I called it.

[resident_evil]

My prognostications coming true is a satisfying thing. Below a story linked on Drudge and below that my little ditty.

@JuliefromOhio @Spamature

UNDERCOVER VIDEO: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning,” Algorithms to Censor Opposing Political Opinions

https://www.projectveritas.com/2018...rithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/

 

[Arkady]

My prognostications coming true is a satisfying thing. Below a story linked on Drudge and below that my little ditty.

@JuliefromOhio @Spamature

UNDERCOVER VIDEO: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning,” Algorithms to Censor Opposing Political Opinions

https://www.projectveritas.com/2018...rithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/


View attachment 38208

Isn't it funny people still take James O'Keefe's nonsense seriously, after all the time they've been humiliated by relying on his misinformation?

 

[resident_evil]

Isn't it funny people still take James O'Keefe's nonsense seriously, after all the time they've been humiliated by relying on his misinformation?

And still the WaPo and NYT are more humiliated by their behavior of news shaping and fake stories.

 

[marvin martian]

Isn't it funny people still take James O'Keefe's nonsense seriously, after all the time they've been humiliated by relying on his misinformation?

Did you watch the video?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

My prognostications coming true is a satisfying thing. Below a story linked on Drudge and below that my little ditty.

@JuliefromOhio @Spamature

UNDERCOVER VIDEO: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning,” Algorithms to Censor Opposing Political Opinions

https://www.projectveritas.com/2018...rithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/


View attachment 38208

OK, I gladly give you your props. No problem. But in all fairness my brutha, that wasn't a tough one.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Did you watch the video?

Squawk! Doctored! Squawk! Edited!

Because CNN, MSNBC and others don't edit their interviews. Oh wait a minute...

 

[Arkady]

Did you watch the video?

No. I thought it was O'Keefe's BS site and moved on. I've been burned by his deceptively edited videos enough that I've learned my lesson.

 

[Arkady]

Squawk! Doctored! Squawk! Edited!

Because CNN, MSNBC and others don't edit their interviews. Oh wait a minute...

Editing is fine. Editing for the purpose of causing people to misunderstand what's happening, the way O'Keefe does, isn't.

 

[resident_evil]

OK, I gladly give you your props. No problem. But in all fairness my brutha, that wasn't a tough one.

I'm just adding to my portfolio of such things.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Editing is fine. Editing for the purpose of causing people to misunderstand what's happening, the way O'Keefe does, isn't.

You seem to be confusing O'Keefe and the MSM.

 

[Spamature]

My prognostications coming true is a satisfying thing. Below a story linked on Drudge and below that my little ditty.

@JuliefromOhio @Spamature

UNDERCOVER VIDEO: Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning,” Algorithms to Censor Opposing Political Opinions

https://www.projectveritas.com/2018...rithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/


View attachment 38208

Other large sites use shadow banning for problematic people. They assume that no one is responding to their post and they leave the sit.

I don't know why you tagged me in this post. I don't use Facebook or Twitter.

 

[resident_evil]

Other large sites you shadow banning for problematic people. They assume that no one is responding to their post and they leave.

I think shadow banning is criminal. They take your value and return you nothing without telling you. It is like pick pocketing. You should just ban a person if that is what you in effect want. I support banning. I just leave and never look back. Soon my alternative will be created and I'll have a home. Probably not good in many ways but good in enough.

I predict those shadow banned have a class action suit on their hands as soon as it occurs to some lawyer. And computers are great record keepers. lol

 

[Tor-Pete-O]

I think shadow banning is criminal. They take your value and return you nothing without telling you. It is like pick pocketing. You should just ban a person if that is what you in effect want. I support banning. I just leave and never look back. Soon my alternative will be created and I'll have a home. Probably not good in many ways but good in enough.

I predict those shadow banned have a class action suit on their hands as soon as it occurs to some lawyer. And computers are great record keepers. lol

I truly believe social media is a blight on the world.

I don't Tweeter or Farcebook and never will.

They should be sued .........right out of business

 

[resident_evil]

I don't know why you tagged me in this post. I don't use Facebook or Twitter.

P.S. Simply channeling my inner gypsy to show you my predictive powers. ;0)

 

[Spamature]

P.S. Simply channeling my inner gypsy to show you my predictive powers. ;0)

Shadow banning is a old practice on the internet. You're just now discovering it exist.

 

[resident_evil]

Shadow banning is a old practice on the internet. You're just now discovering it exist.

It's okay that other thread in which I make a 'prediction' is also based on old practice and I didn't discover that it existed either.