New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

More bad news for Nunes and for Susan Rice haters

Spamature

President
Devin's flimflam meant to run interference for the FlimFlammer in Chief has put him in the hot seat and exonerated Rice.

CNN Exclusive: Classified docs contradict Nunes surveillance claims, GOP and Dem sources say

Washington (CNN)After a review of the same intelligence reports brought to light by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers and aides have so far found no evidence that Obama administration officials did anything unusual or illegal, multiple sources in both parties tell CNN.

Their private assessment contradicts President Donald Trump's allegations that former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice broke the law by requesting the "unmasking" of US individuals' identities. Trump had claimed the matter was a "massive story."

However, over the last week, several members and staff of the House and Senate intelligence committees have reviewed intelligence reports related to those requests at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.

One congressional intelligence source described the requests made by Rice as "normal and appropriate" for officials who serve in that role to the president.

And another source said there's "absolutely" no smoking gun in the reports, urging the White House to declassify them to make clear there was nothing alarming in the documents.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/p...contradicts-nunes-unmasking-claims/index.html
 
Apparently you are unaware that it is the Susan Rice continual and constant lies we hate.

And your post here shows you are fine with her lying.

That's just how you roll.
 
Devin's flimflam meant to run interference for the FlimFlammer in Chief has put him in the hot seat and exonerated Rice.

CNN Exclusive: Classified docs contradict Nunes surveillance claims, GOP and Dem sources say

Washington (CNN)After a review of the same intelligence reports brought to light by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers and aides have so far found no evidence that Obama administration officials did anything unusual or illegal, multiple sources in both parties tell CNN.

Their private assessment contradicts President Donald Trump's allegations that former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice broke the law by requesting the "unmasking" of US individuals' identities. Trump had claimed the matter was a "massive story."

However, over the last week, several members and staff of the House and Senate intelligence committees have reviewed intelligence reports related to those requests at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.

One congressional intelligence source described the requests made by Rice as "normal and appropriate" for officials who serve in that role to the president.

And another source said there's "absolutely" no smoking gun in the reports, urging the White House to declassify them to make clear there was nothing alarming in the documents.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/p...contradicts-nunes-unmasking-claims/index.html
LIAR DERKA DERKA LIAR LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE
You defend this makes you a troll
 
None of this answers the question of who fed those names to the Press? Since Susan Rice has no credibility perhaps she should testify before the committee.
 
Devin's flimflam meant to run interference for the FlimFlammer in Chief has put him in the hot seat and exonerated Rice.

CNN Exclusive: Classified docs contradict Nunes surveillance claims, GOP and Dem sources say

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/p...contradicts-nunes-unmasking-claims/index.html

CNN has "Classified" documents?

Does CNN have "Classified" documents clearance?

Is having "Classified" documents a crime?

Should CNN retract this statement and apologize to America for faking news to avoid investigation?
 
Apparently you are unaware that it is the Susan Rice continual and constant lies we hate.

And your post here shows you are fine with her lying.

That's just how you roll.
Obviously, your hatred of Rice has nothing to do with her supposedly lying continually and constantly. There's no evidence she does. And there's evidence that Trump is the most shameless liar of any major modern American politician, yet you don't hate him.

It's not about lying. It's about cultural allegiances. You perceive Trump as a member of your tribe, so you're pretty comfortable with his breathtaking dishonesty. You perceive a black, female liberal as being outside your tribe, so you're quick to assume she's lying if there's the slightest question about it, and quick to condemn her in the harshest terms on that basis.

Surely you can't even be fooling yourself about what really drives your hatred, can you?
 
What lying?
His entire ham handed scam attempt was a lie. He needs to testify and come clean now. He is going to lose his chance to turn state's evidence once the rest of the Trumpies start singing.
Remember:
The early song bird catches the worm of leniency.
 
Back
Top