wookie-leeks
Mayor
I wish Easy E was still alive to tell the angry pink menace what time it is. I extend the number one salute to the liberals.
Merry Mofoing X Mas.
Merry Mofoing X Mas.
I think newspapers are mostly declining because young people don't read them. Like me, they probably get most of their news from web-based sources now. Being old-fashioned, I pretty much get my news via Associated Press.
Newspapers are declining, IMHO, because they've evolved into a commercial advertiser; customers paying to read paid for advertisements. Where's the beef that readers are looking for?
gramps
Zoar -- thanks for posting these. I think they're amusing and wholly appropriate displays for Christmas by gun enthusiasts. You're not making your ongoing case that gun owners are murderous radicals by posting them, you're just giving us a nice laugh.
Some of us just might find the idea of the gun totin' Christmas (you know...the celebration of the birth of the Prince of Peace) Card folks a bit askew with the general seasonal message of Peace On Earth and Goodwill Towards Men.
For your viewing pleasure..
Yeah, Craig, those with no sense of humor or irony might be that way.
Differing senses of humor. It's stupid to claim others humorless when they fail to share our exact humor, but it doesn't stop folks from making the claim.
For example, I don't find the Three Stooges remotely funny, never have, but many seem to find them uncontrollably hysterical. But I find George Carlin funny. Louis CK...David Sedaris...because they play word games and use cultural references instead of physical comedy.
Yes, some irony is involved as your gun totin' families arm themselves to the teeth in celebration of peace on earth. Peace through strength, screw that swords into ploughshares silliness. Irony.
Some of us just might find the idea of the gun totin' Christmas (you know...the celebration of the birth of the Prince of Peace) Card folks a bit askew with the general seasonal message of Peace On Earth and Goodwill Towards Men.
As Benjamin Franklin pointed out, those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who didn't.
Did he?
I can find proof of that quote.
I found it here: http://livebyquotes.com/2013/those-...-up-plowing-for-those-who-didnt-ben-franklin/ but I can't testify to the reliability of that source.
He certainly did write, for the Philadelphia Assembly's reply to the governor, "They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," which is a similar concept. I'm not willing to give up my essential liberty (firearms) in the name of safety.
Yeah...I went looking for verification and found none.
Similar perhaps, but different enough to notice. We aren't in the plowshares quote concerning ourselves with temporary safety and any loss of liberty, but a wholly sustainable and peaceful community unburdened by the horror of war between nations. Clearly an absurd notion as the phrase is OT...and war between nations has been nearly constant in those 3000 or so years since.
I thought we were talking in both cases about whether it is better to be armed or not armed in a time of crisis. The latter statement, which is much better documented, would certainly indicate a bias in favor of being armed, or at least of the retention of individual rights even if that means an elevated risk.
Frequently, what I hear from the more elevated people on the side of the debate that favors more controls on firearms, is a safety-based argument. I reject that argument as safety can't be assured with or without firearms. Given that fact, I'd prefer to retain my right to own firearms, even if that entails a higher risk.
Believe me...each and every one of us knows your feelings on guns.
In the plowshares consideration, the swords are armaments for war between nations, not self defense from a local predator.