New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Liberal Logic 101

But we are not so stupid to believe that either of the wordings on those two pictures are correct.
 
Uh huh.... liberals have never called Sarah Palin a
censored.gif
censored.gif
censored.gif
censored.gif
and worse. And what's-her-name was talking about a "friend" (wink wink, nudge nudge).

But we are not so stupid to believe that either of the wordings on those two pictures are correct.
 
Ummm, she was talking about a friend of hers and conservatives hate facts.

You guys would be funny if you dealt in reality

Please don't attempt to be funny unless you're being really stupid on purpose k?

Thx
 
Hee hee hee.... of course, it's not her, it's her "friend".

ROFLMAO!!!

Ummm, she was talking about a friend of hers and conservatives hate facts.

You guys would be funny if you dealt in reality

Please don't attempt to be funny unless you're being really stupid on purpose k?

Thx
 
--Not a direct quote, but, pretty close to what numerous Leftists have told me: "Sarah Palin injected her daughters into the campaign."

--Obama did the same, yesterday (if not before...). And yet...I have this funny feeling, that the Left will have a group cunniption fit when, not if, some from our side of the aisle start making crude comments.



--Bill Maher's statements about Sarah Palin, and Michelle Bachman, are "acceptable," because: he's a commedian, it is HBO, he is not the "Godhead" of the Democrat party, as Rush is for the GOP, he was 'punished,' (but, Rush is NOT being 'punished, even though in the next post, Liberals will comment on him losing advertisers..), etc.

--Ed Schultz apology to Laura Ingram was "sincere" (Because, LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Ingram accepted it.--Of course, that should tell us more about Ingram, when compared to Fluke...)

--Rush Limbaugh's apology to Fluke was NOT "sincere." (Because LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Fluke did not accept it.--SEE my comments about Ingram, above.) OF course, when TELLING us (again. and again. and again and again...) that "Rush is the Godhead of the GOP," many on the Left will put forth the "VERY SINCERE" apologies (Again, because THEY SAID SO!) from some Republican Congressmen to Rush...

I have come to the conclusion that when it comes to Fairness, Civility, Truth, etc., the vast majority of Liberals simply "make it up as they go..."(Of course, they seem to ALWAYS keep the right to go back and change and alter their lofty standards, depending on what suits them at any given time....)
 
Yep Doc, you've summed it up quite well. Liberals are INSANE.

--Not a direct quote, but, pretty close to what numerous Leftists have told me: "Sarah Palin injected her daughters into the campaign."

--Obama did the same, yesterday (if not before...). And yet...I have this funny feeling, that the Left will have a group cunniption fit when, not if, some from our side of the aisle start making crude comments.



--Bill Maher's statements about Sarah Palin, and Michelle Bachman, are "acceptable," because: he's a commedian, it is HBO, he is not the "Godhead" of the Democrat party, as Rush is for the GOP, he was 'punished,' (but, Rush is NOT being 'punished, even though in the next post, Liberals will comment on him losing advertisers..), etc.

--Ed Schultz apology to Laura Ingram was "sincere" (Because, LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Ingram accepted it.--Of course, that should tell us more about Ingram, when compared to Fluke...)

--Rush Limbaugh's apology to Fluke was NOT "sincere." (Because LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Fluke did not accept it.--SEE my comments about Ingram, above.) OF course, when TELLING us (again. and again. and again and again...) that "Rush is the Godhead of the GOP," many on the Left will put forth the "VERY SINCERE" apologies (Again, because THEY SAID SO!) from some Republican Congressmen to Rush...

I have come to the conclusion that when it comes to Fairness, Civility, Truth, etc., the vast majority of Liberals simply "make it up as they go..."(Of course, they seem to ALWAYS keep the right to go back and change and alter their lofty standards, depending on what suits them at any given time....)
 
The cacophony inside the redkookian echo-chamber around this one, is becoming deafening.

And all the while...the Fox/GOP's polling among women is going down, down, down....

The Fox/GOP TRIED all those years, to shout at black folks as to how stupid they were for voting Democratic. They tried it with the Latinos, and young voters, and Jews. All the while, they shouted that eventually these demographics would figure it out and decide that the Fox/GOP was the place for them. Alas...that hasn't worked out for them. And now....they seem to be thinking it'll finally work with the female electorate.
 
--Not a direct quote, but, pretty close to what numerous Leftists have told me: "Sarah Palin injected her daughters into the campaign."

--Obama did the same, yesterday (if not before...). And yet...I have this funny feeling, that the Left will have a group cunniption fit when, not if, some from our side of the aisle start making crude comments.



--Bill Maher's statements about Sarah Palin, and Michelle Bachman, are "acceptable," because: he's a commedian, it is HBO, he is not the "Godhead" of the Democrat party, as Rush is for the GOP, he was 'punished,' (but, Rush is NOT being 'punished, even though in the next post, Liberals will comment on him losing advertisers..), etc.

--Ed Schultz apology to Laura Ingram was "sincere" (Because, LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Ingram accepted it.--Of course, that should tell us more about Ingram, when compared to Fluke...)

--Rush Limbaugh's apology to Fluke was NOT "sincere." (Because LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Fluke did not accept it.--SEE my comments about Ingram, above.) OF course, when TELLING us (again. and again. and again and again...) that "Rush is the Godhead of the GOP," many on the Left will put forth the "VERY SINCERE" apologies (Again, because THEY SAID SO!) from some Republican Congressmen to Rush...

I have come to the conclusion that when it comes to Fairness, Civility, Truth, etc., the vast majority of Liberals simply "make it up as they go..."(Of course, they seem to ALWAYS keep the right to go back and change and alter their lofty standards, depending on what suits them at any given time....)

Hey, Doc, has Maher or Shultz for three days talked about sexual behavior of Palin and Inghram. Or did they use the "S" or "C " word as a one time thrown political insult as when on crossfire I will call Stan his real name.
Did they for three days in a row were discussing those women' sex life and the desire to watch the tapes.?
Maher and Shultz made a politically insult not sexual.
Rush did totally opposite.
You do not see the difference , that is very sad.
And that Rush is de--facto king of GOP and nobody dares to go against him , that is another point.
 
Hey, Doc, has Maher or Shultz for three days talked about sexual behavior of Palin and Inghram. Or did they use the "S" or "C " word as a one time thrown political insult as when on crossfire I will call Stan his real name.

--Yes, yes, that falls under the "make it up as they go along" part of my post. Calling a woman a "Cvnt" is calling a woman a "Cvnt." The rest of your spin, is simply that: SPIN, in order to justify the use of such insults from YOUR side, while maintaining that it is WRONG for those from the other side to recipocate. (THAT, my friend, is the definition of "Hypocrisy." No, I do note expect you to admit as much. THAT would rewuire, HONESTY...)

Did they for three days in a row were discussing those women' sex life and the desire to watch the tapes.?

--I dunno. I have not added up all of the minutes of all the insluts, directed at Palin, Palin's daughters, Palin's infant son with down's syndrome, the Bush Twins, Laura Ingram, Michelle Bachman, Michelle Malkin, and Ann Coulter. Not going to, either. They said what they said. See above for my comments on that...

Maher and Shultz made a politically insult not sexual.

--Calling a woman a "Cvnt" is a "political," insult, NOT a "sexual" insult??? Riiiiigght, got that. (Dude, that is simply a lie. Or ignorance. I can't say...)

Rush did totally opposite.

--??? So, I guess, today, the word "slvt" IS (speaking of definitions...) a "sexual insult," while, "cvnt" is a "political insult." (ARE YOU SERIOUS????????)

You do not see the difference , that is very sad.

--Yes, I do see the difference. You feel it acceptable to level crude insults at Conservative women, but, NOT acceptable to do the same to Liberal women. (Again, that IS--damn, that word again!!!--the literal definition of "HYPOCRISY...")

And that Rush is de--facto king of GOP and nobody dares to go against him , that is another point.

--That is simply a lie.
 
Hey, Doc, has Maher or Shultz for three days talked about sexual behavior of Palin and Inghram. Or did they use the "S" or "C " word as a one time thrown political insult as when on crossfire I will call Stan his real name.

--Yes, yes, that falls under the "make it up as they go along" part of my post. Calling a woman a "Cvnt" is calling a woman a "Cvnt." The rest of your spin, is simply that: SPIN, in order to justify the use of such insults from YOUR side, while maintaining that it is WRONG for those from the other side to recipocate. (THAT, my friend, is the definition of "Hypocrisy." No, I do note expect you to admit as much. THAT would rewuire, HONESTY...)

Did they for three days in a row were discussing those women' sex life and the desire to watch the tapes.?

--I dunno. I have not added up all of the minutes of all the insluts, directed at Palin, Palin's daughters, Palin's infant son with down's syndrome, the Bush Twins, Laura Ingram, Michelle Bachman, Michelle Malkin, and Ann Coulter. Not going to, either. They said what they said. See above for my comments on that...

Maher and Shultz made a politically insult not sexual.

--Calling a woman a "Cvnt" is a "political," insult, NOT a "sexual" insult??? Riiiiigght, got that. (Dude, that is simply a lie. Or ignorance. I can't say...)

Rush did totally opposite.

--??? So, I guess, today, the word "slvt" IS (speaking of definitions...) a "sexual insult," while, "cvnt" is a "political insult." (ARE YOU SERIOUS????????)

You do not see the difference , that is very sad.

--Yes, I do see the difference. You feel it acceptable to level crude insults at Conservative women, but, NOT acceptable to do the same to Liberal women. (Again, that IS--damn, that word again!!!--the literal definition of "HYPOCRISY...")

And that Rush is de--facto king of GOP and nobody dares to go against him , that is another point.

--That is simply a lie.

just as I thought. you don't get it.
And nobody is justifying anything, but again, there is a difference of one time use of a certain word as a tool in political conversation, just like I call somebody swine , but he/she is not really a swine. And methodical for days talk about unknown woman's sexual life in disparaging way.
Let me repeat again, talking about somebody's sexual life for days in disparaging insulting way based on lies.
Now go ahead and compare it with my use of word swine to nonswine, or s-ut to nonsl0t
 
Amazing, isn't it! Also amazing how the leftists here all fake outrage at Rush, when Maher, Shultz and other left-wing aholes in the media have said as bad or WORSE about non-leftie women. Of course, the outrage is fabricated and phony....just as is everything lefties bleat.....lol.

Yep, it just boggles the (rational) mind...

View attachment 546
 
No, Yuri, I do NOT "get it."

Might be, because I am not a rank hypocrit.
 
Bingo, Doc! Spot ON!

--Not a direct quote, but, pretty close to what numerous Leftists have told me: "Sarah Palin injected her daughters into the campaign."

--Obama did the same, yesterday (if not before...). And yet...I have this funny feeling, that the Left will have a group cunniption fit when, not if, some from our side of the aisle start making crude comments.



--Bill Maher's statements about Sarah Palin, and Michelle Bachman, are "acceptable," because: he's a commedian, it is HBO, he is not the "Godhead" of the Democrat party, as Rush is for the GOP, he was 'punished,' (but, Rush is NOT being 'punished, even though in the next post, Liberals will comment on him losing advertisers..), etc.

--Ed Schultz apology to Laura Ingram was "sincere" (Because, LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Ingram accepted it.--Of course, that should tell us more about Ingram, when compared to Fluke...)

--Rush Limbaugh's apology to Fluke was NOT "sincere." (Because LIBERALS TELL us so, and, because Fluke did not accept it.--SEE my comments about Ingram, above.) OF course, when TELLING us (again. and again. and again and again...) that "Rush is the Godhead of the GOP," many on the Left will put forth the "VERY SINCERE" apologies (Again, because THEY SAID SO!) from some Republican Congressmen to Rush...

I have come to the conclusion that when it comes to Fairness, Civility, Truth, etc., the vast majority of Liberals simply "make it up as they go..."(Of course, they seem to ALWAYS keep the right to go back and change and alter their lofty standards, depending on what suits them at any given time....)
 
And what is her "friend's" excuse for not getting her FREE birth control pills from Planned Parenthood???

Ummm, she was talking about a friend of hers and conservatives hate facts.

You guys would be funny if you dealt in reality

Please don't attempt to be funny unless you're being really stupid on purpose k?

Thx
 
No, Yuri, I do NOT "get it."

Might be, because I am not a rank hypocrit.

One more time, Doc. See if you can concentrate.
It isn’t about the names.Nobody said Maher did good calling Palin the "c" word"
It’s about the creepy, voyeuristic imagination that went into “so much sex it’s amazing she can walk,” and the demand for videotapes, coupled with the fact that (a)she’s a private citizen, not a public figure, and (b)she’s less than half his age. Men his age have daughters her age. Decent men his age don’t fantasize, in public , at great length and in specific detail, about the sex lives of their daughters’ contemporaries.
 
Here is the way you should look at this situation...the woman on the left is not a
censored.gif
censored.gif
censored.gif
censored.gif
and the woman on the right slept with Glenn Rice just for the hell of it.
 
I do not have to "concentrate" in order to see your hypocrisy in this matter.
 
Yurin: But... but... but Bill Maher wasn't standing on his left leg facing north on a Tuesday morning in Spring during a full moon when he attacked Sarah Palin- so it's DIFFERENT I tell ya!

lmao@liberaldesperation
I normally engage in decent conversations with normal not lying and having IQ at least over zero people on this board.
With you i feel more appropriate venue will be Crossfire, cause I do not consider you decent not lying intelligent person
 
Back
Top