New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

how far away is 'intermediate range,'

Citizen

Council Member
The official report, prepared by the medical examiner in Volusia County, Fla., also found that the 17-year-old Martin had one other fresh injury – a small abrasion, no more than a quarter-inch in size – on his left ring finger below the knuckle



So doesn't appear as if his knuckles were bruised or anything, like the ROC has claimed does it.



http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2...ed-from-intermediate-range-autopsy-shows?lite



Only racists support killing black Non-Adults for buying skittles & Tea.
 
Separately, a medical report on Martin’s alleged killer, 28-year-old George Zimmerman, prepared by his personal physician the day after Martin’s shooting in Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26, found that the Neighborhood Watch volunteer suffered a likely broken nose, swelling, two black eyes and cuts to the scalp. That report, first reported Tuesday by ABC News, also was reviewed by NBC News.

So now its a likely broken nose, what the hell does that mean? It's eaither broken or it's not.

So using likely, it is just as likely that it was NOT broken.


it's in the article I linked above.
 
Where did you get this info? I took Intermediate range to mean more than 3 feet but less than 12 feet.


and an intermediate range (200 yard) phase. ...



http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclien....,cf.osb&fp=433f55e2a4872c5d&biw=1600&bih=698

Mr. Citizen,

Thanks for the info. So it is apparent that the gun shot wound was due to a close hand to hand fight:

"There are 4 classifications used to describe a gunshot wound…

Contact: No stippling (powder burn) and powder residue injected deep in the wound.

Near contact: A small intense band of stippling with heavy gunpowder residue injected into the wound.

Intermediate: A variable band of stippling, little to no powder residue injected into the wound.

Distant: No powder burns on the skin or inside the wound."
 
you being a member of a group that has often bemoaned the majoritiy's use of derogatory labels, its gratifying to see you use that word
 
Mr. Citizen,

Thanks for the info. So it is apparent that the gun shot wound was due to a close hand to hand fight:

"There are 4 classifications used to describe a gunshot wound…

Contact: No stippling (powder burn) and powder residue injected deep in the wound.

Near contact: A small intense band of stippling with heavy gunpowder residue injected into the wound.

Intermediate: A variable band of stippling, little to no powder residue injected into the wound.

Distant: No powder burns on the skin or inside the wound."

Those folks have been duped again by the DU crowd describing the distance as intermediate without defining the distance making them think it was a longer distance than forensics actually defines it.
 
LINK
In forensics there are four types of gunshot wound: Contact wound - The muzzle of the gun was applied to the skin at the time of shooting, Close Range - The muzzle of the gun was 6-8 inches away from the skin at shooting, Intermediate Range - The gun was 8 inches to 3.5 feet away, and Distant - The gun was over 3.4 feet away at the time of shooting. In the case of a fatal shooting it is often debated whether it was murder or suicide.


There you have it.
 
Mr. Citizen,

Thanks for the info. So it is apparent that the gun shot wound was due to a close hand to hand fight:

"There are 4 classifications used to describe a gunshot wound…

Contact: No stippling (powder burn) and powder residue injected deep in the wound.

Near contact: A small intense band of stippling with heavy gunpowder residue injected into the wound.

Intermediate: A variable band of stippling, little to no powder residue injected into the wound.

Distant: No powder burns on the skin or inside the wound."

Um link ????
 
Those folks have been duped again by the DU crowd describing the distance as intermediate without defining the distance making them think it was a longer distance than forensics actually defines it.

Agin no link or any supporting evidence, just your word, which sorry has no more validity than the CWW that post here.
 
Back
Top