aid a country that has had a military coup".....right?
Nope, I know the background of this little problem, and Obama should not have simply dropped a few bombs and walked away. We had an obligation by our interference in Mubarak's reign to see to it that there was a democratic alternative to the Muslim Brotherhood and Pro-Mubarak politicians.

We did a "drive by" and let the Muslim Brotherhood pick up the pieces.
 
Back
Top