No Impeachment

[Jen]

1. Regarding Benghazi. My belief is that the administration felt it needed to keep terrorism and al quaeda out of the "reasons" that Benghazi happened so they purged that from the news story before letting it out. As for responding correctly and sending aid to the people in Benghazi who requested it and for and asked for help, ........... I doubt anything can be proven.

2. Regarding IRS. If the President is involved in asking the IRS to target agencies that could hurt him, it was illegal, however there is no proof at this point that he did that.

3. The AP wiretaps and the appointments while Congress was still in session (that went around Congress approval).......... nothing illegal that I am aware of.

This President is corrupt, arrogant, and has perhaps broken the law. But without solid proof, there should be no impeachment. And nobody is talking. Nobody is naming him. And he knows nothing.

He should just sit down and shut up and do what he's told. But hey, that leaves him plenty of time for vacations and golf and hanging out with the movie stars...........isn't that what he wanted anyway?

 

[Saladin2]

:nono: tsk tsk. PF.

 

[MaryAnne]

1. Regarding Benghazi. My belief is that the administration felt it needed to keep terrorism and al quaeda out of the "reasons" that Benghazi happened so they purged that from the news story before letting it out. As for responding correctly and sending aid to the people in Benghazi who requested it and for and asked for help, ........... I doubt anything can be proven.

2. Regarding IRS. If the President is involved in asking the IRS to target agencies that could hurt him, it was illegal, however there is no proof at this point that he did that.

3. The AP wiretaps and the appointments while Congress was still in session (that went around Congress approval).......... nothing illegal that I am aware of.

This President is corrupt, arrogant, and has perhaps broken the law. But without solid proof, there should be no impeachment. And nobody is talking. Nobody is naming him. And he knows nothing.

He should just sit down and shut up and do what he's told. But hey, that leaves him plenty of time for vacations and golf and hanging out with the movie stars...........isn't that what he wanted anyway?

Jen,how many more of your made up facts do we have to read here?

 

[NightSwimmer]

Not bad advice, if it were taken in the appropriate context. Taking one's own good advice, however, is unfortunately all too rare.

He should just sit down and shut up...

 

[GordonGecko]

"perhaps has broken the law".....yet a "Constitution-lover" like Jen says she doesn't want an impeachment?!?!!??

 

[GordonGecko]

Jen,how many more of your made up facts do we have to read here?

Probably one more.....that Hillary "said" "What difference does it make?" in referring to the 4 deaths in Libya.

 

[MaryAnne]

Probably one more.....that Hillary "said" "What difference does it make?" in referring to the 4 deaths in Libya.

Hasn't she already posted that one?

 

[Jen]

Where in the Constitution does it say that when we THINK someone has broken the law we must impeach?
It doesn't say that, Gecko.

I believe that (in famous Clinton style) Obama will be able to cover his tracks enough that it won't be able to be proven that HE actually did something illegal. I do not want him impeached on probabilities.

It will be enough that he is seen for what he is and that his lame duck period starts right now. And I believe that will be done. He has harmed this country and he has led in the corruption. But the process of impeachment is one that we just should NOT have to put out the money for AND the thought of President Biden is abhorrent.

"perhaps has broken the law".....yet a "Constitution-lover" like Jen says she doesn't want an impeachment?!?!!??

 

[GordonGecko]

Where in the Constitution does it say that when we THINK someone has broken the law we must impeach?
It doesn't say that, Gecko.

Jen, a member of Congress swears an oath to "uphold the Constitution". Now given you think the evidence that the President is "guilty" is undeniable.....so must the even-more-in-the-know members of the US House.

Therefore it is their SWORN DUTY to bring up impeachment under Article Two, Section Four-

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."


As well....a PATRIOTIC American who believes in the Constitution should ALSO call for an impeachment if they believe a President is guilty of a crime, regardless of "how it will play out" (or especially "how it will play out for MY side").

 

[Jen]

Enjoy chasing your tail here, Gecko. I'm done playing your lil game.

Jen, a member of Congress swears an oath to "uphold the Constitution". Now given you think the evidence that the President is "guilty" is undeniable.....so must the even-more-in-the-know members of the US House.

Therefore it is their SWORN DUTY to bring up impeachment under Article Two, Section Four-

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."


As well....a PATRIOTIC American who believes in the Constitution should ALSO call for an impeachment if they believe a President is guilty of a crime, regardless of "how it will play out" (or especially "how it will play out for MY side").

 

[GordonGecko]

One more "game", Jen...

Imagine if I said in 2005..."I am firmly convinced there is enough evidence to show that George W. Bush raped a baby......but I don't want him impeached, becuase it just cost too much money and takes up too much time. Let's just wait for 2008."