Lauren "Handsies Galore" Boebert accused of sex with three staffers in complaint alleging $200K hush payment

[PNWest]

Lauren Boebert accused of sex with three staffers in complaint alleging $200K hush payment

Update: Lauren Boebert's office said Sunday that there is "zero truth" in the allegations, and added that, under House rules, the complaint should not be investigated. "Under House Committee on Ethics Rule 15, a complaint may not be filed within 60 days of an election in which the Member is a...

www.rawstory.com

Wow - I didn't know she was a bi. Guess that doubles her chances at getting some action.

 

[Colorforms]

Lauren Boebert accused of sex with three staffers in complaint alleging $200K hush payment

Update: Lauren Boebert's office said Sunday that there is "zero truth" in the allegations, and added that, under House rules, the complaint should not be investigated. "Under House Committee on Ethics Rule 15, a complaint may not be filed within 60 days of an election in which the Member is a...

www.rawstory.com

Wow - I didn't know she was a bi. Guess that doubles her chances at getting some action.

*gasp* raw story. Then it has to be fore true.

 

[TBLee]

Come on PN…..do better! Or at the very least stop complaining about “Kook site”, when you use then often.
No, Raw Story cannot be classified as a completely reliable, neutral news source, though it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site. Independent media watchdogs generally rate its reliability as mixed. [1, 2]
Whether you can trust it depends entirely on how you use it, based on the following factors:

• • Strong Political Bias: Major media watchdogs like AllSides rate Raw Story's bias as Left. It is a progressive outlet that frames its reporting to fit a specific liberal political agenda.
  • Sensationalism and Clickbait: While Raw Story does employ journalists and conduct some genuine investigative reporting, a large portion of its content relies on highly sensationalized, emotionally charged headlines designed to drive clicks. They often aggregate or re-write reporting originally broken by mainstream outlets.
  • Factual Track Record: It is a NewsGuard-validated website and has a dedicated fact-checking policy. However, because it prioritizes rapid breaking news and aggregation, it has occasionally published major factual errors or misread data that required subsequent retractions or corrections.

The Bottom Line: If you read Raw Story, it should be treated as an opinionated, progressive aggregator. For hard, objective facts, you should cross-reference their articles with neutral wire services like the Associated Press (AP) or Reuters

 

[PNWest]

Come on PN…..do better! Or at the very least stop complaining about “Kook site”, when you use then often.
No, Raw Story cannot be classified as a completely reliable, neutral news source, though it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site. Independent media watchdogs generally rate its reliability as mixed. [1, 2]
Whether you can trust it depends entirely on how you use it, based on the following factors:

• • Strong Political Bias: Major media watchdogs like AllSides rate Raw Story's bias as Left. It is a progressive outlet that frames its reporting to fit a specific liberal political agenda.
  • Sensationalism and Clickbait: While Raw Story does employ journalists and conduct some genuine investigative reporting, a large portion of its content relies on highly sensationalized, emotionally charged headlines designed to drive clicks. They often aggregate or re-write reporting originally broken by mainstream outlets.
  • Factual Track Record: It is a NewsGuard-validated website and has a dedicated fact-checking policy. However, because it prioritizes rapid breaking news and aggregation, it has occasionally published major factual errors or misread data that required subsequent retractions or corrections.

The Bottom Line: If you read Raw Story, it should be treated as an opinionated, progressive aggregator. For hard, objective facts, you should cross-reference their articles with neutral wire services like the Associated Press (AP) or Reuters

The relevant protion of your cut and paste :... it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site."
Here's what google has to say about the story :

Google Search

You can check out the other links to the story there if you wish.

Personally - I just love the salacious stuff.

 

[TBLee]

The relevant protion of your cut and paste :... it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site."
Here's what google has to say about the story :

Google Search

You can check out the other links to the story there if you wish.

Personally - I just love the salacious stuff.

Face it….you used a “kook site”. I don’t recall I ever said the story didn’t have some factual evidence, but it is a kook site and of course the “American muckrakers” are involved. With all your complaining, I would think you would at least attempt to do better.
Why hasn’t any actual “reliable” news source grabbed this story and run with it?

 

[TBLee]

The relevant protion of your cut and paste :... it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site."
Here's what google has to say about the story :

Google Search

You can check out the other links to the story there if you wish.

Personally - I just love the salacious stuff.

Oh and I have no doubt you are enjoying the salacious part of the story. Regardless of if it is factual or not. Enjoy

 

[PNWest]

Face it….you used a “kook site”. I don’t recall I ever said the story didn’t have some factual evidence, but it is a kook site and of course the “American muckrakers” are involved. With all your complaining, I would think you would at least attempt to do better.
Why hasn’t any actual “reliable” news source grabbed this story and run with it?

1) It's not a KOOK site. If you think it is I'm certainly willing to extend my personal invitation to you to curate a website of LEFT WING KOOK SITES which I will host next to my very own famous list. I've even created the template for you - https://pnwest.rf.gd/lwkook.html and will offer any help you may need in getting the site up and running. I've made this offer countless times before but because consevartives are typically gutless and too stupid or lazy to put in the work, to date no one has taken me up on the offer. You, @TBLee may be different. If there is any right winger on this forum actually capable of curating a list like this it would be you. You always seem to have issues with sources that post things that make conservatives look bad, even if the story comes from a site the "... it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site."

So step up to the plate and make the LEFT WING KOOK site directory happen. I know you can do it!

As to the second part of your comment the google search lists several additional sources.

 

[PNWest]

Oh and I have no doubt you are enjoying the salacious part of the story. Regardless of if it is factual or not. Enjoy

I do and I will.

 

[BackAlive]

I do and I will.

This defense of Boebert is from the same crowd that believed anything said about Hunter Biden...Now they have morals..What a joke

 

[TBLee]

1) It's not a KOOK site. If you think it is I'm certainly willing to extend my personal invitation to you to curate a website of LEFT WING KOOK SITES which I will host next to my very own famous list. I've even created the template for you - https://pnwest.rf.gd/lwkook.html and will offer any help you may need in getting the site up and running. I've made this offer countless times before but because consevartives are typically gutless and too stupid or lazy to put in the work, to date no one has taken me up on the offer. You, @TBLee may be different. If there is any right winger on this forum actually capable of curating a list like this it would be you. You always seem to have issues with sources that post things that make conservatives look bad, even if the story comes from a site the "... it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site."

So step up to the plate and make the LEFT WING KOOK site directory happen. I know you can do it!

As to the second part of your comment the google search lists several additional sources.

It is a kook site. But I am enjoying watching your failed attempt at saying otherwise. LOL

 

[TBLee]

I do and I will.

. Thanks for admitting your support “regardless of if it’s factual or not”. Finally

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

This defense of Boebert is from the same crowd that believed anything said about Hunter Biden...Now they have morals..What a joke

They don’t even defend Boebert. They just attack the source and pretend it didn’t happen, even when they have no evidence that the report is false. The usual cultist response to unfavorable reports about their cult leaders.

 

[Dawg]

She's SINGLE

 

[EatTheRich]

The relevant protion of your cut and paste :... it is also not a "fake news" or fabrication site."
Here's what google has to say about the story :

Google Search

You can check out the other links to the story there if you wish.

Personally - I just love the salacious stuff.

I do too. That’s why I watch soap operas. But I try to resist the impulse to satisfy my voyeurism with political gossip. I can’t stand Boebert’s fascist-tinged politics, but once we make everything she does at home sexually with willing partners fodder for the media and for witch-hunt attacks against her, we destroy the expectation of privacy that we have in our own lives and hand another weapon over to the ruling class.

 

[PNWest]

I do too. That’s why I watch soap operas. But I try to resist the impulse to satisfy my voyeurism with political gossip. I can’t stand Boebert’s fascist-tinged politics, but once we make everything she does at home sexually with willing partners fodder for the media and for witch-hunt attacks against her, we destroy the expectation of privacy that we have in our own lives and hand another weapon over to the ruling class.

If I wanna go after Bobo for her loose morals while preaching family values I'll do so. You do you - enjoy your soap operas.

 

[TBLee]

If I wanna go after Bobo for her loose morals while preaching family values I'll do so. You do you - enjoy your soap operas.

Meh…we all sin. We all pretend we are better than others. Do you? Have you never sinned or believe you were superior to others because of your belief? Oh and perhaps think for a bit before responding, as your apparent believe in YOUR superiority is very present on this forum.

 

[Dawg]

If I wanna go after Bobo for her loose morals while preaching family values I'll do so. You do you - enjoy your soap operas.

I'm guessing you were NOT a virgin when you got married

 

[Dawg]

Meh…we all sin. We all pretend we are better than others. Do you? Have you never sinned or believe you were superior to others because of your belief? Oh and perhaps think for a bit before responding, as your apparent believe in YOUR superiority is ver present on this forum.

wonder if her staffers were under her desk!

 

[PNWest]

Meh…we all sin. We all pretend we are better than others. Do you? Have you never sinned or believe you were superior to others because of your belief? Oh and perhaps think for a bit before responding, as your apparent believe in YOUR superiority is very present on this forum.

I've sinned plenty. Let's not get into that or we'll be here all day. Do I believe I'm superior because of my beliefs? - NO. I'm superior not because of my beliefs, not because of my intellect (which you should notice I never brag about or even make claim to having), not because of my devastatingly good looks (at least in MrsPNWest's opinion), but because of my lack of hypocrisy. I always tell it like it is. Always. I'll acknowledge my moral failings. I'll acknowledge when I make a mistake. and hopefully learn from it.

But unlike almost everyone else on this board I'll call out which ever side is doing wrong. You've certainly read my many posts about what a terrible, terrible job Joe Biden did. My anti-Biden comments are legendary. Frankly those of you on the right can only wish to be able formulate some of the stuff I come up with. The nasty comments I post to the people I refer to as BidenBesties™ is pretty close to the venom I post towards the idiots I refer to as TrumpChumps™.

It is no mistake that my superiority is very present on this forum. It should be obvious to any thinking human being. It's present wherever I post.

 

[PNWest]

I'm guessing you were NOT a virgin when you got married

I was not. Nor did I run around pretending to being favor of the kind of "family values" BS the republicans wrap themselves in.