Malaysian Air: Fox "News"....

[fairsheet]

This story is an excellent example of why I watch Fox News along with other sources, and why I take two newspapers.

Our teevees are awash with Malaysian Air conversation. The word "terrorism" is brought up in every case. And in every case (but Fox), it's noted that even as it can't be ruled out, there's no evidence to suggest that current events DO involve terrorism. Over at Fox, things are only slightly different. To a man and woman, they're suggesting that there's no evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism!

....a small but relevant distinction.

 

[NightSwimmer]

Did they turn their color code up to "Red"?

 

[Addy]

 

[Corruptbuddha]

This story is an excellent example of why I watch Fox News along with other sources, and why I take two newspapers.

Our teevees are awash with Malaysian Air conversation. The word "terrorism" is brought up in every case. And in every case (but Fox), it's noted that even as it can't be ruled out, there's no evidence to suggest that current events DO involve terrorism. Over at Fox, things are only slightly different. To a man and woman, they're suggesting that there's no evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism!

....a small but relevant distinction.

Is there any evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism?

 

[as seen on tv]

This story is an excellent example of why I watch Fox News along with other sources, and why I take two newspapers.

Our teevees are awash with Malaysian Air conversation. The word "terrorism" is brought up in every case. And in every case (but Fox), it's noted that even as it can't be ruled out, there's no evidence to suggest that current events DO involve terrorism. Over at Fox, things are only slightly different. To a man and woman, they're suggesting that there's no evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism!

....a small but relevant distinction.

can you name a "catastrophic mid flight disaster" (ie., not takeoff or landing) that WASNT caused by terrorism?

 

[crowfoot]

can you name a "catastrophic mid flight disaster" (ie., not takeoff or landing) that WASNT caused by terrorism?

yes

 

[fairsheet]

Is there any evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism?

Nope...and that's my point.

 

[Corruptbuddha]

Nope...and that's my point.

Your point is that Fox is right? It could be terrorism?

 

[fairsheet]

can you name a "catastrophic mid flight disaster" (ie., not takeoff or landing) that WASNT caused by terrorism?

Why is that relevant here?....since we don't know that a "catastrophic mid flight disaster" even occurred?

Nevertheless, I can - Air France 477.

 

[fairsheet]

Your point is that Fox is right? It could be terrorism?

I'm not sure where you're going with this angle, since EVERYONE has allowed that it could be terrorism.

 

[Corruptbuddha]

I'm not sure where you're going with this angle, since EVERYONE has allowed that it could be terrorism.

So your beef with Fox is that they tell the truth?

 

[GordonGecko]

Heard Hannity on his radio show yesterday....he was already blaming it on terrorism....by an IRANIAN....and once again pushing for Netanyahu and a massive bombing campaign.


I think if somebody catchs the sniffles in Colombo, Sri Lanka....Sean could find a way to spin it into "We gotta bomb Iran...they're engaging in germ warfare!!!"

 

[fairsheet]

So your beef with Fox is that they tell the truth?

Maybe you could indulge us all with a cut 'n paste of where I suggested that.

 

[Saladin2]

can you name a "catastrophic mid flight disaster" (ie., not takeoff or landing) that WASNT caused by terrorism?

There have been many...Most recently Air France disappeared suddenly....Mechanical failure...Combined with pilot error...Fox needs to gin up the paranoia and fear...The truth be damned

 

[Corruptbuddha]

Maybe you could indulge us all with a cut 'n paste of where I suggested that.

Happy to:

You said:
"To a man and woman, they're suggesting that there's no evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism!" - Meaning Fox is saying it could be terrorism.

I asked:
"Is there any evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism?" - Meaning is Fox lying.

You said:
"Nope...and that's my point." - Meaning Fox isn't lying.

There you go.

Since Fox isn't lying....you're mad they're telling the truth.

There you go.

 

[Saladin2]

Fox will continue to hype the incident as a terrorist act...and probably try to blame President Obama in some way...It is what they do...They SUCK

 

[zzigzzag]

So your beef with Fox is that they tell the truth?

Hahahahahahahaha! Yeah....that's it. How astute of you. Sheesh....

 

[NightSwimmer]

can you name a "catastrophic mid flight disaster" (ie., not takeoff or landing) that WASNT caused by terrorism?

I can.

 

[Saladin2]

Hahahahahahahaha! Yeah....that's it. How astute of you. Sheesh....

Most of the world doesn't even consider Fox a News organization..Most of their programing is Right Wing Bull$hit and very little News.

 

[NightSwimmer]

Is there any evidence to suggest that it's NOT terrorism?

Is there any evidence to suggest that God didn't do it?