Let's talk about "Mostly Peaceful"...

[Mr. Friscus]

It's the most common buzzword by the media to avoid having to address violence. Well... it turns out, even the most violent of times in our nation and world, the world itself was "mostly peaceful".

I mean, in WW2, it was only Europe and Russia where the war was.. the rest of the world wasn't at some mainstream war, so our planet was "mostly peaceful". Think that accurately portrays what was going on at the time? No, I don't either.

Let's apply it to other things. Both the North and South owned Slaves during the civil war, but as far as the South was concerned, very few southerners owned slaves. So, the Confederacy, as well as the Union, was "mostly non-slave owners"... right CNN?

At the same time, no such label was allowed to those who protested shutdowns. They were slandered as violent takeovers of federal buildings... despite the fact that no violence occurred and no laws were ever broken. Where was not only "mostly peaceful".. but the term "peaceful" itself, back then???

It's a scam of a phrase. Every time you hear it, it's political activism, not journalism. Report the news, stop covering for those who you vote for.

 

[EatTheRich]

It's the most common buzzword by the media to avoid having to address violence. Well... it turns out, even the most violent of times in our nation and world, the world itself was "mostly peaceful".

I mean, in WW2, it was only Europe and Russia where the war was.. the rest of the world wasn't at some mainstream war, so our planet was "mostly peaceful". Think that accurately portrays what was going on at the time? No, I don't either.

Let's apply it to other things. Both the North and South owned Slaves during the civil war, but as far as the South was concerned, very few southerners owned slaves. So, the Confederacy, as well as the Union, was "mostly non-slave owners"... right CNN?

At the same time, no such label was allowed to those who protested shutdowns. They were slandered as violent takeovers of federal buildings... despite the fact that no violence occurred and no laws were ever broken. Where was not only "mostly peaceful".. but the term "peaceful" itself, back then???

It's a scam of a phrase. Every time you hear it, it's political activism, not journalism. Report the news, stop covering for those who you vote for.

32% of white families owned slaves.

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

WWII involved 30 (86%) of the world’s 35 countries.

Atlas of World War II - Wikimedia Commons

commons.m.wikimedia.org

There have been 14,000 arrests (a majority of them for graffiti) among the 26 million protesters (0.05%).

Apples and red herrings.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

32% of white families owned slaves.

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

WWII involved 30 (86%) of the world’s 35 countries.

Atlas of World War II - Wikimedia Commons

commons.m.wikimedia.org

There have been 14,000 arrests (a majority of them for graffiti) among the 26 million protesters (0.05%).

Apples and red herrings.

Wow you are off.
1. 5% of people owned slaves, 15-20% of “families” (whatever that technically means) owned slaves. Regardless, by these metrics, and per CNN/MSM standards, the south was mostly non slave-owning.

2. so a country is a country is a country now? Russia = Montenegro? How silly, and given the defense you’re trying to muster, dishonest.

Most of the world, and the people in it, was not involved in WW2. The earth, by CNN standards, was “mostly peaceful”

of course, such things kill how intense the war was, but that’s precisely what the phrase is meant to do. It’s really not that bad, nothing to see here. Stay focused on the radical message us “journalists” are preaching.

it’s so obvious

 

[Dawg]

"mostly peaceful"-----adversaries

MSN

The difference is uses the word.

 

[RickWA]

It's the most common buzzword by the media to avoid having to address violence. Well... it turns out, even the most violent of times in our nation and world, the world itself was "mostly peaceful".

I mean, in WW2, it was only Europe and Russia where the war was.. the rest of the world wasn't at some mainstream war, so our planet was "mostly peaceful". Think that accurately portrays what was going on at the time? No, I don't either.

Let's apply it to other things. Both the North and South owned Slaves during the civil war, but as far as the South was concerned, very few southerners owned slaves. So, the Confederacy, as well as the Union, was "mostly non-slave owners"... right CNN?

At the same time, no such label was allowed to those who protested shutdowns. They were slandered as violent takeovers of federal buildings... despite the fact that no violence occurred and no laws were ever broken. Where was not only "mostly peaceful".. but the term "peaceful" itself, back then???

It's a scam of a phrase. Every time you hear it, it's political activism, not journalism. Report the news, stop covering for those who you vote for.

Ted Bundy was “mostly peaceful”. The vast majority of folks he came across he did not butcher. In fact, he didn’t even utter a cross word to them.

 

[Dawg]

32% of white families owned slaves.

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

I demand my reparations, how about you?

White slaves, Black slave owners in America

Blacks owned White slaves in America

www.ironbarkresources.com

of course by mostly peaceful means

 

[EatTheRich]

Wow you are off.
1. 5% of people owned slaves, 15-20% of “families” (whatever that technically means) owned slaves. Regardless, by these metrics, and per CNN/MSM standards, the south was mostly non slave-owning.

2. so a country is a country is a country now? Russia = Montenegro? How silly, and given the defense you’re trying to muster, dishonest.

Most of the world, and the people in it, was not involved in WW2. The earth, by CNN standards, was “mostly peaceful”

of course, such things kill how intense the war was, but that’s precisely what the phrase is meant to do. It’s really not that bad, nothing to see here. Stay focused on the radical message us “journalists” are preaching.

it’s so obvious

1. Do you have a source that contradicts the one I provided?
2. The most populous countries in the world (and their colonies, which covered almost the entire map) were involved. Did you see the map of belligerents vs. neutral countries in the link I posted?

I notice you didn’t attempt to refute the point that 99.95% of protesters were not even accused of graffiti, much less violence.

 

[EatTheRich]

You seem to have been duped by this white-supremacist propaganda ... indentured servants are not slaves, and the link I posted directly contradicts the headline claim.