New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Hell, why bother

fxstc

fxstc

Council Member
Why even have political parties.
From what I see historically, the only reason we have more than one party, is so we can blame one party or another.
That keeps the pressure off of any current adm.
What would they do? (The political leaders that is)
If something went wrong, who the hell would they blame?
Certainly wouldnt blame themselves.
That leaves "We the People" doesnt it?
From some of the posts I have read here, you get an idea that there are in fact many who believe that a one party system is, including a 9 same ideology SC, is a "good" thing.
Me? I believe otherwise.
You DO know what happens when the people are blamed for everyuthing, do you not?
 
fxstc said:
Why even have political parties.
From what I see historically, the only reason we have more than one party, is so we can blame one party or another.
That keeps the pressure off of any current adm.
What would they do? (The political leaders that is)
If something went wrong, who the hell would they blame?
Certainly wouldnt blame themselves.
That leaves "We the People" doesnt it?
From some of the posts I have read here, you get an idea that there are in fact many who believe that a one party system is, including a 9 same ideology SC, is a "good" thing.
Me? I believe otherwise.
You DO know what happens when the people are blamed for everyuthing, do you not?
Click to expand...

you already have a one party state
 
The two govt management teams (owned by offshore central banks), are going to tag team the republic into submission and elimination.
 
So thats why the Koch Brothers spent a billion dollars trying to get RMoney elected, because he was going to be just like Obama. Why didnt I think of that. And I remember Bush being just like Clinton and keeping all those budget surpluses. Yep, both parties are jussssst alike.
 
fxstc said:
Who the hell is talking about party differences?
I certainally said nothing about party differences
Click to expand...

Why even have political parties.
From what I see historically, the only reason we have more than one party, is so we can blame one party or another.
Click to expand...

So you mean even though the parties are completely different and have noncompatible ideologies, we shouldnt even have more than one? Sorry, does that make a lot of sense you you?
 
gabriel said:
minor details. when it comes to foreign policy, lobbying by big business, tax reform, drug laws etc, they vary little
Click to expand...

Even the so-called divisive issue of abortion, you could always count on the GOP to make sure it remained the law of the land.
 
OldGaffer said:
So you mean even though the parties are completely different and have noncompatible ideologies, we shouldnt even have more than one? Sorry, does that make a lot of sense you you?
Click to expand...
Didnt say we SHOULDNT have a two party system.
I said, reading some of the posts one might get the idea that there are those that would not mind a ONE party system.
 
fxstc said:
Didnt say we SHOULDNT have a two party system.
I said, reading some of the posts one might get the idea that there are those that would not mind a ONE party system.
Click to expand...

And the gist of the post is,
WHO WOULD THE GOVERNMENT BLAME THEN?
The people, thats who
 
In other words, if we had a one party system, as some would like, the gov wouldnt blame themselves whenever things got screwed up, they would blame us.
 
I like two parties, a progressive Democratic party and a sane, moderately conservative Republican party. One not under the thrall of Grover Norquist, the Koch Brothers, Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh. I was an Eisenhower Republican, hell, even a Nixon Republican but I bailed when the Moral Majority told me I had no place in the new Republican Party because of my "freedom of choice" stance. And trickle down economics has destroyed the middle class in this country over the last 30 years, it has got to go the way of laissez faire capitalism. Bring the republican party back toward the center and it might possibly win another presidential election, if it stays on the fringe you can stick a fork in it.
 
Maybe you guys are missing FX's point?

Perhaps i am as well yet i do see some positives here, and the question is fairly thought provoking.

Developing ..... ;-)
 
Craig said:
Is that because they aren't really people? Regardless, I am unsure as to why these top 1% are insulated from blame. Could you fill us in on that?
Click to expand...

Top 1% of the 1%'ers (.01%'ers), own 55% of that wealth, and they all have very strong "relationships" with the foreign financed U.S Federal govt.

And they of course, are the ones privileged enough to get waivers, or laws re-written, are TBTF and above all laws.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top