New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

IF THIS DOESN'T GIVE YOU PAUSE FOR THOUGHT

Funny....certain lefties (I won't mention that their names are bo, craig, and middleview, amongst others) have an opinion on pretty much EVERYTHING....

Where are they????
 
Nothing will http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/e...ive-reporters-confidential-files-during-raid/

Think we are not living in a totalitarian gestapo controlled state yet?

So a gun nut who wasn't allowed to possess guns got searched? Good!

The document notes that her husband, Paul Flanagan, was found guilty in 1986 to resisting arrest in Prince George’s County. The warrant called for police to search the residence they share and seize all weapons and ammunition because he is prohibited under the law from possessing firearms.
 
So a gun nut who wasn't allowed to possess guns got searched? Good!

The document notes that her husband, Paul Flanagan, was found guilty in 1986 to resisting arrest in Prince George’s County. The warrant called for police to search the residence they share and seize all weapons and ammunition because he is prohibited under the law from possessing firearms.
Did they have reason to believe there was a gun in the house? Or do you even care, just so long as it involves guns?
 
Did they have reason to believe there was a gun in the house? Or do you even care, just so long as it involves guns?

No guns were taken from the household. Just an intensive witch hunt on heresy and a "possible" machine gun part", as an excuse to enter/search/seize personal property and documents exposing federal govt corruption/crimes.

"Hudson said she and her husband knew something was up in February when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives wanted to talk about a purchase Flanagan made about five years ago.
The court documents note that ATF investigators asked Flanagan if he obtained “possible machine gun parts from a Swedish National.” Flanagan responded that he once purchased a potato gun but threw it away because it didn’t work.
In July, according to the documents, Bosch interviewed several of Flanagan’s Coast Guard colleagues, who said Flanagan spoke often about being a “firearms collector.”"


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/e...confidential-files-during-raid/#ixzz2ikIfnVyI

So what do we have.....?

A bogus search warrant obtained by TheDC indicates that the August raid of a veteran Washington Times investigative reporter allowed law enforcement to search for firearms inside her home. And get this... ALL because her HUSBAND is prohibited under the law from possessing firearms because he was found guilty in 1986 to resisting arrest.

However...

Instead of walking out with firearms as allowed under the warrant, federal agents confiscated a batch of documents that contained information about sources inside the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration. That means federal agents just committed a felony!

There is no doubt we have a criminal federal govt and Police State.

But nobody cares. How about them Chiefs?
 
Did they have reason to believe there was a gun in the house? Or do you even care, just so long as it involves guns?

Yes, they did.

“One party that was interviewed remembered distinctly about Flanagan advising he had recently purchased a Bersa .380 handgun, and observed pictures of firearms similar to AK-47 semi-automatic rifles which were identified by Flanagan as being his,” court documents obtained by Pappas say.

http://rt.com/usa/swat-raid-journalist-hudson-735/
 
Did they have reason to believe there was a gun in the house? Or do you even care, just so long as it involves guns?
Other than the husband was a "Felon" and not allowed to own guns. that was the excuse for the warrant which got them through the door according to the article the warrant did not specify searching for papers. As to whether there were any on the prem or any found I have no idea.
 
No guns were taken from the household. Just an intensive witch hunt on heresy and a "possible" machine gun part", as an excuse to enter/search/seize personal property and documents exposing federal govt corruption/crimes.

And all because of misdemeanor that occurred 30yrs ago no American is allowed to own a gun?

"Hudson said she and her husband knew something was up in February when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives wanted to talk about a purchase Flanagan made about five years ago.
The court documents note that ATF investigators asked Flanagan if he obtained “possible machine gun parts from a Swedish National.” Flanagan responded that he once purchased a potato gun but threw it away because it didn’t work.
In July, according to the documents, Bosch interviewed several of Flanagan’s Coast Guard colleagues, who said Flanagan spoke often about being a “firearms collector.”"


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/25/e...confidential-files-during-raid/#ixzz2ikIfnVyI

So what do we have.....?

A bogus search warrant obtained by TheDC indicates that the August raid of a veteran Washington Times investigative reporter allowed law enforcement to search for firearms inside her home. And get this... ALL because her HUSBAND is prohibited under the law from possessing firearms because he was found guilty in 1986 to resisting arrest.

However...

Instead of walking out with firearms as allowed under the warrant, federal agents confiscated a batch of documents that contained information about sources inside the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration. That means federal agents just committed a felony!

There is no doubt we have a criminal federal govt and Police State.

But nobody cares. How about them Chiefs?
Well, I say good for the cops, until the Red Skins change their name I think anything goes. (Tongue firmly stuck in cheek)...
 
Other than the husband was a "Felon" and not allowed to own guns. that was the excuse for the warrant which got them through the door according to the article the warrant did not specify searching for papers. As to whether there were any on the prem or any found I have no idea.

He was NOT a felon! he was convicted of misdemeanor crime 30 years ago. Although the federal govt commits thousands of felonies everyday (and brags about it), is allowed to bear arms against its citzenry... Go figure!
 
Last edited:
Yes, they did.

“One party that was interviewed remembered distinctly about Flanagan advising he had recently purchased a Bersa .380 handgun, and observed pictures of firearms similar to AK-47 semi-automatic rifles which were identified by Flanagan as being his,” court documents obtained by Pappas say.

http://rt.com/usa/swat-raid-journalist-hudson-735/
since they didn't find any guns, then I say they tell us just who this is.

“One party that was interviewed
 
Yes, they did.

“One party that was interviewed remembered distinctly about Flanagan advising he had recently purchased a Bersa .380 handgun, and observed pictures of firearms similar to AK-47 semi-automatic rifles which were identified by Flanagan as being his,” court documents obtained by Pappas say.

http://rt.com/usa/swat-raid-journalist-hudson-735/

So, according to crony progressives... an intensive witch hunt based on heresy and a "possible" machine gun part? is probable cause to SWAT TEAM a citizen because he's not allowed (in that State) to own a firearm because of misdemeanor that occurred 30yrs ago?

Progressives are going to make excellent slaves in POLICE STATE USA.. be sure to lick their boots properly Bo
 
since they didn't find any guns, then I say they tell us just who this is.

“One party that was interviewed

It is obvious the gun warrant raid was an excuse used by our criminal central govt to confiscate the veteran journalist contacts in Homeland Security.
 
He was NOT a felon! he was convicted of misdemeanor crime 30 years ago. Although the federal govt commits thousands of felonies everyday (and brags about it), is allowed to bear arms against its citzenry... Go figure!
Sorry I mis read the article
 
Back
Top