New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Keeping secrets.

Gramps

Gramps

Mayor
And so, now some former associates of Mitt Romney say he did participate in Bain's affairs after he claims he didn't. The truth does have a way of tripping a fellow up if he stretches it to his advantage. We used to say the cockroaches tend to come out of the woodwork when things are the darkest. Now, what say ye, Mitt? Is everyone a liar but the liar?

Gramps
 
Gramps said:
And so, now some former associates of Mitt Romney say he did participate in Bain's affairs after he claims he didn't. The truth does have a way of tripping a fellow up if he stretches it to his advantage. We used to say the cockroaches tend to come out of the woodwork when things are the darkest. Now, what say ye, Mitt? Is everyone a liar but the liar?

Gramps
Click to expand...



AND?

"so, now some former associates of Mitt Romney say he did participate in Bain's affairs after he claims he didn't."

What exactly is the point you wish to make with this little tid-bit of information, sport?

What does this mean to us normal people? (And by "normal" I mean pretty much anyone who, unlike yourself and the other obaminites on here, are NOT willing to just believe anything we hear about anyone who you believe is a threat to permitting your socialist demi-god obummer from continuing his rape of the US)

Lets see now, on one hand we have Romney and some former associates who say one thing......
On the OTHER hand we have Anti-Romneys and some former associates who say another thing......

Ok. So how is it you come to the conclusion that NOW, since we hear the "other" thing, that "the truth" is out?

What say ye, grumps? Why Is everyone you disagree with assumed to be a liar and everyone saying whatever you want to hear speaks "the truth"?

And don't you be a liar.................
 
You assume a lot when you claim to be part of "us normal people". What makes you think you are? Link, please.

Gramps





UPNYA2 said:
AND?

"so, now some former associates of Mitt Romney say he did participate in Bain's affairs after he claims he didn't."

What exactly is the point you wish to make with this little tid-bit of information, sport?

What does this mean to us normal people? (And by "normal" I mean pretty much anyone who, unlike yourself and the other obaminites on here, are NOT willing to just believe anything we hear about anyone who you believe is a threat to permitting your socialist demi-god obummer from continuing his rape of the US)

Lets see now, on one hand we have Romney and some former associates who say one thing......
On the OTHER hand we have Anti-Romneys and some former associates who say another thing......

Ok. So how is it you come to the conclusion that NOW, since we hear the "other" thing, that "the truth" is out?

What say ye, grumps? Why Is everyone you disagree with assumed to be a liar and everyone saying whatever you want to hear speaks "the truth"?

And don't you be a liar.................
Click to expand...
 
Gramps said:
I'll agree, Doc, but the gist of the game is to NOT be caught lying.

Gramps
Click to expand...

That...OR tell lies that either no one cares about, or...tell lies that people really want to hear...which are the best kind of lies!
 
Gramps said:
I'll agree, Doc, but the gist of the game is to NOT be caught lying.

Gramps
Click to expand...



Ahhhhhhhh.............well there we have it.........I see the problem now.

This isn't a game, and the gist of this is to NOT be caught claiming someone is lying, but proving it....

Which your initial post, "...now some former associates of Mitt Romney say he did participate...", quite simply does NOT do, does it gramps?





Now that we have seen this confusion any chance you might care to withdraw that assertation of lying until someone actually PROVES otherwise?

Or, as I suspect, will you STILL be content to just go with what you "feel"?
 
UPNYA2 said:
Ahhhhhhhh.............well there we have it.........I see the problem now.

This isn't a game, and the gist of this is to NOT be caught claiming someone is lying, but proving it....

Which your initial post, "...now some former associates of Mitt Romney say he did participate...", quite simply does NOT do, does it gramps?





Now that we have seen this confusion any chance you might care to withdraw that assertation of lying until someone actually PROVES otherwise?

Or, as I suspect, will you STILL be content to just go with what you "feel"?
Click to expand...

Someone is lying. One says Romney had no connection. One says Romney had a connection throughout. Both cannot be true. Someone is lying.

So...who benefits from what lie?
 
Craig said:
Someone is lying. One says Romney had no connection. One says Romney had a connection throughout. Both cannot be true. Someone is lying.

So...who benefits from what lie?
Click to expand...


Couldn't tell you.

Kind of why I have refrained from saying anyone is lying about it yet. I didn't say Romney wasn't lying, I merely questioned why it was that when someone else said something different than he said, BAM, gramps assumed that meant Romney was lying.

He may have been, but I will wait and see. Thats just me, not everyone feels they should do that....Obviously.
 
UPNYA2 said:
Couldn't tell you.

Kind of why I have refrained from saying anyone is lying about it yet. I didn't say Romney wasn't lying, I merely questioned why it was that when someone else said something different than he said, BAM, gramps assumed that meant Romney was lying.

He may have been, but I will wait and see. Thats just me, not everyone feels they should do that....Obviously.
Click to expand...

Yeah...suddenly you're a disinterested observer waiting for the facts to make a judgment. Pardon my guffaw.
 
GordonGecko said:
There is POSSIBLY a link between the hidden tax returns and his "I left Bain in 1999" lie.

:)
Click to expand...


I suppose there is at that......

What there simply is NOT, what keeps tripping up everyone so hell bent and determined to find something is the fact that there still is nothing that says Romney has to let his enemies dig through his personal papers, is there?

Face it, gecko, we both know that there are also people who maintain that "there is POSSIBLY a link between" obami's hidden college records and what they claim is his "I was born in the US" lie, don't we?

But you aren't clammering for your worshipped one to let his enemies dig through all of his personal records just in case, are you?

No, you most assuredly are NOT. And please note that neither am I.

There is NO REQUIREMENT to run for or serve as, President of the US that these things violate.

Get over it.
 
UPNYA2 said:
I suppose there is at that......

What there simply is NOT, what keeps tripping up everyone so hell bent and determined to find something is the fact that there still is nothing that says Romney has to let his enemies dig through his personal papers, is there?

Face it, gecko, we both know that there are also people who maintain that "there is POSSIBLY a link between" obami's hidden college records and what they claim is his "I was born in the US" lie, don't we?

But you aren't clammering for your worshipped one to let his enemies dig through all of his personal records just in case, are you?

And not that neither am I.

There is NO REQUIREMENT to run for or serve as, President of the US that these things violate.

Get over it.
Click to expand...

Why not invoke the oh so popular..."If he has nothing to hide" game?

Damn that Romney...George that is, for beginning this trend of financial openness.
 
GordonGecko said:
There is POSSIBLY a link between the hidden tax returns and his "I left Bain in 1999" lie.

:)
Click to expand...

You should read what exactly you just wrote, gecko. You sound like gramps here......

Look close now.......

"There is POSSIBLY a link between the hidden tax returns and his "I left Bain in 1999" lie."

You just labled what he said as being a lie. How do you KNOW it is a 'lie" if you are still looking for a "POSSIBLE" link in his tax papers you don't have?

Why look? Why go with a "POSSIBLY"?
You already said it was a lie, what is that "lie" assertation based upon exactly?

Wait.......let me guess....your libby "feeling", RIGHT? I'm right and we both know it, you don't need crap like a link or a tie, you are a lib and you have your 'beliefs', your gut "feelings", and let's be honest here, that is really all any of you on the left need in order to say whatever you desire about others, isn't it, bud?
 
Wow, so the fundamental and the very root justification for voting FOR Romney is..........
"Everyone is a LIAR." (QUOTE)

Sad.

So sad that the level of apathy is this great within the Republican party that they now justify lying and make it a reason for voting for "their" LIAR. I guess that was the same apathetic reasoning that some of the Germans used when they decided to throw their support for Adolf Hitler too. It has a similar ring to it and speaks volumes as to why some humans would throw their support toward liars, monsters, and unethical, selfish, unconscious dweebs like Romney.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top