Interesting PDF Document......

[Zam-Zam]

.....for your perusal. I doubt it will get much press, but you never know:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf

 

[Wahbooz]

.....for your perusal. I doubt it will get much press, but you never know:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf

Regardless of the outcome, if this suit goes through, it just may sink immunity for politicians. Government immunity is something that should have never been allowed.

 

[RickWA]

Regardless of the outcome, if this suit goes through, it just may sink immunity for politicians. Government immunity is something that should have never been allowed.

Agreed. Regardless of party, politicians should have MORE scrutiny - not less...and GREATER accountability.

 

[Wahbooz]

Agreed. Regardless of party, politicians should have MORE scrutiny - not less...and GREATER accountability.

A dozen thunbs up!!!!

 

[Barbella]

.....for your perusal. I doubt it will get much press, but you never know:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf

They better hire body guards... lots of them!

 

[Spamature]

Regardless of the outcome, if this suit goes through, it just may sink immunity for politicians. Government immunity is something that should have never been allowed.

Would that be good ? Could you sue a president for order men into battle or sending them on missions. How about sending troops into Pakistan to kill OBL ? That order most certainly violated the sovereignty of that nation in order to conducted what was essentially an assassination.

Should his relatives be allowed to sue ?

 

[Spamature]

.....for your perusal. I doubt it will get much press, but you never know:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf

Is there evidence that the group responsible obtain information of Stevens whereabouts from Clinton emails ?

 

[Wahbooz]

Would that be good ? Could you sue a president for order men into battle or sending them on missions. How about sending troops into Pakistan to kill OBL ? That order most certainly violated the sovereignty of that nation in order to conducted what was essentially an assassination.

Should his relatives be allowed to sue ?

I don't think any politicians should be shielded by a blanket immunity. If they break the law, they break the law. If they violate an agreement, they should be sued like anyone who breaks a law or agreement.

 

[Spamature]

I don't think any politicians should be shielded by a blanket immunity. If they break the law, they break the law. If they violate an agreement, they should be sued like anyone who breaks a law or agreement.

But no one who has seen all the evidence is saying that Clinton broke the law. It seems to me that they want to blame her and say she was responsible for that embassy being attacked and their son being killed in that attack. And they are basing it on what could have possibly happened. Even though again it was investigated by congress 8 times with each and every investigation clearing her of responsibility and the FBI saying there is no evidence her email was hacked. It does not look like the kind of case you would want to use to base holding politicians responsible.

 

[Wahbooz]

But no one who has seen all the evidence is saying that Clinton broke the law. It seems to me that they want to blame her and say she was responsible for that embassy being attacked and their son being killed in that attack. And they are basing it on what could have possibly happened. Even though again it was investigated by congress 8 times with each and every investigation clearing her of responsibility and the FBI saying there is no evidence her email was hacked. It does not look like the kind of case you would want to use to base holding politicians responsible.

Read my lips. Politicians should not be shielded from prosecution. NO ONE is above the law. Guilt or innocence is determined by a court of law, if there is a suit.

 

[Spamature]

Read my lips. Politicians should not be shielded from prosecution. NO ONE is above the law. Guilt or innocence is determined by a court of law, if there is a suit.

Not from criminal acts, no. But there is not criminal act here is all I am saying.

 

[Wahbooz]

Not from criminal acts, no. But there is not criminal act here is all I am saying.

Whether a criminal act is or was committed, that is for a court to determine. If the defense is upheld then there was none, if not there was. It doesn't matter who the politician is. If you start playing favorites, then there is no justice.

 

[Jen]

.....for your perusal. I doubt it will get much press, but you never know:

http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/160808-Final Complaint .pdf

Good.
This spells out every little detail.
It's not a partisan thing. It is truth and lie.
I hope this comes to court soon, but even if it's not until later, fine.
Those parents and their lawyers need security. The Clintons are known to kill those that do things like this to them.

 

[Jen]

They better hire body guards... lots of them!

Oh yes. The parents as well as the lawyers prosecuting their case...........especially the lawyers. The Clinton Crime Family has killed many people for much less reason.

 

[Saladin2]

Oh yes. The parents as well as the lawyers prosecuting their case...........especially the lawyers. The Clinton Crime Family has killed many people for much less reason.

Your insane

 

[Spamature]

Whether a criminal act is or was committed, that is for a court to determine. If the defense is upheld then there was none, if not there was. It doesn't matter who the politician is. If you start playing favorites, then there is no justice.

The FBI and Justice dept already decided there was no criminal act. Here they are looking for civil liability. If we can sue presidents, agency secretaries, and legislators personally for the decision they make. Then expect for all of them to be sued because every decision is going to harm someone in one way or another.

 

[Wahbooz]

The FBI and Justice dept already decided there was no criminal act. Here they are looking for civil liability. If we can sue presidents, agency secretaries, and legislators personally for the decision they make. Then expect for all of them to be sued because every decision is going to harm someone in one way or another.

then let them defend their actions.

 

[Spamature]

then let them defend their actions.

And the measure passes by a vote of 2 for and 1 against with 432 members abstaining.

 

[Wahbooz]

And the measure passes by a vote of 2 for and 1 against with 432 members abstaining.

?

 

[Spamature]

?

If you were to make lawmakers personally liable for their decisions the vast majority would avoid making any.