How To Confuse A Liberal: Sondland Edition

[Deleted member 21794]

We thinking people know what a disaster Sondland was for DemocRATS yesterday.

It really boils down to two choices. We can go by:

1) Sondland says Trump said to talk to Rudy who said Trump said and/or other rumors

or

2) What Trump told Sondland directly when Sondland asked Trump directly.

Obviously, there is only one correct answer to this.

Why are liberals so stupid and/or easily confused? I say it's inherent in every liberal, but TDS is making matters far worse.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

Because Orange man Bad !!!

Why else do you think Schiff had to make a statement after his opening statement- before anything else could be asked.

Basically an end zone dance, before the replay showing it was Nothing

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

We thinking people know what a disaster Sondland was for DemocRATS yesterday.

It really boils down to two choices. We can go by:

1) Sondland says Trump said to talk to Rudy who said Trump said and/or other rumors

or

2) What Trump told Sondland directly when Sondland asked Trump directly.

Obviously, there is only one correct answer to this.

Why are liberals so stupid and/or easily confused? I say it's inherent in every liberal, but TDS is making matters far worse.

“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.po.../gordon-sondland-impeachment-testimony-071708

Great testimony for Trump.

;-)

 

[Deleted member 21794]

“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.po.../gordon-sondland-impeachment-testimony-071708

Great testimony for Trump.

;-)

Thanks for proving my OP and point absolutely true.

Try again. One or two?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Thanks for proving my OP and point absolutely true.

Try again. One or two?

It’s pretty funny how you ask which Trump toady statement is true. No one knows - they all lie. They sit in prison for lying for Trump. But we do know two things are true:

1. What Trump said after his extortion scheme was revealed is irrelevant, and

2. Trump employed bagmen - buffers - to implement his extortion scheme, he orders them not to testify, and Republicans support his obstruction and then try to take advantage of it.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

It’s pretty funny how you ask which Trump toady statement is true. No one knows - they all lie. They sit in prison for lying for Trump. But we do know two things are true:

1. What Trump said after his extortion scheme was revealed is irrelevant, and

2. Trump employed bagmen - buffers - to implement his extortion scheme, he orders them not to testify, and Republicans support his obstruction and then try to take advantage of it.

Translation: Crap.... you got me completely boxed in. Hey, I know what! I'll keep dodging the two options in the OP and just make up my own!

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Translation: Crap.... you got me completely boxed in. Hey, I know what! I'll keep dodging the two options in the OP and just make up my own!

Re-translation: Curses! Foiled again! I thought you would play the “Guess the Trump toady lie” game.

;-)

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Re-translation: Curses! Foiled again! I thought you would play the “Guess the Trump toady lie” game.

;-)

It's quite simple. Option 1 or option 2?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

It's quite simple. Option 1 or option 2?

There’s an echo in here.

How could one possibly know which Trump toady statement is a lie? They all lie. Constantly.

Pay attention.

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

We thinking people know what a disaster Sondland was for DemocRATS yesterday.

It really boils down to two choices. We can go by:

1) Sondland says Trump said to talk to Rudy who said Trump said and/or other rumors

or

2) What Trump told Sondland directly when Sondland asked Trump directly.

Obviously, there is only one correct answer to this.

Why are liberals so stupid and/or easily confused? I say it's inherent in every liberal, but TDS is making matters far worse.

Both can be true at different times.

Look, MAGA Suckers aren't that smart ... they should stop trying to carry water for Putin's Whore and Bitch Trump.

thx

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Both can be true at different times.

Look, MAGA Suckers aren't that smart ... they should stop trying to carry water for Putin's Whore and Bitch Trump.

thx

And right on cue, another confused liberal staggers by. Thanks!

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

Your poorly formed false dichotomy doesn't mean anyone else is confused

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Both can be true at different times.

Look, MAGA Suckers aren't that smart ... they should stop trying to carry water for Putin's Whore and Bitch Trump.

thx

They’re repeating Trump’s laughable “no quid pro” denials after his extortion scheme was foiled. They have no pride.

;-)

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Your poorly formed false dichotomy doesn't mean anyone else is confused

Why do you say it's false? Here, let's try some remedial help. Which is better? Firsthand information or secondhand info and rumors?

Think hard. This one's a toughie.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Why do you say it's false? Here, let's try some remedial help. Which is better? Firsthand information or secondhand info and rumors?

Think hard. This one's a toughie.

There is no firsthand testimony. Trump refuses to testify, and he has ordered his bagmen not to testify. And you applaud his obstruction, no?

 

[Nutty Cortez]

Steve Castor asked Sondland: “Did the president ever tell you personally about pre-conditions for anything?”

Sondland responded, “No.”

Castor asked: “OK, so the president never told you about any preconditions for the aid to be released?”

Again Sondland responded, “No.”

Finally, Castor asked: “The president never told you about any preconditions for a White House meeting?”

Sondland responded, “Personally, no.”

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

How to confuse a liberal...

Tell them there's a smoking gun to impeach Trump in the corner of a round room......

 

[Deleted member 21794]

There’s an echo in here.

How could one possibly know which Trump toady statement is a lie? They all lie. Constantly.

Pay attention.

Which is better? Firsthand info or secondhand?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Which is better? Firsthand info or secondhand?

See my response above when you first asked that question. Ignoring answers and asking the same question again is VERY lame.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

There is no firsthand testimony. Trump refuses to testify, and he has ordered his bagmen not to testify. And you applaud his obstruction, no?

After the failed obstruction scam from the Mueller witch hunt, you seriously want to babble about obstruction?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!