New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

It's Mueller Time

EatTheRich said:
Mueller exonerated Trump on the charge of conspiracy, by saying he couldn’t prove it. He pointedly refused to do the same on the charge of obstruction.
Click to expand...
No exoneration is never into play. If their is a crime he procedes with legal recourse if not he says nothing
Mueller's use of the word was intended for media talking points and a path to further hearings and end game of impeachment.
IT'S OVER
 
JuliefromOhio said:
1. First, Mueller will remind us of Russia’s social media influence campaign. Facebook identified at least 470 fake accounts that were controlled by the Internet Research Agency — a company allegedly founded and controlled by a Russian “businessman,” Yevgeny Prigozhin, who is so close to dictator Vladimir Putin that his nickname is “Putin’s chef.” These accounts posted more than 80,000 updates between January 2015 and August 2017 that reached as many as 126 million people. The IRA also purchased 3,500 Facebook ads that reached more than 10 million people.

Meanwhile, Twitter identified 3,814 IRA-controlled accounts that likewise reached millions of people with their tweets, retweets and “likes.” Overall, there can be no doubt — none whatsoever— that Russian efforts to reach Americans and influence them were extensive and pervasive.

2. Second, as Mueller will also remind us, two units of the Russian intelligence services breached 29 computers at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and 30 computers at the Democratic National Committee. The Russians siphoned off more than 70 gigabytes of information from the DCCC and stole “hundreds of thousands” of documents from compromised email accounts and networks.
Click to expand...


Hopefully low IQ Droolie didn't do something drastic as a result of the Mueller debacle. She put all her eggs in that basket talking about ratings and TV and blah, blah, blah, and it all backfired in her face. She was here all morning, slobbering, and ranting.....and then the posts started to wane as the reality set in. Her last whimper was early afternoon. We warned her beforehand. These left wingers aren't mentally stable. Hope she is okay.

:D
 
EatTheRich said:
Mueller exonerated Trump on the charge of conspiracy, by saying he couldn’t prove it. He pointedly refused to do the same on the charge of obstruction.
Click to expand...
When did Muller use the word "exonerate" on the charge of conspiracy? He used it numerous times on the charge of obstruction. He cannot exonerate ANYONE, its just a catch phrase that has caught up with Mueller.....finally. He got his ass handed to him yesterday.
 
Last edited:
TBLee said:
LOL Because his job was to find evidence and por

When did Muller use the word "exonerate" on the charge of conspiracy? He used it numerous times on the charge of obstruction. He cannot exonerate ANYONE, its just a catch phrase that has caught up with Mueller.....finally. He got his ass handed to him yesterday.
Click to expand...

That is precisely correct.
 
TBLee said:
When did Muller use the word "exonerate" on the charge of conspiracy? He used it numerous times on the charge of obstruction. He cannot exonerate ANYONE, its just a catch phrase that has caught up with Mueller.....finally. He got his ass handed to him yesterday.
Click to expand...

Not necessary. He said if he could conclude that the president had not committed obstruction, he would have said so. The way he said he could conclude that there was not evidence to support a charge of conspiracy.
 
EatTheRich said:
Not necessary. He said if he could conclude that the president had not committed obstruction, he would have said so. The way he said he could conclude that there was not evidence to support a charge of conspiracy.
Click to expand...
He did not prove guilt, and he cannot exonerate. There is an assumption of innocence until proven guilty. Its the use of the word "exonerate" that got him in trouble.
 
TBLee said:
He did not prove guilt, and he cannot exonerate. There is an assumption of innocence until proven guilty. Its the use of the word "exonerate" that got him in trouble.
Click to expand...

He laid out every element of the offense of obstruction with evidence that it occurred on 5 occasions.
 
Hate I didn't watch "Mueller Time" but post prove it's now Dems crying in their beer time.
 
JuliefromOhio said:
The special prosecutor was not authorized to indict Trump, only to investigate. In fact, DOJ rules say a sitting president cannot be indicted.

Republican Ken Buck: "Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?"

Mueller: "Yes."

Buck: "You believe that you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?"

Mueller: "Yes."
Click to expand...
Good luck with that. No one will care once he's out of office. Only the most obnoxious Trump haters and no one will listen to them.
 
EatTheRich said:
The point is Mueller’s acknowledgement that he found a chargeable offense.
Click to expand...
What was that chargeable offense again? Mueller made no accusation at all of any criminality. A prosecutor either accuses or doesn't accuse. Good lord, give it while you're behind. You are just embarrassing yourself at this point.
 
Mick said:
What was that chargeable offense again? Mueller made no accusation at all of any criminality. A prosecutor either accuses or doesn't accuse. Good lord, give it while you're behind. You are just embarrassing yourself at this point.
Click to expand...

He said he had cause to charge Trump with obstruction after he left office.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top