New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Gun Control Hypocrite

Most Liberal Elites are hypocrites on gun control.

11373711_465994390233680_1260629319_n.jpg

turninguns.jpg

2397ba328d6c74d7c8c99ae4ce7180db.jpg

84dc86ff5da3931efcd834321ec81ba9.jpg
 
Don't expect the usual anti-gun mob show up here. They don't like any scenario where the odds are fair.
 
Any anti-gunnners care to comment? @Bugsy McGurk @Spamature @Arkady @JuliefromOhio @write on @middleview
Who did I forget?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/8/armed-guards-protect-senate-democrats-they-demand-/
Senate Democrats gathered Thursday on the steps of the Capitol surrounded by about a dozen armed guards to announce a new push for tougher gun-control laws.

The officers from the U.S. Capitol Police, who carried sidearms, were in addition to the regular detail paroling the Capitol ground due the large number of elected officials attending the event, according to a officer on the scene.

About 27 Democratic senators attended the event.

They announced a set of priorities for combating gun violence, which centered on measures to expand and strengthen background checks for gun purchasers.

They echoed calls by President Obama following the mass shooting last week at a community college in Oregon in which he urged Americans to put pressure on lawmakers to take action to stop the scourge of gun violence in the country.

“We are asking, as the president said, to make their voices heard,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, “We expect there will be a groundswell.”

The Democrats’ priorities for gun control, which also closely mirrored the plan rolled out last week by Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, included:

*Closing background check “loopholes,” such as stopping criminals from buying firearms at gun shows or online;

*Improving background checks to include barring domestic abusers and stalkers from buying guns;

*And shutting down the “illegal gun pipeline” by making straw purchasing of guns and gun trafficking a federal crime.

“The victims and their families deserve better than a Congress that shrugs its shoulders and waited for the next tragedy,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, Oregon Democrat. “They deserve action.”
 
Any anti-gunnners care to comment? @Bugsy McGurk @Spamature @Arkady @JuliefromOhio @write on @middleview
Who did I forget?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/8/armed-guards-protect-senate-democrats-they-demand-/
Senate Democrats gathered Thursday on the steps of the Capitol surrounded by about a dozen armed guards to announce a new push for tougher gun-control laws.

The officers from the U.S. Capitol Police, who carried sidearms, were in addition to the regular detail paroling the Capitol ground due the large number of elected officials attending the event, according to a officer on the scene.

About 27 Democratic senators attended the event.

They announced a set of priorities for combating gun violence, which centered on measures to expand and strengthen background checks for gun purchasers.

They echoed calls by President Obama following the mass shooting last week at a community college in Oregon in which he urged Americans to put pressure on lawmakers to take action to stop the scourge of gun violence in the country.

“We are asking, as the president said, to make their voices heard,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, “We expect there will be a groundswell.”

The Democrats’ priorities for gun control, which also closely mirrored the plan rolled out last week by Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, included:

*Closing background check “loopholes,” such as stopping criminals from buying firearms at gun shows or online;

*Improving background checks to include barring domestic abusers and stalkers from buying guns;

*And shutting down the “illegal gun pipeline” by making straw purchasing of guns and gun trafficking a federal crime.

“The victims and their families deserve better than a Congress that shrugs its shoulders and waited for the next tragedy,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, Oregon Democrat. “They deserve action.”

I am not anti gun. And what is wrong with stronger background checks ?
 
I am not anti gun. And what is wrong with stronger background checks ?

would stronger background checks stopped the guy that just shot two cops at a gun free Panera? Cops had looked for him for 2 years for shooting his wife, you think criminals do background checks?
 
would stronger background checks stopped the guy that just shot two cops at a gun free Panera? Cops had looked for him for 2 years for shooting his wife, you think criminals do background checks?

Who knows ? Maybe it would have. You can't say that since they don't stop killing that happen does not mean they would stop killing. I could just as easily say that anyone gun owner how is killed by someone means that having a gun doesn't prevent people from being killed. Or that suicides prove that having a gun makes it more likely that you will be killed.

I instead prefer to say that we should do more to prevent people from being killed by guns.
 
I am not anti gun. And what is wrong with stronger background checks ?
I've never seen an anti-gun say anything except "I'm just for common sense gun laws". Of course, when you nail them down to what that means, it means they are anti-gun.
 
I've never seen an anti-gun say anything except "I'm just for common sense gun laws". Of course, when you nail them down to what that means, it means they are anti-gun.

I could say that you are pro murder and pro mass murder since I have never seen anyone over enthusiastic about guns call for and or describe common sense laws after people are murdered with guns.
 
I could say that you are pro murder and pro mass murder since I have never seen anyone over enthusiastic about guns call for and or describe common sense laws after people are murdered with guns.
Of course you could. That's what anti-gunners do; spin the truth to fit their paradigm.
 
Who knows ? Maybe it would have. You can't say that since they don't stop killing that happen does not mean they would stop killing. I could just as easily say that anyone gun owner how is killed by someone means that having a gun doesn't prevent people from being killed. Or that suicides prove that having a gun makes it more likely that you will be killed.

I instead prefer to say that we should do more to prevent people from being killed by guns.

reread that word salad.................sounds like Θ without a teleprompter ☻
geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezus
 
....I instead prefer to say that we should do more to prevent people from being killed by guns.
The difference between an anti-gunner and a humanitarian? A humanitarian sincerely cares about human welfare and seeks to promote safety and prevention of human harm regardless of the cause be it automobiles, swimming pools, unhealthy eating/lifestyles and other common causes of death.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
Number of deaths for leading causes of death
  • Heart disease: 611,105
  • Cancer: 584,881
  • Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 149,205
  • Accidents (unintentional injuries): 130,557
  • Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,978
  • Alzheimer's disease: 84,767
  • Diabetes: 75,578
  • Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,979
  • Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 47,112
  • Intentional self-harm (suicide): 41,149
Anti-gunners only concern themselves with gun deaths and believe stronger gun control, if not outright banning, will lead to Utopia. Notice that guns aren't even on the list provided albeit, in the US, they are the most common means of suicide.
 
The difference between an anti-gunner and a humanitarian? A humanitarian sincerely cares about human welfare and seeks to promote safety and prevention of human harm regardless of the cause be it automobiles, swimming pools, unhealthy eating/lifestyles and other common causes of death.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
Number of deaths for leading causes of death
  • Heart disease: 611,105
  • Cancer: 584,881
  • Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 149,205
  • Accidents (unintentional injuries): 130,557
  • Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,978
  • Alzheimer's disease: 84,767
  • Diabetes: 75,578
  • Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,979
  • Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 47,112
  • Intentional self-harm (suicide): 41,149
Anti-gunners only concern themselves with gun deaths and believe stronger gun control, if not outright banning, will lead to Utopia. Notice that guns aren't even on the list provided albeit, in the US, they are the most common means of suicide.

I am all for doing something to lessen the number of ALL premature deaths by ALL causes. Murder supporters not so much.
 
reread that word salad.................sounds like Θ without a teleprompter ☻
geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezus

There you go genius. Now do you have a response.

Who knows ? Maybe it would have. You can't say that since they don't stop killings that happen does not mean they would not stop killings. I could just as easily say that anyone. gun owner how who is killed by someone means that having a gun doesn't prevent people from being killed. Or that suicides prove that having a gun makes it more likely that you will be killed.

I instead prefer to say that we should do more to prevent people from being killed by guns.
 
There you go genius. Now do you have a response.

Who knows ? Maybe it would have. You can't say that since they don't stop killings that happen does not mean they would not stop killings. I could just as easily say that anyone. gun owner how who is killed by someone means that having a gun doesn't prevent people from being killed. Or that suicides prove that having a gun makes it more likely that you will be killed.

I instead prefer to say that we should do more to prevent people from being killed by guns.

How about automobiles, as of lately machete and Doctors............you do know they kill more people than all other things?

When will libs ban abortions?
 
There you go genius. Now do you have a response.

Who knows ? Maybe it would have. You can't say that since they don't stop killings that happen does not mean they would not stop killings. I could just as easily say that anyone. gun owner how who is killed by someone means that having a gun doesn't prevent people from being killed. Or that suicides prove that having a gun makes it more likely that you will be killed.

I instead prefer to say that we should do more to prevent people from being killed by guns.



i prefer to say enforce the gun laws we already have and target the most prolific gun criminals thus reducing gun crime without infringing legal gun owners...



i sure they know where to look...
 
How about automobiles, as of lately machete and Doctors............you do know they kill more people than all other things?

When will libs ban abortions?

Yet another foolish reply.

Automobiles and machetes were not created with the specific purpose of killing human beings, guns were. When doctors do it , it is by accident. Generally when it is done with a gun it is one purpose.
 
Yet another foolish reply.

Automobiles and machetes were not created with the specific purpose of killing human beings, guns were. When doctors do it , it is by accident. Generally when it is done with a gun it is one purpose.


if you wish to get technical, the "original" intent of guns was a more accurate, easy way to hunt...i dont think it took very long to be used as a weapon against others,,but i doubt very much it was invented to kill humans...
 
Back
Top