New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Is the TeaParty ISIS's cell in the US ?

Spamature

President
Is it a coincidence that just as ISIS starts threatening our leaders and our malls and places of gathering. The tea party is blocking the funding of the DHS ?

Sure it could be reasoned that the two groups would take different tact on how the used an attack on American soil. But their motivations and agendas really fundamentally the same. They both hate this President and deeply want to use terrorist attacks in propaganda aimed at furthering their goals of attaining more followers and expanding the reach of their respective cults.
 
Is it a coincidence that just as ISIS starts threatening our leaders and our malls and places of gathering. The tea party is blocking the funding of the DHS ?

Sure it could be reasoned that the two groups would take different tact on how the used an attack on American soil. But their motivations and agendas really fundamentally the same. They both hate this President and deeply want to use terrorist attacks in propaganda aimed at furthering their goals of attaining more followers and expanding the reach of their respective cults.
I don't think it's possible to pen a more ironically twisted more categorically incorrect and more perfectly anti-reality piece than that. It fails a few basic tests for readability and truthfulness. But I don't even want to just leave it at that. So I'll press on with just one question: name just one way this funding of DHS would make a terrorist attack more easy.
Just one.
 
I don't think it's possible to pen a more ironically twisted more categorically incorrect and more perfectly anti-reality piece than that. It fails a few basic tests for readability and truthfulness. But I don't even want to just leave it at that. So I'll press on with just one question: name just one way this funding of DHS would make a terrorist attack more easy.
Just one.

Forcing personnel to work without pay is a way you lower moral and disincentivize those charged with the job of protecting us from an attack. It fosters the "you get what you pay for" and "don't expect something for nothing" mindset.
 
Is it a coincidence that just as ISIS starts threatening our leaders and our malls and places of gathering. The tea party is blocking the funding of the DHS ?

Sure it could be reasoned that the two groups would take different tact on how the used an attack on American soil. But their motivations and agendas really fundamentally the same. They both hate this President and deeply want to use terrorist attacks in propaganda aimed at furthering their goals of attaining more followers and expanding the reach of their respective cults.

It is more likely that Occupy Wall Street is an ISIS cell.
 
Forcing personnel to work without pay is a way you lower moral and disincentivize those charged with the job of protecting us from an attack. It fosters the "you get what you pay for" and "don't expect something for nothing" mindset.
Really?? Is that from your personal experience or is there a link to such? I think an explanation beyond casting doubt on the professionalism of our security forces is in order.
Got one?
 
Forcing personnel to work without pay is a way you lower moral and disincentivize those charged with the job of protecting us from an attack. It fosters the "you get what you pay for" and "don't expect something for nothing" mindset.
You don't seem to have much confidence in the people that took these jobs to protect us.....what makes you think they're going to do a poor job because they don't get a few paychecks ( which they WILL get eventually, so they're out nothing). Do you think they want to see people murdered if they don't get paid? Do you think they want to see another 9/11 because they didn't get a paycheck? I don't. If that's what they would do, they don't deserve a paycheck anyway.
 
Is it a coincidence that just as ISIS starts threatening our leaders and our malls and places of gathering. The tea party is blocking the funding of the DHS ?

Sure it could be reasoned that the two groups would take different tact on how the used an attack on American soil. But their motivations and agendas really fundamentally the same. They both hate this President and deeply want to use terrorist attacks in propaganda aimed at furthering their goals of attaining more followers and expanding the reach of their respective cults.
It would be nice if you guys would make up your collective mind. Is the TEA Party dead, or are they an evil, all encompassing organization hell bent on the destruction of America as liberals would like to rebuild it?

Your waffling is getting ridiculous.
 
It would be nice if you guys would make up your collective mind. Is the TEA Party dead, or are they an evil, all encompassing organization hell bent on the destruction of America as liberals would like to rebuild it?

Your waffling is getting ridiculous.

Zombies are dead and pretty much are singular in their origin and purpose. Sound a lot like the tea party to me. Zombies wander shamble around looking for brains. The tea party wanders shambles around looking for way to oppose Obama.
 
Last edited:
Really?? Is that from your personal experience or is there a link to such? I think an explanation beyond casting doubt on the professionalism of our security forces is in order.
Got one?

It's human nature. You treat people poorly (like not paying them ) and worse results. The NYPD did something like what I am suggesting in response to something the Mayor said. What was your opinion on that ? Did you denounce them as unprofessional ?
 
Zombies are dead and pretty much are singular in their origin and purpose. Sound a lot like the tea party to me. Zombies wonder around looking for brains. The tea party wonders around looking for way to oppose Obama.
So, in other words, you're just going to run from that obvious conundrum.
 
It's human nature. You treat people poorly (like not paying them ) and worse results. The NYPD did something like what I am suggesting in response to something the Mayor said. What was your opinion on that ? Did you denounce them as unprofessional ?
The mayor stopped paying them? When was this?
You're having trouble keeping the story straight. Something's gone wrong in your squirrel brain- you've forgotten what point you were trying to make.
Not like you had much of a chance to begin with. No program regarding domestic security and not a single organization goes unfunded.
You get points for drama and hyperbole, none for accuracy.
 
So, in other words, you're just going to run from that obvious conundrum.

No the story of tea party's demise has been exaggerated. It draws it strength from the right's obsessive Obama hate. Turns out that's a deeper well than any of us originally believed.
 
Is it a coincidence that just as ISIS starts threatening our leaders and our malls and places of gathering. The tea party is blocking the funding of the DHS ?

Sure it could be reasoned that the two groups would take different tact on how the used an attack on American soil. But their motivations and agendas really fundamentally the same. They both hate this President and deeply want to use terrorist attacks in propaganda aimed at furthering their goals of attaining more followers and expanding the reach of their respective cults.


I suppose you could make the same bizarre argument linking ISIS to the Occupy Wall Street movement - they both want Wall Street obliterated.

I want to stress here for those who have difficulty discerning the difference between a theoretical argument and a factual argument that I am not linking ISIS to Occupy Wall Street - I'm merely using absurdity to illustrate absurdity. No rational sane human is going to take the argument linking ISIS to either OWS or the Tea Party seriously. It's just a fantasy for muddled thinkers.
 
The mayor stopped paying them? When was this?
You're having trouble keeping the story straight. Something's gone wrong in your squirrel brain- you've forgotten what point you were trying to make.
Not like you had much of a chance to begin with. No program regarding domestic security and not a single organization goes unfunded.
You get points for drama and hyperbole, none for accuracy.

No I never said that. But I see you tried to change what I said to create a strawman. No go. I said he said something they didn't like. I can only imagine what the result of not paying them would have been. But since that didn't happen no need to go down that road with the NYPD.

Like I said it would force people essential to security to come to work and even though they are not being paid. And I outline how this effects workers and gave you an example of workers who are responsible for security (NYPD) doing what I said over a different issue that was not as important as being paid for their work.

So there.
 
Last edited:
I suppose you could make the same bizarre argument linking ISIS to the Occupy Wall Street movement - they both want Wall Street obliterated.

I want to stress here for those who have difficulty discerning the difference between a theoretical argument and a factual argument that I am not linking ISIS to Occupy Wall Street - I'm merely using absurdity to illustrate absurdity. No rational sane human is going to take the argument linking ISIS to either OWS or the Tea Party seriously. It's just a fantasy for muddled thinkers.

They did not want Wall Street Obliterated. They wanted action on the plight. All I am saying is that ISIS sure would love our security to be more lax. And the tea party is obliging them with the attempt to hamper DHS by not funding it.
 
They did not want Wall Street Obliterated. They wanted action on the plight. All I am saying is that ISIS sure would love our security to be more lax. And the tea party is obliging them with the attempt to hamper DHS by not funding it.


You're better than this. You have to know that's one of the worst arguments ever, and that it's going nowhere.
 
You're better than this. You have to know that's one of the worst arguments ever, and that it's going nowhere.

The tea party should be better than what they are doing. These constant threats against the entire country unless they get their way is going no where. Yet I don't see you people denouncing it. Especially when they have to power to create legislation that stands on its own and proscribes the things they want done.
 
Back
Top