Just Some More Proof that the Left is always wrong.

[Sgt Staples]

Why is it that NeoDemocrats who are basically Liberals, Socialists, Marxists, Communists, Fascists (I think I hit them all) who are all big centralized government proponents can't see facts a realize they are always wrong?

They Bankrupt Walls Street and then blame Bush and the Republicans, when the facts prove that wall street is owned and operated by the Democrat Party.

<<<Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.>>>

Not surprising that they bankrupted Wall Street; Democrats (and Democrat lite Republicans) bankrupted Wall Street, after all they bankrupted Detroit, are bankrupting California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey

Corzine is a perfect example, he makes millions off of Wall Street and moves on to bankrupt New Jersey.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/04/24/pro-business_does_not_mean_pro-market_105292.html

The war on the 2nd amendment is another example because the facts show that the more guns, the less crime.


Virginia: More Guns on the Street Means Less Crime -


Major gun crime collectively dropped for a fourth consecutive year statewide, while firearms sales climbed to a new record in 2012 with 490,119 guns purchased in 444,844 transactions -- a 16 percent rise over 2011, according to federally licensed gun dealer sales estimates obtained by the Richmond Times-Dispatch. -
The proliferation of guns occurred as the total number of major reported crimes committed with all types of firearms in Virginia dropped 5 percent, from 4,618 offenses in 2011 to 4,378 last year, according to Virginia State Police data.
http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2013/08/virginia-more-guns-on-the-street-means-less-crime/

 

[Colorforms]

Why is it that NeoDemocrats who are basically Liberals, Socialists, Marxists, Communists, Fascists (I think I hit them all) who are all big centralized government proponents can't see facts a realize they are always wrong?

They Bankrupt Walls Street and then blame Bush and the Republicans, when the facts prove that wall street is owned and operated by the Democrat Party.

<<<Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.>>>

Not surprising that they bankrupted Wall Street; Democrats (and Democrat lite Republicans) bankrupted Wall Street, after all they bankrupted Detroit, are bankrupting California, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey

Corzine is a perfect example, he makes millions off of Wall Street and moves on to bankrupt New Jersey.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/04/24/pro-business_does_not_mean_pro-market_105292.html

The war on the 2nd amendment is another example because the facts show that the more guns, the less crime.


Virginia: More Guns on the Street Means Less Crime -


Major gun crime collectively dropped for a fourth consecutive year statewide, while firearms sales climbed to a new record in 2012 with 490,119 guns purchased in 444,844 transactions -- a 16 percent rise over 2011, according to federally licensed gun dealer sales estimates obtained by the Richmond Times-Dispatch. -
The proliferation of guns occurred as the total number of major reported crimes committed with all types of firearms in Virginia dropped 5 percent, from 4,618 offenses in 2011 to 4,378 last year, according to Virginia State Police data.
http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2013/08/virginia-more-guns-on-the-street-means-less-crime/

They also essentially owned Fannie and Freddie. All of the high ranking officials in those entities were old Clinton retreads.

 

[GordonGecko]

In six more months, I'm going to have proof ditto-heads are wrong.

 

[GordonGecko]

They also essentially owned Fannie and Freddie. All of the high ranking officials in those entities were old Clinton retreads.

If only Republicans had been able to have control of Congress, House and Senate, and a Republican in the White House back in 2003 to 2006....they could have stopped those rascaly Democrats at Freddie and Fannie. Darn it.

 

[Colorforms]

If only Republicans had been able to have control of Congress, House and Senate, and a Republican in the White House back in 2003 to 2006....they could have stopped those rascaly Democrats at Freddie and Fannie. Darn it.

LOL I know, right? You can't let democrats control anything. They'll just screw it up.

 

[GordonGecko]

LOL I know, right? You can't let democrats control anything. They'll just screw it up.

CF, who was controlling EVERYTHING from 2003 to 2006...as the housing crises loomed???

 

[Colorforms]

CF, who was controlling EVERYTHING from 2003 to 2006...as the housing crises loomed???

Were you not just here for that discussion? Those who ran the housing market were almost entirely democrat.

 

[GordonGecko]

Were you not just here for that discussion? Those who ran the housing market were almost entirely democrat.

Who controlled Congress and the White House from 2003 to 2006....which gave them the ability to control Freddie and Fannie ...if they wanted to???

 

[Colorforms]

Who controlled Congress and the White House from 2003 to 2006....which gave them the ability to control Freddie and Fannie ...if they wanted to???

Ah, so it's Bush's fault democrats ran Freddie and Fannie and the housing market into the ground. LOL

 

[GordonGecko]

CF, can Congress and a President working together NOT control Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae????


or are you saying EVEN IF Republicans get control of the House, the Senate, AND the White House.....they're still IMPOTENT????

 

[Colorforms]

CF, can Congress and a President working together NOT control Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae????


or are you saying EVEN IF Republicans get control of the House, the Senate, AND the White House.....they're still IMPOTENT????

 

[GordonGecko]

Democrats are SUPERMEN, CF.


They can control the US House of Representatives....even when REPUBLICANS are in the majority!!!!!!!

Or is it that Republicans are just so WEAK that even when they hold the majority in the House, majority in the Senate, and the White House....Democrats can still control the Congress and Presidency????

 

[Colorforms]

Democrats are SUPERMEN, CF.


They can control the US House of Representatives....even when REPUBLICANS are in the majority!!!!!!!

Or is it that Republicans are just so WEAK that even when they hold the majority in the House, majority in the Senate, and the White House....Democrats can still control the Congress and Presidency????

"Republicans are weak" seems to be your theme of the day. You're right in the sense that they should have done something to correct the terrible democrat abuse and they didn't.

 

[Craig]

"Republicans are weak" seems to be your theme of the day. You're right in the sense that they should have done something to correct the terrible democrat abuse and they didn't.

But the other thread isn't about the strength of the GOP?...Although it's part of a "theme"...about the strength of the Republicans....written as "Republicans are weak"...right here...in your post.

 

[Boca]

They also essentially owned Fannie and Freddie. All of the high ranking officials in those entities were old Clinton retreads.

Ain't that the truth!

Franklin D. Raines, Bill Clinton's Office of Management and Budget Director; after that Fannie Mae CEO beginning in 1999.

On December 21, 2004 Raines accepted what he called "early retirement" from his position as CEO while U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigators continued to investigate alleged accounting irregularities. He was accused by The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the regulating body of Fannie Mae, of abetting widespread accounting errors, which included the shifting of losses so senior executives, such as himself, could earn large bonuses.

In 2006, the OFHEO announced a suit against Raines in order to recover some or all of the $90 million in payments made to Raines based on the overstated earnings, initially estimated to be $9 billion but have been announced as $6.3 billion.

Civil charges were filed against Raines and two other former executives by the OFHEO in which the OFHEO sought $110 million in penalties and $115 million in returned bonuses from the three accused. On April 18, 2008, the government announced a settlement with Raines together with J. Timothy Howard, Fannie's former chief financial officer, and Leanne G. Spencer, Fannie's former controller dismissing its charges. The three executives maintained their denial of the charges but agreed to the payment of fines totaling about $3 million, which were paid by Fannie's insurance policies.

Fines totaling $3 million? All paid for by Fannie Mae insurance? In 2003 alone Raines raked in over $20 million!

And then there's Jamie Gorelick.....remember her? Deputy Attorney General in the Clinton Administration who wrote the "Wall Memo" that prohibited open communications on terrorism within the FBI......one big reason for lack of sharing intelligence prior to the September 11 attacks.

And then in 1997 she becomes Vice Chairman at Fannie Mae without the word finance on her resume and commences raking in $26 million for her 5 years there.

So....we have two Clinton players in place at Fannie Mae, the CEO and Vice Chairman, when Clinton, through his Housing and Urban Develpment (HUD) department, gets Fannie Mae to agree to up their purchases of subprime loans to 50% of it's total. All of which were securitized and sold globally.

Welcome housing bubble and global financial meltdown....come on in! Ben Bernake can print enough to pay back them foreign banks. Might take a few years but no sweat! Have a seat.

 

[GordonGecko]

"Republicans are weak" seems to be your theme of the day. You're right in the sense that they should have done something to correct the terrible democrat abuse and they didn't.

Seems to be YOUR theme, or theory, CF.

Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House....but are too WEAK to reform Freddie and Fannie because Democrats run the show.

Republican voters are so WEAK and easily manipulated that the "Lib'rul Media" can create a "narrative" and force them to vote for "RINOs" for their Presidential Nominee.

The Republican Party candidates for 2016 are so WEAK....they have to stick to "friendly media" in their debates because they can't "win a game" without "controlling the referees".

Seems like a Party in need of a testosterone shot?

 

[GordonGecko]

But the other thread isn't about the strength of the GOP?...Although it's part of a "theme"...about the strength of the Republicans....written as "Republicans are weak"...right here...in your post.

Interesting admission from CF.....EVEN IF Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House (as they did from 2003 to 2006)....

DEMOCRATS still run the show and the poor, helpless Republicans can't stop them.

So....why vote for Republicans????

 

[Colorforms]

Seems to be YOUR theme, or theory, CF.

Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House....but are too WEAK to reform Freddie and Fannie because Democrats run the show.

Republican voters are so WEAK and easily manipulated that the "Lib'rul Media" can create a "narrative" and force them to vote for "RINOs" for their Presidential Nominee.

The Republican Party candidates for 2016 are so WEAK....they have to stick to "friendly media" in their debates because they can't "win a game" without "controlling the referees".

Seems like a Party in need of a testosterone shot?

Kind of like democrats are too weak to get anything done even though they have 2/3s of the government? Or that they can't fix the economy even though they owned government for 2 years? Or that they couldn't handle a debate on FOX?

Seems your projecting your own inadequacies onto republicans

 

[Sgt Staples]

If only Republicans had been able to have control of Congress, House and Senate, and a Republican in the White House back in 2003 to 2006....they could have stopped those rascaly Democrats at Freddie and Fannie. Darn it.

Not correct. The Republicans never had a filibuster proof majority. and that's exactly what happened. People like Schumer and Dodd who were making millions of the sub prime market, shut down the regulators when they reported to the senate.

 

[GordonGecko]

Kind of like democrats are too weak to get anything done even though they have 2/3s of the government? Or that they can't fix the economy even though they owned government for 2 years? Or that they couldn't handle a debate on FOX?

Seems your projecting your own inadequacies onto republicans

YOU claimed the Media tells GOP primary voters how to vote. YOU claimed the GOP couldn't cut spending or fix Freddie or Fannie, even with full control of Congress and Bush as President.