New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Liberalism Is A DISEASE...........really

Dawg said:
'O' adored Chavez.........just gave Ukraine a $BILLION...........why?
Click to expand...

Because The Ukraine is worth a lot more than 10 billion ( Newland already gave them 9) - the money goes into 'pockets' - the Western ( US ) Banks then owns The Ukraine through the debt ' that went into pockets' and so its soul -

The 'pockets' won't even get the money anyway - promises promises - we are all in debt for promises - paying interest on unpaid promises.
 
Last edited:
ABSOLUTELY [Unwelcome language removed] HILARIOUS THAT THOUSANDS OF U.S. CITIZENS HAD THEIR MIC SHUT OFF BY THIS BITCH AND HER FRIENDS AT THE IRS FOR WASSERMAN TO GET [Unwelcome language removed] INDIGNANT. DROP DEAD BEYOTCH. and interviewer too.
 
Arkady said:
Issa doesn't want his witch hunts called into question on TV. He's like McCarthy, only without brave Republicans like Margaret Chase Smith around to call him out for his misconduct. The era of some Republicans having souls is fast receding into history and soon will seem like nothing but a fairy tale.
Click to expand...
Committees have to close sometime. People get to go home without having to listen to idiots who can mouth off on the record in the hallway with reporters.
 
resident_evil said:
Committees have to close sometime. People get to go home without having to listen to idiots who can mouth off on the record in the hallway with reporters.
Click to expand...
Issa is trying to generate a political scandal where he knows none exists, by strategically leaking out-of-context information and blocking information that would counter the narrative he wants to construct. Letting the ranking Democrat speak, even briefly, is a terrible threat to him, since he knows he's been wasting millions of our tax dollars on nothing for months. In this case, he didn't want the Dem explaining on the official record that the witness had offered to speak through her attorney and Issa had turned her down.
 
Arkady said:
Issa is trying to generate a political scandal where he knows none exists, by strategically leaking out-of-context information and blocking information that would counter the narrative he wants to construct. Letting the ranking Democrat speak, even briefly, is a terrible threat to him, since he knows he's been wasting millions of our tax dollars on nothing for months. In this case, he didn't want the Dem explaining on the official record that the witness had offered to speak through her attorney and Issa had turned her down.
Click to expand...
Issa might be the wrong man for the job. Doesn't mean 501c applicants weren't blatantly and illegally sodomized by liberals.
 
resident_evil said:
Issa might be the wrong man for the job. Doesn't mean 501c applicants weren't blatantly and illegally sodomized by liberals.
Click to expand...
The IRS was flooded with applicants in the wake of Citizens United (even at a time when government austerity prevents staffing up to meet that heightened demand). So, how do they best use that short staff to weed out as many ineligible applicants as they can? The solution hit on by one of the people responsible (who identifies himself as a conservative Republican) was giving extra attention to applicant groups whose names contained certain key words that sounded like likely names for partisan Republican or Democratic outfits -- things like Tea Party, Blue, Progressive, and Occupy. In the process, they only took the 501c status away from one group -- a liberal group.

That's not the narrative Issa has tried to create with his carefully tailored leaks, which only shared the half of the information about targeting conservative groups, not the half about targeting liberal ones. And he tried to block the release of the full transcript, which revealed that the person responsible said the Obama administration had no involvement.

He's a scumbag. He tried to invent a scandal for the administration out of whole cloth, through selective leaking and censorship. He has made himself a national laughingstock, and ought to be impeached for his clearly corrupt abuse of power. As for whether the IRS was being lazy or inappropriate with those keyword filters, and whether the burden on some legitimate applicants was too great, those are good questions. But to get at those, the investigation would have to have been focused honestly and openly on creating a clear picture of what actually happened, rather than creating a false picture of a partisan operation that never happened. Issa wanted to convince dumb people that this was about liberals trying to gain an advantage, facts be damned.
 
Queen Titania said:
Because The Ukraine is worth a lot more than 10 billion ( Newland already gave them 9) - the money goes into 'pockets' - the Western ( US ) Banks then owns The Ukraine through the debt ' that went into pockets' and so its soul -

The 'pockets' won't even get the money anyway - promises promises - we are all in debt for promises - paying interest on unpaid promises.
Click to expand...

and CHINA owes USA now.........down East.........China has bought ALL but two hog farms.......my bud.refuses to sell to the Chinks........but he will have toooooooo.

these gawd damn liberals going to soon learn a HARD lesson...........I almostb like it.....they going to starve to death...........they nthink the food is raised/growning in the back of the grociery story...........I need spell check......they going to die with their bellies rubbing what they never had..a backbone.......
 
Arkady said:
The IRS was flooded with applicants in the wake of Citizens United (even at a time when government austerity prevents staffing up to meet that heightened demand). So, how do they best use that short staff to weed out as many ineligible applicants as they can? The solution hit on by one of the people responsible (who identifies himself as a conservative Republican) was giving extra attention to applicant groups whose names contained certain key words that sounded like likely names for partisan Republican or Democratic outfits -- things like Tea Party, Blue, Progressive, and Occupy. In the process, they only took the 501c status away from one group -- a liberal group.

That's not the narrative Issa has tried to create with his carefully tailored leaks, which only shared the half of the information about targeting conservative groups, not the half about targeting liberal ones. And he tried to block the release of the full transcript, which revealed that the person responsible said the Obama administration had no involvement.

He's a scumbag. He tried to invent a scandal for the administration out of whole cloth, through selective leaking and censorship. He has made himself a national laughingstock, and ought to be impeached for his clearly corrupt abuse of power. As for whether the IRS was being lazy or inappropriate with those keyword filters, and whether the burden on some legitimate applicants was too great, those are good questions. But to get at those, the investigation would have to have been focused honestly and openly on creating a clear picture of what actually happened, rather than creating a false picture of a partisan operation that never happened. Issa wanted to convince dumb people that this was about liberals trying to gain an advantage, facts be damned.
Click to expand...
Bullshit trying to hide behind incompetence. WE have 501c conservatives applicants and their IRS letter headed documentation. Many of them telling the same story. If there was one liberal group or two doesn't matter.

The IRS must go as it is today. To secure our republic we need the same flat tax for everyone.
 
resident_evil said:
Bullshit trying to hide behind incompetence. WE have 501c conservatives applicants and their IRS letter headed documentation. Many of them telling the same story. If there was one liberal group or two doesn't matter.

The IRS must go as it is today. To secure our republic we need the same flat tax for everyone.
Click to expand...
you aint gonna get it
 
Dawg said:
and CHINA owes USA now.........down East.........China has bought ALL but two hog farms.......my bud.refuses to sell to the Chinks........but he will have toooooooo.

these gawd damn liberals going to soon learn a HARD lesson...........I almostb like it.....they going to starve to death...........they nthink the food is raised/growning in the back of the grociery story...........I need spell check......they going to die with their bellies rubbing what they never had..a backbone.......
Click to expand...
Oh, blow it out your ass, Dilly Dally. The only thing you got right was that you can't spell.

BTW, hog sloppers aren't farmers. They just feed insatiable pigs to see how fat they can get them. They're Republicans.
 
Arkady said:
The IRS was flooded with applicants in the wake of Citizens United (even at a time when government austerity prevents staffing up to meet that heightened demand). So, how do they best use that short staff to weed out as many ineligible applicants as they can? The solution hit on by one of the people responsible (who identifies himself as a conservative Republican) was giving extra attention to applicant groups whose names contained certain key words that sounded like likely names for partisan Republican or Democratic outfits -- things like Tea Party, Blue, Progressive, and Occupy. In the process, they only took the 501c status away from one group -- a liberal group.

That's not the narrative Issa has tried to create with his carefully tailored leaks, which only shared the half of the information about targeting conservative groups, not the half about targeting liberal ones. And he tried to block the release of the full transcript, which revealed that the person responsible said the Obama administration had no involvement.

He's a scumbag. He tried to invent a scandal for the administration out of whole cloth, through selective leaking and censorship. He has made himself a national laughingstock, and ought to be impeached for his clearly corrupt abuse of power. As for whether the IRS was being lazy or inappropriate with those keyword filters, and whether the burden on some legitimate applicants was too great, those are good questions. But to get at those, the investigation would have to have been focused honestly and openly on creating a clear picture of what actually happened, rather than creating a false picture of a partisan operation that never happened. Issa wanted to convince dumb people that this was about liberals trying to gain an advantage, facts be damned.
Click to expand...
Issa wanted to convince dumb people that this was about liberals

Well, it obviously worked again. How much did it cost us this time? Starr was $60 million, Cruz was $28 billion....dumb people sure are expensive to fool. But the dream goes on to find themselves a Watergate, an Iran Contra, a Scooter Libby, a WMD under Bush's desk....Nixon must be avenged! Hang Bert Lance! All glory to Shurriff Joe and the birther posse! Quit picking on Joe the Plumber!

But Michelle spent $100 on a pair of shoes and Obama golfs too much!

Clowns.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dawg said:
and CHINA owes USA now.........down East.........China has bought ALL but two hog farms.......my bud.refuses to sell to the Chinks........but he will have toooooooo.

these gawd damn liberals going to soon learn a HARD lesson...........I almostb like it.....they going to starve to death...........they nthink the food is raised/growning in the back of the grociery story...........I need spell check......they going to die with their bellies rubbing what they never had..a backbone.......
Click to expand...

I know it is all a worry Dawg :) Nobody owns themselves we are all owned by each other -crazy - My mortgage, over the years, has been bought and sold so many times it is enough to make a person dizzy. Now actually for the first time it is owned by an English company - well 59% English anyway - I dunno -

I can't spell either xxx

I don't use spell check though it drives me crazy and no one learns from a 'machine' correcting them - don't worry about it -
 
Last edited:
resident_evil said:
ABSOLUTELY [Unwelcome language removed] HILARIOUS THAT THOUSANDS OF U.S. CITIZENS HAD THEIR MIC SHUT OFF BY THIS BITCH AND HER FRIENDS AT THE IRS FOR WASSERMAN TO GET [Unwelcome language removed] INDIGNANT. DROP DEAD BEYOTCH. and interviewer too.
Click to expand...

What were you saying about sick? Evil must be a liberal.....because this is sick
 
resident_evil said:
Bullshit trying to hide behind incompetence. WE have 501c conservatives applicants and their IRS letter headed documentation. Many of them telling the same story. If there was one liberal group or two doesn't matter.

The IRS must go as it is today. To secure our republic we need the same flat tax for everyone.
Click to expand...
I laid the facts out as they happened. The point here is that Issa deliberately tried to create a false narrative by asking for a report only detailing the targeting of conservative groups, so as to exclude the targeting of liberal groups that was going on through the exact same protocol. The Fox News crowd ate it up.

As for the flat tax concept, have you ever run the numbers? In order to have a flat tax in lieu of the current income tax (keeping the current payroll taxes in place), without boosting deficits hugely, you'd need one set at a rate of around 7.2%.... or, if you want one that would replace the income and payroll taxes, it would need to be about 17.4%. That would constitute a big tax hike on the lowest 80% of American earners.

For example, let's say you're middle class (somewhere between the 40th and 60th of all earners). That probably means you pay an effective total individual tax rate of 11.1% (that was the average in 2009 for all households in that quintile). Raising that to 17.4% means your tax bill would rise by 56.8%. So, if you paid Uncle Sam $5700 last year, next year, under the flat tax, you'd pay him over $8900. That's what a flat tax would mean to the middle class.

Of course what a flat tax would mean to the super-rich is a gigantic tax cut, which is why it's something that people like Steve Forbes drool over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top