New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

How Convienient

With the report just released by an independent committee the picture painted is a scathing accusation against the State Department. This has resulted in four high ranking officials at that agency loosing their jobs. Benghazi was a nightmare for the president especially during his campaign for reelection. But true to form Obama handled it brilliantly. He knew he had to delay the truth beyond the election or it may have been potentially damaging to his chances of reelection.
Early on it was clear that facts were to be disregarded, an expert at deceit and to insure complete confusion, the president summoned Ms. Rice his ambassador to the UN to completely con-volute the situation by deliberately miss leading everyone with statements on national news programs that she knew to be false. Other tactics involved refusing to make any comment sighting that it was an on going investigation, which bought the president more time. Time is all he needed.
Now as further investigations have taken place the picture began to focus. Serious issues concerning security and denials for security assistance in Benghazi have emerged. Where was Hillary in all of this? As accusations of a cover up began to take shape Hillary suddenly emerged to state that she took full responsibility, which we all knew was not at all the actual truth, she had been in another country when this all went down, nice jester taking the fall, far from fact. Nice try, no cigar.
Hillary was scheduled to testify this week in Washington about what really happened in Benghazi. She somehow became suddenly ill, probably from the tremendous volume of wine and champagne she drank while partying in Australia while these events transpired. Then came the claims of a stomach worm, diarrhea, severe gas, farting, bloating , then she suddenly got dehydrated, became dizzy, was staggering, hallucinating and delirious as she spun around, then did a back flip, passed out, on the way down she bumped her head and got a concussion. Like the Church Lady says, " How Convenient". Now it appears that two of her deputies will testify in her place.
If you carefully examine how this entire situation was actually handled by the White House it was brilliant. It has every earmark of the far far left wing progressive socialist political agenda. First, deny, initially the administration openly denied it was a terrorist attack, it was all blamed on a bogus video tape and imaginary protesters. Secondly, distort, as it became ever apparent that many of Obama's people were lying, the administration refused comment sighting that the case was under investigation. Thirdly, delay, by dragging their feet and stonewalling the administration bought the precious time Obama needed. Time he disparately needed to control damage to his reelection bid. Fourthly, diminish, now as we watch the antics of the various personalities Obama has thrown under the bus the focus is no longer on Obama but on underlings in this administration. Lastly where we are now, the Blame game, who will be to blame for this fiasco. You can bet your pajamas it will not be the master of disaster, Obama. What of Hillary, she is a smart woman, she knows to stay far, far, away from the fray and to protect her political aspirations in 2016 so she became ill, got dizzy, delirious, farted several times, did a back flip, passed out and banged her head then got a concussion. Thus she could not testify.


Like the Church Lady says, " How Convenient".

The whole thing was handled masterfully, yes, a few folks will be sacrificed, careers ruined, personal integrity destroyed, this is called collateral damage. But I guess that is the price that has to be paid to protect Obama when it becomes, "Convenient". Four Americans dead, and the cover up and lies continue. Incredible, Frigging Unbelievable.
 
Everyone but Winger hacks knew this was the end game of Benghazi all along. How many republicans lost their jobs over all the killings at embassies during the Bush Presidency? Does zero sound about right?
 
Everyone but Winger hacks knew this was the end game of Benghazi all along. How many republicans lost their jobs over all the killings at embassies during the Bush Presidency? Does zero sound about right?


That may in fact be because there was no cover up or endless stream of lies.
 
No, there was no Fox News crusade of hate and bile and lies to push any investigation, because Fox News is the propaganda arm of the Republican Party. That is a simple fact.


What proof of that accusation do you actually have? None is my guess. You simply will not admit that Obama is at the heart of this massive cover up and the reason for it is political gain plain and simple. His administration lied, then stonewalled, then lied again. To buy time and avoid being made a fool of after touting that Al-Qaeda had become a non threat, another lie, during his campaign stops. He could ill afford to have news of another terrorist attack hitting the media during his reelection campaign. It was a well panned and well executed cover up, involving many in his administration.
 
12667_498628703481446_459527351_n.jpg


Tell it to the brain dead Fox followers, rational Americans do not buy into your whack job conspiracy theories. Speaking of proof, you have zero, nada, nothing, to back your assertions, other than wild speculation.
 
Fox and the Right tried to convince the American people it was a "massive cover-up by Obama" for weeks leading up to the election...hoping it would save Romney (See, even they didn't believe their own "Romney landslide" hype).

Now they hope they can turn it into "impeachment fodder".

Didn't work before....won't work in the future.
 
Oh, come on, OG.....you really think the network of "skewed polls" and Karl Rove and "Romney landslides" and Dick Morris....

can't be trusted for truth and accuracy?!?!?!?

:)
 
View attachment 4667


Tell it to the brain dead Fox followers, rational Americans do not buy into your whack job conspiracy theories. Speaking of proof, you have zero, nada, nothing, to back your assertions, other than wild speculation.


It is on every news channel, in fact today hearings are being held on Capital Hill as it is becoming ever more obvious what actually occurred. Face it, Obama is a liar, and a half baked failed community organizer who has surrounded himself with radical communists and socialists to beckon to his every call. The truth will emerge, and my guess is Obama will find the water rather hot.
 
It is on every news channel, in fact today hearings are being held on Capital Hill as it is becoming ever more obvious what actually occurred. Face it, Obama is a liar, and a half baked failed community organizer who has surrounded himself with radical communists and socialists to beckon to his every call. The truth will emerge, and my guess is Obama will find the water rather hot.

klan_tattoo.jpg

This guy says the exact same thing.
 
It is on every news channel, in fact today hearings are being held on Capital Hill as it is becoming ever more obvious what actually occurred. Face it, Obama is a liar, and a half baked failed community organizer who has surrounded himself with radical communists and socialists to beckon to his every call. The truth will emerge, and my guess is Obama will find the water rather hot.

face it, you were born mentally deficient, they raised you to be an idiot, and your handlers at FOX et al made you deranged.
 
Fox and the Right tried to convince the American people it was a "massive cover-up by Obama" for weeks leading up to the election...hoping it would save Romney (See, even they didn't believe their own "Romney landslide" hype).

Now they hope they can turn it into "impeachment fodder".

Didn't work before....won't work in the future.


The issue is not Fox News but good try on diverting the real issue. The issue is who is responsible for the cover up, and as the truth emerges it is my guess ultimately it will be Obama who lies at the heart of the issue, it was Obama who directed Rice to lie on national news programs, that is why he so vehemently had to defend her actions. It was Obama, who sixteen days after the incident continued to make misleading and false statements in front of the UN, we all saw it happen. Obama is a liar, and he did this for political gain, plain and simple.
 
I said- "Now they hope they can turn it into "impeachment fodder".


The proof?

The issue is who is responsible for the cover up, and as the truth emerges it is my guess ultimately it will be Obama who lies at the heart of the issue....


We'lll be hearing it for THREE AND A HALF YEARS....nothing will ever happen, of course, because there's nothing there and Boehner (if he remains Speaker) doesn't want to commit political suicide like Newt did in 1997-98....

but Rightwing Media...and therefore AP.... won't let it go.....they'll go on and on and on and on.

And when the President leaves office (Sorry, no EARLIER than January 20, 2017)....they'll say "Question still swirl around Behghazi-gate and Obama's fault in it" for DECADES to come.

And outside of their little Echo Chamber? People will roll their eyes....sigh....and shake their heads.

ROFLMAO :D
 
I said- "Now they hope they can turn it into "impeachment fodder".


The proof?




We'lll be hearing it for THREE AND A HALF YEARS....nothing will ever happen, of course, because there's nothing there and Boehner (if he remains Speaker) doesn't want to commit political suicide like Newt did in 1997-98....

but Rightwing Media...and therefore AP.... won't let it go.....they'll go on and on and on and on.

And when the President leaves office (Sorry, no EARLIER than January 20, 2017)....they'll say "Question still swirl around Behghazi-gate and Obama's fault in it" for DECADES to come.

And outside of their little Echo Chamber? People will roll their eyes....sigh....and shake their heads.

ROFLMAO :D


You are speculating again there Gordo.
 
You are speculating again there Gordo.

Oh, no....

1. "Benghazi-gate" will NOT lead to the President's impeachment.

2. You WILL spend YEARS attempting to claim it will...or (by 2016) "should have".

3. You'll spend DECADES of your life trying to convince yourself that "If ONLY the American people had known the TRUTH...he NEVER would have been re-elected.....it's got NOTHING to do with the fact my viewpoint was the MINORITY viewpoint....the people who re-elected Obama, who weren't them evil lib'ruls, were just ignorant....while folks like ME knew the truth about how Evvvvvvillllllllll Obama is!!!!!!"

Pretty sad and pathetic....but you doomed to it.
 
Oh, no....

1. "Benghazi-gate" will NOT lead to the President's impeachment.

2. You WILL spend YEARS attempting to claim it will...or (by 2016) "should have".

3. You'll spend DECADES of your life trying to convince yourself that "If ONLY the American people had known the TRUTH...he NEVER would have been re-elected.....it's got NOTHING to do with the fact my viewpoint was the MINORITY viewpoint....the people who re-elected Obama, who weren't them evil lib'ruls, were just ignorant....while folks like ME knew the truth about how Evvvvvvillllllllll Obama is!!!!!!"

Pretty sad and pathetic....but you doomed to it.


I do not want the President impeached, I want him to quit lying to all of us. That includes his budget, foreign affairs, the economy, to real unemployment numbers. Just tell the truth and stop with the class warfare, playing the race card, and blaming everything under the sun. Show some leadership, develop a real and workable budget that actually lowers the debt and lastly quit wasting so much money.
 
Back
Top