New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

In the Kavanaugh case the FBI needs the therapist's complete notes...

... on Ford's therapy sessions and on other contemporary patients in order to do a paper and ink analysis to verify the notes aren't forged and to determine Ford's state of mental health and whether it could lead to making false allegations in order to redirect her therapy.
 
... on Ford's therapy sessions and on other contemporary patients in order to do a paper and ink analysis to verify the notes aren't forged and to determine Ford's state of mental health and whether it could lead to making false allegations in order to redirect her therapy.
Okay. And what will the FBI need to do with Kavanaugh?
 
it's why therapist's make notes/recordings...……….they dealing with fruitcakes...…..like Ford
 
... on Ford's therapy sessions and on other contemporary patients in order to do a paper and ink analysis to verify the notes aren't forged and to determine Ford's state of mental health and whether it could lead to making false allegations in order to redirect her therapy.
That would require a full FBI investigation into this matter before Dr. Ford testifies, right?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html


"The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault says the FBI should investigate the incident before senators hold a hearing on the allegations.

"In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and obtained by CNN's 'Anderson Cooper 360,' Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys argue that 'a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions.'"
 
That would require a full FBI investigation into this matter before Dr. Ford testifies, right?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html


"The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault says the FBI should investigate the incident before senators hold a hearing on the allegations.

"In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and obtained by CNN's 'Anderson Cooper 360,' Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys argue that 'a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions.'"
Do you think Ford will agree to opening up her therapy sessions to public scrutiny? Do you think the therapist is willing to share other patient material?
 
... on Ford's therapy sessions and on other contemporary patients in order to do a paper and ink analysis to verify the notes aren't forged and to determine Ford's state of mental health and whether it could lead to making false allegations in order to redirect her therapy.
What crime was committed that would facilitate the need of the FBI? And why should we trust the FBI?
 
Do you think Ford will agree to opening up her therapy sessions to public scrutiny? Do you think the therapist is willing to share other patient material?
Why should Ford open her therapy sessions to public scrutiny; she's calling for the FBI to reopen Kavanaugh's background investigation which might include their scrutiny of Ford's therapy sessions.

Do you think Mark Judge and Patrick J. Smith are willing to share their recollections of the alleged rape under oath in public?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/pj-smyth-brett-kavanaugh/index.html
 
What crime was committed that would facilitate the need of the FBI? And why should we trust the FBI?
Why would you trust an admitted pussy grabber to nominate a non-rapist to SCOTUS?
76b335cf1d3b138c2b1996018d8045be.jpg
 
Why should Ford open her therapy sessions to public scrutiny; she's calling for the FBI to reopen Kavanaugh's background investigation which might include their scrutiny of Ford's therapy sessions.
The public record is for all to judge the rightness of governments acts.

Do you think Mark Judge and Patrick J. Smith are willing to share their recollections of the alleged rape under oath in public?

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/pj-smyth-brett-kavanaugh/index.html

Why do they have to? They just have to put forth a statement that they don't recollect anything on the matter. That is easy compared to opening up your therapy sessions.

Fact is Ford is a day late and a dollar short no matter how wrongly Anderson Cooper tries to characterize the situation.
 
I understand the point that you are trying to make. But let's cut through all the crap. She said she thought her attacker was going to kill her when she escaped why didn't she go to the police?
I'm not going to argue it. I've said clearly that she has alleged a 17 year old drunk boy groped her at a house party (She doesn't even say he tried to kill her but feared he might by accident because he was drunk). End of story as far as I'm concerned.
 
Back
Top