Lindsey Graham back on Trump bandwagon: “This is a lynching, in every sense!”

[Bugsy McGurk]

Got that sports fans?

The guy who prosecuted the impeachment case against Bill Clinton for trying to conceal blowjobs calls the impeachment against Trump “a lynching in every sense.”

Trying to cover up blowjobs? Impeachable.

Extorting a desperate foreign country seeking to fend off Russia into announcing bogus investigations of political opponents for crass personal purposes? Just fine. Impeachment proceedings based upon that is a “lynching in every sense.”

Deplorable!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4062897002

 

[Dino]

Got that sports fans?

The guy who prosecuted the impeachment case against Bill Clinton for trying to conceal blowjobs calls the impeachment against Trump “a lynching in every sense.”

Trying to cover up blowjobs? Impeachable.

Extorting a desperate foreign country seeking to fend off Russia into announcing bogus investigations of political opponents for crass personal purposes? Just fine. Impeachment proceedings based upon that is a “lynching in every sense.”

Deplorable!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4062897002

Clinton: guilty of contempt of court charge.

By Roberto Suro and Joan Biskupic
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, April 13, 1999; Page A1

A federal judge yesterday held President Clinton in contempt of court for giving "intentionally false" testimony about his relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky in the Paula Jones lawsuit, marking the first time that a sitting president has been sanctioned for disobeying a court order.

In a biting, 32-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of Arkansas said Clinton gave "false, misleading and evasive answers that were designed to obstruct the judicial process" in Jones's sexual harassment lawsuit. She specifically cited Clinton's assertions that he was never alone with Lewinsky and that he did not have a sexual relationship with the former White House intern.

Clinton: Guilty in civil case brought by Paula Jones.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/jul/30/clinton.usa

What's Trump done to even come close? A breach of etiquette?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Clinton: guilty of contempt of court charge.

By Roberto Suro and Joan Biskupic
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, April 13, 1999; Page A1

A federal judge yesterday held President Clinton in contempt of court for giving "intentionally false" testimony about his relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky in the Paula Jones lawsuit, marking the first time that a sitting president has been sanctioned for disobeying a court order.

In a biting, 32-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of Arkansas said Clinton gave "false, misleading and evasive answers that were designed to obstruct the judicial process" in Jones's sexual harassment lawsuit. She specifically cited Clinton's assertions that he was never alone with Lewinsky and that he did not have a sexual relationship with the former White House intern.

Clinton: Guilty in civil case brought by Paula Jones.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/jul/30/clinton.usa

What's Trump done to even come close? A breach of etiquette?

“Guilty” in civil cases? Deplorable.

Anyway, any comment on the topic?