New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Jogging while black again

EatTheRich said:
So this case of police brutality is supposed to justify the racist murder in Georgia?
Click to expand...
Thank you. Now we know attacking an officer with a knife and getting shot is "police brutality" among some of our more extreme posters. Guess we should all take a knee and disrespect our nation during the national anthem because of this atrocity, too!
 
Mick said:
Thank you. Now we know attacking an officer with a knife and getting shot is "police brutality" among some of our more extreme posters. Guess we should all take a knee and disrespect our nation during the national anthem because of this atrocity, too!
Click to expand...
Yes, it is police brutality when a cop responds to a non-lethal threat he could have easily escaped by simply getting into his cruiser and driving away by escalating to lethal force.
 
EatTheRich said:
Yes, it is police brutality when a cop responds to a non-lethal threat he could have easily escaped by simply getting into his cruiser and driving away by escalating to lethal force.
Click to expand...
LOLOLOLOLOL. Yeah, if he didn't get stabbed in the back first. Unreal the insanity that exists out there.
 
EatTheRich said:
You also stated the opinion that Trayvon Martin had no right to defend himself when chased by a man with a GUN, right?
Click to expand...
Cops have guns. Cops are professional gangbangers. Thus you have the right to attack police when they are observing you or they make you nervous.
Your reasoning is unreasonable as well as unjustified.
 
Dino said:
Cops have guns. Cops are professional gangbangers. Thus you have the right to attack police when they are observing you or they make you nervous.
Your reasoning is unreasonable as well as unjustified.
Click to expand...

I never stated that you have a right to attack police. The person in the TP deserved to be arrested. Not executed without trial on the spot.
 
EatTheRich said:
I never stated that you have a right to attack police. The person in the TP deserved to be arrested. Not executed without trial on the spot.
Click to expand...
And if someone on the street is watching you and you think following you, it’s ok to go back and assault them. But only if they might have a gun.
 
EatTheRich said:
So this case of police brutality is supposed to justify the racist murder in Georgia?
Click to expand...
That wasn't police brutality.

That is exactly what anyone should expect if a rush a cop with a knife. Maybe he was on something and out of his mind, which makes it a tragedy. But the officer did exactly what he was supposed to do.
 
Dino said:
And if someone on the street is watching you and you think following you, it’s ok to go back and assault them. But only if they might have a gun.
Click to expand...
In Florida, a stand your ground state, you have every legal right to confront someone who stalks you, armed with a gun.
 
EatTheRich said:
In Florida, a stand your ground state, you have every legal right to confront someone who stalks you, armed with a gun.
Click to expand...
No one was stalking. And the “scared boy” didn’t know there was any gun involved at all. Not til he assaulted the neighborhood watch guy.
Go on and hatch up a new version. Write your own book of fiction and sell it. But I’m not buying.
 
I'll bet the cop would've used a taser.....if the perp had been white.

And stop being such a crybaby over two racist conservatives hunting down and killing that GA jogger.
 
Dino said:
No one was stalking. And the “scared boy” didn’t know there was any gun involved at all. Not til he assaulted the neighborhood watch guy.
Go on and hatch up a new version. Write your own book of fiction and sell it. But I’m not buying.
Click to expand...
I would say anyone who chases a stranger down a dark street at night and then hunts for them while they try to hide is stalking. A reasonable person would have surmised such a hostile, intoxicated person might have been reaching for a gun when they reached into their pocket.
 
EatTheRich said:
I would say anyone who chases a stranger down a dark street at night and then hunts for them while they try to hide is stalking. A reasonable person would have surmised such a hostile, intoxicated person might have been reaching for a gun when they reached into their pocket.
Click to expand...
I always find embellished stories more gripping too. Don’t release too many of the details, wouldn’t want anyone to steal your work of fiction before publication!
Making up all your own facts would have made you reeeal popular with the other jury members btw.
They’d have kicked your ass off.
 
Dino said:
I always find embellished stories more gripping too. Don’t release too many of the details, wouldn’t want anyone to steal your work of fiction before publication!
Making up all your own facts would have made you reeeal popular with the other jury members btw.
They’d have kicked your ass off.
Click to expand...
“Embellished”? Everything I said is verified. You are the one who has to change the facts to fit your preconceived decision that Zimmerman was within his rights.
 
EatTheRich said:
“Embellished”? Everything I said is verified. You are the one who has to change the facts to fit your preconceived decision that Zimmerman was within his rights.
Click to expand...
NONE of that was. You never found any source that Zimmerman was drunk. It was never established Trayvon hid anywhere.
He never had to, he had an unimpeded path to home. You say he was “chased” when he was being observed while Z was on the phone and then lost sight of him. Then he came back and assaulted Zimmerman and no one knows if Trayvon thought or knew Zimmerman was armed. You literally ADDED all those details.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top