New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Hillary Clinton President of California.....bwahahaha

justoffal said:
Well it looks like California went big for Clinton....so let them have her....
She can figure out how to support all the deadbeats without the federal Treasury.

Trump actually won the popular vote if you remove California...

https://www.google.com/amp/heavy.co...ted-ballots-new-york-update-totals-final/amp/
Click to expand...



California contributed more than 10% of Clinton’s overall popular vote tally. Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.

Yeah, But California is 12% of the US population. So it's still under represented even from that perspective.

And I bet I can remove 10 percent of Trumps voters or 12 percent of the population in selected red area and Trump would lose the popular and electoral college vote.
 
Spamature said:
California contributed more than 10% of Clinton’s overall popular vote tally. Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.

Yeah, But California is 12% of the US population. So it's still under represented even from that perspective.

And I bet I can remove 10 percent of Trumps voters or 12 percent of the population in selected red area and Trump would lose the popular and electoral college vote.
Click to expand...

Day late and dollar short.........Nov. 8th is history............YOU LOST

California sure welcome to her.........................
 
Dawg said:
Day late and dollar short.........Nov. 8th is history............YOU LOST

California sure welcome to her.........................
Click to expand...

Contribute or it the bricks, people are trying to discuss the topic if you don't mind.
 
Spamature said:
California contributed more than 10% of Clinton’s overall popular vote tally. Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.

Yeah, But California is 12% of the US population. So it's still under represented even from that perspective.

And I bet I can remove 10 percent of Trumps voters or 12 percent of the population in selected red area and Trump would lose the popular and electoral college vote.
Click to expand...

California and 3 or 4 other states are the reasons we still have the Electoral College....those few states would decide on all elections and the rest would literally have no say in it. But of course liberals are all good with that!
 
Spamature said:
California contributed more than 10% of Clinton’s overall popular vote tally. Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.

Yeah, But California is 12% of the US population. So it's still under represented even from that perspective.

And I bet I can remove 10 percent of Trumps voters or 12 percent of the population in selected red area and Trump would lose the popular and electoral college vote.
Click to expand...
@justoffal
I can remove illegals and their anchor babies (who aren't demonstrably citizens yet) from California and Trump won the popular vote.
 
Caroljo said:
California and 3 or 4 other states are the reasons we still have the Electoral College....those few states would decide on all elections and the rest would literally have no say in it. But of course liberals are all good with that!
Click to expand...
But the minimum number of large states it takes to win the Electoral College will also contain the majority of our nation's population.
 
resident_evil said:
@justoffal
I can remove illegals and their anchor babies (who aren't demonstrably citizens yet) from California and Trump won the popular vote.
Click to expand...

The father of your 2012 nominee was not born in this country. So it's total hypocrisy to say that people born in this country to parents who weren't do not have the right to participate in their country's political process.
 
Spamature said:
The father of your 2012 nominee was not born in this country. So it's total hypocrisy to say that people born in this country to parents who weren't do not have the right to participate in their country's political process.
Click to expand...
Actually, by law, one U.S. citizen parent imparts natural born citizenship whether here or abroad. Two illegals having a baby in the U.S. legally arguably did not birth a U.S. citizen. Look up the laws.
 
resident_evil said:
Actually, by law, one U.S. citizen parent imparts natural born citizenship whether here or abroad. Two illegals having a baby in the U.S. legally arguably did not birth a U.S. citizen. Look up the laws.
Click to expand...

As opposed to the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution ?

Yeah, right....
 
Spamature said:
As opposed to the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution ?

Yeah, right....
Click to expand...

Yeah, how come the 14th didn't cover these Americans?

Indian Citizenship Act

The text of the 1924 Indian Citizenship Act (43 U.S. Stats. At Large, Ch. 233, p. 253 (1924)) reads as follows:

BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and house of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all non citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States be, and they are hereby, declared to be citizens of the United States: Provided That the granting of such citizenship shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of any Indian to tribal or other property."

Approved, June 2, 1924. June 2, 1924. [H. R. 6355.] [Public, No. 175.]

That is because the first item of the 14th reads as follows.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State ...

Note the red line as it reads two illegal aliens are NOT subject to the jurisdiction (nor is anchor baby) of the U.S. AND is the keyword that reveals the true meaning of the wording or the wording would have been OR. "AND" implies somebody can be born or naturalized in the United State and NOT be subject to the jurisdiction of.
 
Spamature said:
California contributed more than 10% of Clinton’s overall popular vote tally. Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.

Yeah, But California is 12% of the US population. So it's still under represented even from that perspective.

And I bet I can remove 10 percent of Trumps voters or 12 percent of the population in selected red area and Trump would lose the popular and electoral college vote.
Click to expand...

What you're trying to do is erase the states....can't do it. This is the UNITED STATES not the nation of North Pnagea.

JO
 
resident_evil said:
Yeah, how come the 14th didn't cover these Americans?

Indian Citizenship Act

The text of the 1924 Indian Citizenship Act (43 U.S. Stats. At Large, Ch. 233, p. 253 (1924)) reads as follows:

BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and house of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all non citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States be, and they are hereby, declared to be citizens of the United States: Provided That the granting of such citizenship shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of any Indian to tribal or other property."

Approved, June 2, 1924. June 2, 1924. [H. R. 6355.] [Public, No. 175.]

That is because the first item of the 14th reads as follows.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State ...

Note the red line as it reads two illegal aliens are NOT subject to the jurisdiction (nor is anchor baby) of the U.S. AND is the keyword that reveals the true meaning of the wording or the wording would have been OR. "AND" implies somebody can be born or naturalized in the United State and NOT be subject to the jurisdiction of.
Click to expand...

You're born here. You are issued a birth certificate. That is a legal piece of identification as citizen who is subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
 
Spamature said:
You're born here. You are issued a birth certificate. That is a legal piece of identification as citizen who is subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
Click to expand...
ha ha ha ha ha
Wrong again there, spammy, a birth certificate is not necessarily a citizenship document. At least one parent has to be a legal permanent resident or citizen for a child to be a citizen.

You continuously advocate for lawlessness.

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/illegal-alien-birthright-citizenship-is-a-farce.97991/
 
justoffal said:
What you're trying to do is erase the states....can't do it. This is the UNITED STATES not the nation of North Pnagea.

JO
Click to expand...

Illinois and Massachusetts combined give Clinton a nearly 2million vote lead over Trump and their combined number of votes is less than 75% of California's right now. . There are states that went for Trump at a higher percentage rate than California did for Clinton. You're really just attacking California for its size
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top