New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

MLK Lieutenant refused to participate in Selma March.

She refused to march across the bridge when she found out GW Bush was a participant.
Her words:
“The Selma movement was about non-violence and peace and democracy and George Bush stands for just the opposite. For violence and war and stolen elections… and George Bush’s administration had people tortured.”

http://www.mediaite.com/online/mlk-...lma-anniversary-march-because-bush-was-there/

RACIST WITCH

She must have missed Ferguson riots
Troops deaths doubled under Θ surge
LMFAO.........Θ droned American teen w/out due process--yeah no torture there, just DEAD and how bout all them innocent dead___________


Wonder what she thought about MLK bedding all those sista's down.......
PRASE DA LARD
 
btw

Maybe she knew the bridge is named after a CONFEDERATE GENERAL........☻
 
RACIST WITCH

She must have missed Ferguson riots
Troops deaths doubled under Θ surge
LMFAO.........Θ droned American teen w/out due process--yeah no torture there, just DEAD and how bout all them innocent dead___________


Wonder what she thought about MLK bedding all those sista's down.......
PRASE DA LARD
Hey you senile old fool....stop HIJACKING this thread. this is about the Selma March. For someone who bitches about others highjacking threads, you're the worst offender on PJ. Then you whine..."WHERE ARE THE MODS"?? And Dawg.l..isn't it unchristian to say "Praise Da Lard??? And yes....it's Praise...not Prase. Drinking much tonight, Dawgy?
 
She refused to march across the bridge when she found out GW Bush was a participant.
Her words:
“The Selma movement was about non-violence and peace and democracy and George Bush stands for just the opposite. For violence and war and stolen elections… and George Bush’s administration had people tortured.”

http://www.mediaite.com/online/mlk-...lma-anniversary-march-because-bush-was-there/
What a pathetic old bat. Funny I never heard of her, as I was quite interested in the civil rights movement and the participants during that time.
 
What a pathetic old bat. Funny I never heard of her, as I was quite interested in the civil rights movement and the participants during that time.
Looking in the mirror, Charcat? BTW what's wrong with what she is stating....that the march isn't about warmongering and torture...something GW Bush promoted?
 
For her to've skipped the march on account of the GWBs, suggested that she doesn't get what MLK Jr. is all about, and probably never did.

Whatever we my think of the GWBs, it's a counteproductive stretch to pin the label of "racist" on them. Nevertheless, MLK Jr. would've hailed the attendance of anyone - the more "racist", the better.
 
Looking in the mirror, Charcat? BTW what's wrong with what she is stating....that the march isn't about warmongering and torture...something GW Bush promoted?
The gathering wasn't to celebrate warmongering and torture, so why shouldn't GWB be present?
 
Looking in the mirror, Charcat? BTW what's wrong with what she is stating....that the march isn't about warmongering and torture...something GW Bush promoted?
Hey, right of free assembly. If this woman feels that her hatred of Bush is worth more than her support of what Selma stood for, then more power to her.
 
For her to've skipped the march on account of the GWBs, suggested that she doesn't get what MLK Jr. is all about, and probably never did.

Whatever we my think of the GWBs, it's a counteproductive stretch to pin the label of "racist" on them. Nevertheless, MLK Jr. would've hailed the attendance of anyone - the more "racist", the better.
I agree. I think she was just trying to get attention, and obviously she missed the whole meaning of what MLK stood for.
 
I agree. I think she was just trying to get attention, and obviously she missed the whole meaning of what MLK stood for.

Call me old - which I am - but I think it's way to easy these days, for people of whatever "stripe", to find a microphone.
 
Ooh ooh! One more thing. What do we suppose MLK Jr. would think about one of his own, being described as a Lieutenant?
 
Call me old - which I am - but I think it's way to easy these days, for people of whatever "stripe", to find a microphone.
I don't mind people having a microphone. My issue is that, just because that person has a microphone, that we are obligated to listen to her. I have an opinion of her not unlike the opinion I have for most intolerant liberals. But I still defend her right to be that way.
 
I don't mind people having a microphone. My issue is that, just because that person has a microphone, that we are obligated to listen to her. I have an opinion of her not unlike the opinion I have for most intolerant liberals. But I still defend her right to be that way.

I specifically noted that MY microphone meme doesn't distinguish between "intolerant liberals" and anyone else. Be advised as well, that you needn't listen to any microphone you don't want to. My concern with the microphone, is that it tends to over value some people's silliness. There's enough real shit going down in the world these days, that we don't need it clouded with silliness.
 
BINGO! you get it... unfortunately the apparently near brain dead OP in glee to make a pointless point, doesn't get it at all

;)

For her to've skipped the march on account of the GWBs, suggested that she doesn't get what MLK Jr. is all about, and probably never did.

Whatever we my think of the GWBs, it's a counteproductive stretch to pin the label of "racist" on them. Nevertheless, MLK Jr. would've hailed the attendance of anyone - the more "racist", the better.
 
As to this issue of race in America, most of us are convinced that our side is right and the other one's wrong. Unfortunately, there's IS no "right side" and no "wrong side". The right side, is an amalgamation of the positive aspects of both sides.

It's inexcusably self-indulgent of us, especially we white people, to insist upon our binary view.
 
She refused to march across the bridge when she found out GW Bush was a participant.
Her words:
“The Selma movement was about non-violence and peace and democracy and George Bush stands for just the opposite. For violence and war and stolen elections… and George Bush’s administration had people tortured.”

http://www.mediaite.com/online/mlk-...lma-anniversary-march-because-bush-was-there/

Pure childishness on her part.
She missed a huge commemorative event just because someone she doesn't like was there.
She cut off her nose to spite her face.
Unbelievable.
I hope she lives to regret that stupid decision.
 
As to this issue of race in America, most of us are convinced that our side is right and the other one's wrong. Unfortunately, there's IS no "right side" and no "wrong side". The right side, is an amalgamation of the positive aspects of both sides.

It's inexcusably self-indulgent of us, especially we white people, to insist upon our binary view.
I really don't think there is a right and a wrong per se. I believe that racism is a closed-minded and counterproductive way of thinking, but it's also natural that people are culture-centric. My disagreement comes from the left's desire to to brow beat society into conformance. Violation of THEIR unofficial mandates result in summary sanction. No trial nor "innocent until proven guilty". Liberal thought police are EVERYTHING this nation was created to prevent.
 
The "left" and"right" on this one, are two peas in a pod. Each one is about little more than "defending her turf" from the other side. We - of both sides - decline to accept that, so there the black man sits in the middle, languishing and ignored.
 
Back
Top