New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

let's get real......about climate change

EatTheRich

President
No, their is no warming, the small, small increase came from "adjusted " numbers from the NOAA.
The increase can be seen using a variety of independent temperature data sets and proxy data. Again, adjustment by NOAA (to deal with the discontinuity of physical thermometers over the many decades) has had the effect of minimizing, not exaggerating, the warming as compared with unadjusted numbers.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/

The Arctic ice is the 16 most coverage in measuring History. The ice grew back with all this heat. LOL
Source please?
http://www.livescience.com/52185-arctic-sea-ice-4th-lowest.html

The sun has gone quiet and it will soon be obvious that we are headed down with another cooling period.
I guess we'll soon see who's right, you or the overwhelming majority of climatologists.

the lies just keep coming
Right? How do you do it?

but the good part, many experts are agreeing its not real.
I hate to break it to you, but you, Dawg, and Drumcollie are not experts.
 

Fast Eddy

Mayor
The increase can be seen using a variety of independent temperature data sets and proxy data. Again, adjustment by NOAA (to deal with the discontinuity of physical thermometers over the many decades) has had the effect of minimizing, not exaggerating, the warming as compared with unadjusted numbers.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/



Source please?
http://www.livescience.com/52185-arctic-sea-ice-4th-lowest.html



I guess we'll soon see who's right, you or the overwhelming majority of climatologists.



Right? How do you do it?



I hate to break it to you, but you, Dawg, and Drumcollie are not experts.

The lies by warmests are nothing short of astounding. Many people quote the NOAA and some of the professors, but if you study the data its blatantly bad. Time will tell very soon.
 

Fast Eddy

Mayor
The increase can be seen using a variety of independent temperature data sets and proxy data. Again, adjustment by NOAA (to deal with the discontinuity of physical thermometers over the many decades) has had the effect of minimizing, not exaggerating, the warming as compared with unadjusted numbers.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/



Source please?
http://www.livescience.com/52185-arctic-sea-ice-4th-lowest.html



I guess we'll soon see who's right, you or the overwhelming majority of climatologists.



Right? How do you do it?



I hate to break it to you, but you, Dawg, and Drumcollie are not experts.
Nope, its all BS and yes I have spent years studying the data and how its gathered, a lot of bad science used to prove something that isn't happening.
 

EatTheRich

President
Nope, its all BS and yes I have spent years studying the data and how its gathered, a lot of bad science used to prove something that isn't happening.
Have you "spent years studying the data" in the sense that you earned a Ph.D. in climatology or a related field, or in the sense that you read a lot of blog posts confirming the position to which you were already committed?
 

Stardust

Council Member
Jeb Bush:
"The climate is changing, whether men are doing it or not," Bush said, further calling for “policies of adaptation” to prep for its harmful consequences across the country.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/16/jeb-bush-climate-change_n_7596568.html

Lindsey Graham:
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), an environmentally friendly Republican, has promised to "address climate change, CO2 emissions in a business-friendly way.”
Ibid.

Chris Christie:
“When you have over 90 percent of the world’s scientists who have studied this stating that climate change is occurring and that humans play a contributing role it’s time to defer to the experts.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/12/where-the-2016-gop-contenders-stand-on-climate-change/

That's the just the first three I felt like Googling.

You don't have to lie to get your point across, even if your fellow lefties want you to. Try to be better than that...
I agree with you. Many republicans do believe our climate is changing. They just don't want to be crucified while trying to fix it! After all, I'd hardly say allowing China to produce 5x more fossil fuel by 2029, than they just slugged in from 1997 to 2003, is hardly taking a positive move in addressing the problem. And anyway, the Dem's Lucifer Gods of the universe, a.k.a. Rockefellers, control all of the fossil fuel use in the world! Anyway, I think Rockefeller's Monsanto gm meat production is on the way out too. Look's like God destroyed them. Only a matter of time before small scale farming and ranching takes hold around the world. God's world, God's plan! Not there's.
 

EatTheRich

President
High and Mighty Low Life

Americans should never give any credibility to anything preached by these spoiled bossy 60s brats. They are aristocratic snobs and should be deported back to the crumbling castles of Europe where they belong. They are conceited for no other reason than that their Daddies got rich. Their theories are childish, self-indulgent, and ignorant. They are the Nobility With No Ability.
Scientists are an aristocracy of sorts, but their most potent power comes not from their pedigrees, their money, nor even their degrees, but from their knowledge of how the world works. The advancement and popular dissemination of science means the advance of technology, the advance of democracy, and the retreat of ignorance.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
The increase can be seen using a variety of independent temperature data sets and proxy data. Again, adjustment by NOAA (to deal with the discontinuity of physical thermometers over the many decades) has had the effect of minimizing, not exaggerating, the warming as compared with unadjusted numbers.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/



Source please?
http://www.livescience.com/52185-arctic-sea-ice-4th-lowest.html



I guess we'll soon see who's right, you or the overwhelming majority of climatologists.



Right? How do you do it?



I hate to break it to you, but you, Dawg, and Drumcollie are not experts.
These are:

http://realclimatescience.com/2017/01/earth-cooling-at-the-fastest-rate-on-record/
 
The increase can be seen using a variety of independent temperature data sets and proxy data. Again, adjustment by NOAA (to deal with the discontinuity of physical thermometers over the many decades) has had the effect of minimizing, not exaggerating, the warming as compared with unadjusted numbers.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/



Source please?
http://www.livescience.com/52185-arctic-sea-ice-4th-lowest.html



I guess we'll soon see who's right, you or the overwhelming majority of climatologists.



Right? How do you do it?



I hate to break it to you, but you, Dawg, and Drumcollie are not experts.
Lenin's Lemmings

What I notice is your undereducated clique's linguistic tricks. Instead of using data as plural, which would be done by those who actually have the level of education the minor-league climatologists claim to have, the master manipulators came up with "dataset" to relieve their dumb followers from a having to learn intelligent English usage.
 
Scientists are an aristocracy of sorts, but their most potent power comes not from their pedigrees, their money, nor even their degrees, but from their knowledge of how the world works. The advancement and popular dissemination of science means the advance of technology, the advance of democracy, and the retreat of ignorance.
Stolen Valor

Your pompous Eco-Eunuchs are taking advantage of the reputation of productive scientists, who aren't like them at all. The Warmalarmists are so jealous of anyone who has contributed to material advancement that they become fixated on this comforting answer to their own inferiority, which is that those who build actually destroy. They have as little to do with science's purpose as astrologers have to do with astronomy.
 

Corruptbuddha

Governor
LOL...Climate Change.

Bitching about AGW is like bitching about the extinction of the dinosaurs. Nothing can be done about it.

Nothing.

The die is cast.
 

EatTheRich

President
Stolen Valor

Your pompous Eco-Eunuchs are taking advantage of the reputation of productive scientists, who aren't like them at all. The Warmalarmists are so jealous of anyone who has contributed to material advancement that they become fixated on this comforting answer to their own inferiority, which is that those who build actually destroy. They have as little to do with science's purpose as astrologers have to do with astronomy.
Yet they use the same methods as all other scientists, and their very robust theory has abundant empirical confirmation - - which is why there is essentially no disagreement from scientists (in any field) themselves, only from laypeople who have been bombarded with anti-science propaganda.
 

EatTheRich

President
LOL...Climate Change.

Bitching about AGW is like bitching about the extinction of the dinosaurs. Nothing can be done about it.

Nothing.

The die is cast.
Some climate change is certainly unavoidable, which means not that we should do nothing but that we should be prepared to adapt. But meanwhile the extent and pace of climate change depends greatly on how much fossil fuel combustion continues.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
The dishonesty of this source is blatant. For example, they claim that Mann's comments about a "slowdown" in global warming (now over) contradicts the scientists claiming there was no pause. But the "slowdown" obviously means that the warming continued, but at a slower pace.
Check Maunder Minimum and get back with me
 
Top