as seen on tv
Senator
Time was, you could count on each political party to stick to its brand. The GOP was “law and order” and balanced budgets. Democrats were “tax and spend”. But Republicans have been edging onto their turf – mismanagement of the economy. In return, Democrats are apparently now road testing their own “armed and dangerous” show car concept.
It’s not just the 700 million (additional, this week) rounds of ammo for Homeland Security. Someone opined that Homeland Security is simply Obama making good his campaign rhetoric to establish a domestic security force. My response to that is we already have the National Guard for that purpose. Doesn’t he trust their loyalty? They’re the guys who are supposed to respond to riots, deter looters, and repel invading threats (if any).
In addition, we have the army, navy, air force and marines. All in uniform. And border patrol agents (do your job please) on land, and the coast guard if threats arrive by sea. The DEA. The FBI. The CIA. And where I live I’m subject to the jurisdiction of the Baltimore city police, the county police, and Maryland State Police.
Whew . . . can you guys please send me a list of all your laws, so I don’t inadvertently break one? That clever book titled “You commit 3 felonies a day” wasn’t much help. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704471504574438900830760842
Wait – someone in the back has his hand up. I’m reminded that when I go on campus I’m subject to arrest by armed campus police. On federal parkland it’s armed US Park Police (like the ones who joined in the fusillade of bullets which killed the unarmed, disoriented driver in DC last year). What – you tell me that housing inspectors are armed? Why on earth . . . ? And transit police? I should have remembered – they’re gunning down unarmed riders in California, aren’t they?
A couple of years ago, I bought lunch for a quartet of Maryland National Guardsmen at a local diner. They were on “weekend maneuvers”. My daughter Dani accused me of doing it because one of the guys was cute. He was, but my motivation was to lead by example. I never fly anywhere, and couldn’t surrender my boarding pass to some needy “warrior”. I thought it might be a nice object lesson (for Dani ) if I picked up lunch for someone who’s working a full time job PLUS giving at least one weekend a month to serve our nation.
Actually, all the guys (and women) in the various forces I’ve identified above are serving our nation. And probably some other groups that have slipped my mind. (Sheriff’s departments? The US Secret Service? Are NASA’s astronauts armed? Ninjas?)
I can’t afford to buy all of you lunch. I already consider myself overtaxed. And perhaps now, “over policed” when I think about the situation more deeply.
In any case, we can no longer blame the republicans for being excessively focused on “law and order”.
The people who claim there is insufficient differentiation between the two parties have a point. And voting “green” probably wouldn’t help. If those guys came to power they’d probably want a fleet armed with solar powered cruise missiles to protect the whales and dolphins, no?
I agree with “Wisconsin” and “Julie” when they say we live in a gun oriented society. I don’t own one. They apparently don’t either. But most weapons actually appear to be in the hands of government agents.
How do we know when this has become excessive? If someone told you that a random country had 18 different armed government units on duty, with overlapping missions, would you guess this was Russia, or the USA?
It’s not just the 700 million (additional, this week) rounds of ammo for Homeland Security. Someone opined that Homeland Security is simply Obama making good his campaign rhetoric to establish a domestic security force. My response to that is we already have the National Guard for that purpose. Doesn’t he trust their loyalty? They’re the guys who are supposed to respond to riots, deter looters, and repel invading threats (if any).
In addition, we have the army, navy, air force and marines. All in uniform. And border patrol agents (do your job please) on land, and the coast guard if threats arrive by sea. The DEA. The FBI. The CIA. And where I live I’m subject to the jurisdiction of the Baltimore city police, the county police, and Maryland State Police.
Whew . . . can you guys please send me a list of all your laws, so I don’t inadvertently break one? That clever book titled “You commit 3 felonies a day” wasn’t much help. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704471504574438900830760842
Wait – someone in the back has his hand up. I’m reminded that when I go on campus I’m subject to arrest by armed campus police. On federal parkland it’s armed US Park Police (like the ones who joined in the fusillade of bullets which killed the unarmed, disoriented driver in DC last year). What – you tell me that housing inspectors are armed? Why on earth . . . ? And transit police? I should have remembered – they’re gunning down unarmed riders in California, aren’t they?
A couple of years ago, I bought lunch for a quartet of Maryland National Guardsmen at a local diner. They were on “weekend maneuvers”. My daughter Dani accused me of doing it because one of the guys was cute. He was, but my motivation was to lead by example. I never fly anywhere, and couldn’t surrender my boarding pass to some needy “warrior”. I thought it might be a nice object lesson (for Dani ) if I picked up lunch for someone who’s working a full time job PLUS giving at least one weekend a month to serve our nation.
Actually, all the guys (and women) in the various forces I’ve identified above are serving our nation. And probably some other groups that have slipped my mind. (Sheriff’s departments? The US Secret Service? Are NASA’s astronauts armed? Ninjas?)
I can’t afford to buy all of you lunch. I already consider myself overtaxed. And perhaps now, “over policed” when I think about the situation more deeply.
In any case, we can no longer blame the republicans for being excessively focused on “law and order”.
The people who claim there is insufficient differentiation between the two parties have a point. And voting “green” probably wouldn’t help. If those guys came to power they’d probably want a fleet armed with solar powered cruise missiles to protect the whales and dolphins, no?
I agree with “Wisconsin” and “Julie” when they say we live in a gun oriented society. I don’t own one. They apparently don’t either. But most weapons actually appear to be in the hands of government agents.
How do we know when this has become excessive? If someone told you that a random country had 18 different armed government units on duty, with overlapping missions, would you guess this was Russia, or the USA?