New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Maybe it's because she is a commie...

Raoul_Luke

"Wait, it's all Marxism?" "Always has been."
On Thursday, for instance, in an admirable piece titled "When your opponent calls you a 'communist,' maybe don't propose price controls," Washington Post opinion columnist Catherine Rampell delivered a scathing critique of Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris's idiotic and authoritarian proposal for a "federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries."

The summary headline put it bluntly: "It’s hard to exaggerate how bad Kamala Harris’s price-gouging proposal is."

...

"It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food," Rampell wrote.

"Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk."

...

"At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat," the Post columnist wrote of Harris's proposal.


Even WaPo Can't Defend Kamala: You're Already Called Communist, 'Maybe Don't Propose Price Controls?' (msn.com)

So what will it lead to at worst? The (obvious) answer is, well, mass starvation. But hey, that's the kind of economic policies you get when you elect a marxist moron - oh, and don't forget to enjoy the decline...
 
On Thursday, for instance, in an admirable piece titled "When your opponent calls you a 'communist,' maybe don't propose price controls," Washington Post opinion columnist Catherine Rampell delivered a scathing critique of Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris's idiotic and authoritarian proposal for a "federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries."

The summary headline put it bluntly: "It’s hard to exaggerate how bad Kamala Harris’s price-gouging proposal is."

...

"It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food," Rampell wrote.

"Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk."

...

"At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat," the Post columnist wrote of Harris's proposal.


Even WaPo Can't Defend Kamala: You're Already Called Communist, 'Maybe Don't Propose Price Controls?' (msn.com)

So what will it lead to at worst? The (obvious) answer is, well, mass starvation. But hey, that's the kind of economic policies you get when you elect a marxist moron - oh, and don't forget to enjoy the decline...
I remember when you stupid old white men said the same about President Obama
 
On Thursday, for instance, in an admirable piece titled "When your opponent calls you a 'communist,' maybe don't propose price controls," Washington Post opinion columnist Catherine Rampell delivered a scathing critique of Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris's idiotic and authoritarian proposal for a "federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries."

The summary headline put it bluntly: "It’s hard to exaggerate how bad Kamala Harris’s price-gouging proposal is."

...

"It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food," Rampell wrote.

"Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk."

...

"At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat," the Post columnist wrote of Harris's proposal.


Even WaPo Can't Defend Kamala: You're Already Called Communist, 'Maybe Don't Propose Price Controls?' (msn.com)

So what will it lead to at worst? The (obvious) answer is, well, mass starvation. But hey, that's the kind of economic policies you get when you elect a marxist moron - oh, and don't forget to enjoy the decline...

That's as close to Hitler as we can get
 
On Thursday, for instance, in an admirable piece titled "When your opponent calls you a 'communist,' maybe don't propose price controls," Washington Post opinion columnist Catherine Rampell delivered a scathing critique of Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris's idiotic and authoritarian proposal for a "federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries."

The summary headline put it bluntly: "It’s hard to exaggerate how bad Kamala Harris’s price-gouging proposal is."

...

"It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food," Rampell wrote.

"Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk."

...

"At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat," the Post columnist wrote of Harris's proposal.


Even WaPo Can't Defend Kamala: You're Already Called Communist, 'Maybe Don't Propose Price Controls?' (msn.com)

So what will it lead to at worst? The (obvious) answer is, well, mass starvation. But hey, that's the kind of economic policies you get when you elect a marxist moron - oh, and don't forget to enjoy the decline...
What was once the extreme leftist commie pinko nutcase wing of the Democratic Party IS now its mainstream. Bernie Sanders and AOC are the new “center” of the DNC. Walz is a raging Marxists, as is Harris. They no longer needed to be placated symbolically here or there…they now drive policy.

DNCommunist Party.
COMMala Harris.
 
On Thursday, for instance, in an admirable piece titled "When your opponent calls you a 'communist,' maybe don't propose price controls," Washington Post opinion columnist Catherine Rampell delivered a scathing critique of Vice President and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris's idiotic and authoritarian proposal for a "federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries."

The summary headline put it bluntly: "It’s hard to exaggerate how bad Kamala Harris’s price-gouging proposal is."

...

"It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food," Rampell wrote.

"Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk."

...

"At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat," the Post columnist wrote of Harris's proposal.


Even WaPo Can't Defend Kamala: You're Already Called Communist, 'Maybe Don't Propose Price Controls?' (msn.com)

So what will it lead to at worst? The (obvious) answer is, well, mass starvation. But hey, that's the kind of economic policies you get when you elect a marxist moron - oh, and don't forget to enjoy the decline...
Feel free to point out where Marx advocated a regulated market system.
 
What was once the extreme leftist commie pinko nutcase wing of the Democratic Party IS now its mainstream. Bernie Sanders and AOC are the new “center” of the DNC. Walz is a raging Marxists, as is Harris. They no longer needed to be placated symbolically here or there…they now drive policy.

DNCommunist Party.
COMMala Harris.
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez would have been considered moderate voices in Truman's time. Today they are considered "far left" because the Democratic Party (not to mention the Republican Party) have moved so far to the right. Now it has taken the smallest steps back to the left with a proposal that (as pointed out in post 3) could have come from the most rock-ribbed of right-wingers.
Is your point that only communism can produce general prosperity?
 
You stupid old white men just run your mouth all day about "Kamala"...She is a force that can't be stopped...Now go hide
I'm sure to a timid little pajama boy like you, everything sounds "scared."

It's clear he has had his ass kicked by old white Men often
I've never seen someone so scared of whites as he is and the
best part is he can't vote for Kama:)
 
Last edited:
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez would have been considered moderate voices in Truman's time. Today they are considered "far left" because the Democratic Party (not to mention the Republican Party) have moved so far to the right. Now it has taken the smallest steps back to the left with a proposal that (as pointed out in post 3) could have come from the most rock-ribbed of right-wingers.

Is your point that only communism can produce general prosperity?
Lying and gaslighting only works on stupid people. Beat it, kook.
 
Back
Top