New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Hilariously hypocritical Sarah Palin: Where's the free speech for Phil Robertson?

Bugsy McGurk

Bugsy McGurk

President
“Free speech is an endangered species. Those ‘intolerants’ hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us,” Palin said through a word salad.

She also called herself “a freedom of speech kind of gal.”

She sure wasn't singing that tune when Martin Bashir said something about her. She ranted about that endlessly.

Perhaps she thinks "free speech" only applies to racist, homophobic comments?

;-)
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
“Free speech is an endangered species. Those ‘intolerants’ hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us,” Palin said through a word salad.

She also called herself “a freedom of speech kind of gal.”

She sure wasn't singing that tune when Martin Bashir said something about her. She ranted about that endlessly.

Perhaps she thinks "free speech" only applies to racist, homophobic comments?

;-)
Click to expand...

Yes, indeed, that is precisely how Palin and Republican Brained Ones Think. They are hypocritial and double standard bearers and it is obvious their brains were put in backwards and inside-out.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
“Free speech is an endangered species. Those ‘intolerants’ hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us,” Palin said through a word salad.

She also called herself “a freedom of speech kind of gal.”

She sure wasn't singing that tune when Martin Bashir said something about her. She ranted about that endlessly.

Perhaps she thinks "free speech" only applies to racist, homophobic comments?

;-)
Click to expand...
Palin didn't convince Bashir to resign, he did that himself. Error #1.
Error #2 is conflating stated Biblical beliefs with targeted unwarranted hate speech and misogyny.

Ho-hum, just another day in Lib lala land.
 
Bashir called Sarah Palin by name....it wasn't just a general comment. And it was televised in front of his audience. Nobody asked his opinion, he just ranted about it on his own and showed everyone what a hateful person he is.

Phil made a statement of his opinion, never mentioning names of anyone. He was asked the question and he answered it truthfully. This was in an interview, not on his program. I could maybe see people getting mad if he'd said it on their show where millions were watching it. But that wasn't the case. Was he supposed to lie about his belief when asked? He didn't call to have anyone executed did he?

I don't believe in anyone loosing their jobs over something they say. In Bashir's case, or Baldwin's, they shouldn't have been fired for speaking their minds. If people don't like what someone does or says, then they will quit watching them and they will eventually loose their followers and ultimately loose their jobs on their own.
 
Dino said:
Palin didn't convince Bashir to resign, he did that himself. Error #1.
Error #2 is conflating stated Biblical beliefs with targeted unwarranted hate speech and misogyny.

Ho-hum, just another day in Lib lala land.
Click to expand...

Translation: You are correct sir. Hypocrisy off the scale. Palin did not go to bat for Bashir's free speech rights. She relentlessly bashed him for what he said. And when he got canned ("forced to resign") she did not lament the penalty he paid for exercising his free speech rights. She did not say he should be able to keep his job. She was happy as a dimwitted lark. And she did a complete 180 as to Robertson.

;-)
 
Caroljo said:
Bashir called Sarah Palin by name....it wasn't just a general comment. And it was televised in front of his audience. Nobody asked his opinion, he just ranted about it on his own and showed everyone what a hateful person he is.

Phil made a statement of his opinion, never mentioning names of anyone. He was asked the question and he answered it truthfully. This was in an interview, not on his program. I could maybe see people getting mad if he'd said it on their show where millions were watching it. But that wasn't the case. Was he supposed to lie about his belief when asked? He didn't call to have anyone executed did he?

I don't believe in anyone loosing their jobs over something they say. In Bashir's case, or Baldwin's, they shouldn't have been fired for speaking their minds. If people don't like what someone does or says, then they will quit watching them and they will eventually loose their followers and ultimately loose their jobs on their own.
Click to expand...


It's true that Robertson slimed an entire category of people - blacks and gays - not just one person, but that hardly makes his hate speech less harmful. And it's immaterial to the "free speech" gibberish that Palin spewed. She's a raging hypocrite, as are nearly all Pugs.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
Translation: You are correct sir. Hypocrisy off the scale. Palin did not go to bat for Bashir's free speech rights. She relentlessly bashed him for what he said. And when he got canned ("forced to resign") she did not lament the penalty he paid for exercising his free speech rights. She did not say he should be able to keep his job. She was happy as a dimwitted lark. And she did a complete 180 as to Robertson.

;-)
Click to expand...
You're wrong and you know it. You want us to believe that you can't tell the difference between a statement of religious beliefs and a personally targeted misogynistic attack?

You know no one's buying that right?
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
“Free speech is an endangered species. Those ‘intolerants’ hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us,” Palin said through a word salad.

She also called herself “a freedom of speech kind of gal.”

She sure wasn't singing that tune when Martin Bashir said something about her. She ranted about that endlessly.

Perhaps she thinks "free speech" only applies to racist, homophobic comments?

;-)
Click to expand...

Mr. Gurk,

Phil Robertson didn't say anything vile nor offensive.

Hope that little clarification helps.
 
Dino said:
You're wrong and you know it. You want us to believe that you can't tell the difference between a statement of religious beliefs and a personally targeted misogynistic attack?

You know no one's buying that right?
Click to expand...

It goes without saying that you "like Robertson's speech better."

That's not the point. The point is Palin's off-the-chart hypocrisy.
 
ya-ta-hey said:
Mr. Gurk,

Phil Robertson didn't say anything vile nor offensive.

Hope that little clarification helps.
Click to expand...

Many blacks surely consider it to be vile and offensive, as well as straight whites who are not racists.

But the essence of the concept of free speech is to defend speech one disagrees with. This is a concept totally lost on Palin and all hypocritical Pugs. It is not a defense to the charge of hypocrisy to say "I liked Robertson's comments better."
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
It goes without saying that you "like Robertson's speech better."

That's not the point. The point is Palin's off-the-chart hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
And I'm telling you it's no such thing. You seem to know that, or you'd make a cogent argument for actual 'hypocrisy'.

Else you're simply streeeetching quite a bit.

stretch-armstrong-responsive-622x419.jpg
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
“Free speech is an endangered species. Those ‘intolerants’ hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his personal opinion are taking on all of us,” Palin said through a word salad.

She also called herself “a freedom of speech kind of gal.”

She sure wasn't singing that tune when Martin Bashir said something about her. She ranted about that endlessly.

Perhaps she thinks "free speech" only applies to racist, homophobic comments?

;-)
Click to expand...

Palin wanted an apology but an interview I watched she said he was free to say what he wanted.

I think you are getting what news shows said about Bashir confused with what she said
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
Many blacks surely consider it to be vile and offensive, as well as straight whites who are not racists.

But the essence of the concept of free speech is to defend speech one disagrees with. This is a concept totally lost on Palin and all hypocritical Pugs. It is not a defense to the charge of hypocrisy to say "I liked Robertson's comments better."
Click to expand...

Wasilla Sarah is nothing but a "media vulture", lying in wait for putrid rotting carcasses such as this one. She's not unique. We have this type across our spectrum.
 
Bugsy McGurk said:
Translation: You are correct sir. Hypocrisy off the scale. Palin did not go to bat for Bashir's free speech rights. She relentlessly bashed him for what he said. And when he got canned ("forced to resign") she did not lament the penalty he paid for exercising his free speech rights. She did not say he should be able to keep his job. She was happy as a dimwitted lark. And she did a complete 180 as to Robertson.



;-)
Click to expand...


Do you have an example of her "free speech bashing"?

I believe your hatred of her has confused her with news programs talking about bashir.

Do you have a link?
 
The current Korean Kim says some really stupid things. You'd be hardpressed to find any North Koreans who're criticizing Kim for what he says.

So....do North Koreans enjoy more freedom of speech than we do?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top