New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Not a Tyrant

R

Randy71

Council Member
I'll be honest. I was very disappointed by the election results. I didn't want Hillary Clinton to win the Democrat nomination and I didn't want Donald Trump to win the Republican nomination. I wanted two different people to run for President.

But I can tell you about three people who were originally against Trump but now want him to win. Those three people are: myself, my cousin and a friend of mine. When Trump said that he can get prayer brought back to schools, I became his supporter. My cousin once called Trump 'The Devil', but after he took the time to re-examine things, he changed his mind.

I also like that Trump says that he'll help our vets if he wins. Our veterans fought and were prepared to die to maintain our freedom. Out of all of the people in the USA, our veterans deserve to be helped the most.

Yes, Trump has his shortcomings. Two of which are his temper and he loves to shoot his mouth off. Trump has his shortcomings but he isn't a tyrant like many people claim. My dad had a temper and he loved to shoot his mouth off but he certainly wasn't a tyrant. I'm getting sick of people comparing Trump to Adolf Hitler. Trump isn't another Hitler and people know it.

Trump also has other shortcomings but Hillary also has a bunch of shortcomings. Let's forget about the charges that she has been facing for a moment. Even if she had never faced charges, she still has her shortcomings. Two of which are that she is racist and she is a bully. Hillary admires Margaret Sanger enormously even though Sanger said that black people should be exterminated. That is racist. Many years ago, Hillary referred to some mentally challenged children as 'F****** retards'. She bullied sweet, innocent children. Children who were mentally challenged.

Both candidates have flaws. If Hillary wins, she will not be a better President than Trump. I'm not saying that Trump would be a better President than Hillary but he sure wouldn't be worse.
 
Sickofleft said:
It's a Dem tactic, every Republican is racist and a potential Hitler. She has nothing to run on, so this entire election is now about his "temperament".
Click to expand...
Get over it...Trump is a complete ass hole...That is his "temperament"
 
Randy71 said:
I'll be honest. I was very disappointed by the election results. I didn't want Hillary Clinton to win the Democrat nomination and I didn't want Donald Trump to win the Republican nomination. I wanted two different people to run for President.

But I can tell you about three people who were originally against Trump but now want him to win. Those three people are: myself, my cousin and a friend of mine. When Trump said that he can get prayer brought back to schools, I became his supporter. My cousin once called Trump 'The Devil', but after he took the time to re-examine things, he changed his mind.

I also like that Trump says that he'll help our vets if he wins. Our veterans fought and were prepared to die to maintain our freedom. Out of all of the people in the USA, our veterans deserve to be helped the most.

Yes, Trump has his shortcomings. Two of which are his temper and he loves to shoot his mouth off. Trump has his shortcomings but he isn't a tyrant like many people claim. My dad had a temper and he loved to shoot his mouth off but he certainly wasn't a tyrant. I'm getting sick of people comparing Trump to Adolf Hitler. Trump isn't another Hitler and people know it.

Trump also has other shortcomings but Hillary also has a bunch of shortcomings. Let's forget about the charges that she has been facing for a moment. Even if she had never faced charges, she still has her shortcomings. Two of which are that she is racist and she is a bully. Hillary admires Margaret Sanger enormously even though Sanger said that black people should be exterminated. That is racist. Many years ago, Hillary referred to some mentally challenged children as 'F****** retards'. She bullied sweet, innocent children. Children who were mentally challenged.

Both candidates have flaws. If Hillary wins, she will not be a better President than Trump. I'm not saying that Trump would be a better President than Hillary but he sure wouldn't be worse.
Click to expand...
Uh?...What charges are there against Hillary Clinton?..........Please explain
 
Randy71 said:
I'll be honest. I was very disappointed by the election results. I didn't want Hillary Clinton to win the Democrat nomination and I didn't want Donald Trump to win the Republican nomination. I wanted two different people to run for President.

But I can tell you about three people who were originally against Trump but now want him to win. Those three people are: myself, my cousin and a friend of mine. When Trump said that he can get prayer brought back to schools, I became his supporter. My cousin once called Trump 'The Devil', but after he took the time to re-examine things, he changed his mind.

I also like that Trump says that he'll help our vets if he wins. Our veterans fought and were prepared to die to maintain our freedom. Out of all of the people in the USA, our veterans deserve to be helped the most.

Yes, Trump has his shortcomings. Two of which are his temper and he loves to shoot his mouth off. Trump has his shortcomings but he isn't a tyrant like many people claim. My dad had a temper and he loved to shoot his mouth off but he certainly wasn't a tyrant. I'm getting sick of people comparing Trump to Adolf Hitler. Trump isn't another Hitler and people know it.

Trump also has other shortcomings but Hillary also has a bunch of shortcomings. Let's forget about the charges that she has been facing for a moment. Even if she had never faced charges, she still has her shortcomings. Two of which are that she is racist and she is a bully. Hillary admires Margaret Sanger enormously even though Sanger said that black people should be exterminated. That is racist. Many years ago, Hillary referred to some mentally challenged children as 'F****** retards'. She bullied sweet, innocent children. Children who were mentally challenged.

Both candidates have flaws. If Hillary wins, she will not be a better President than Trump. I'm not saying that Trump would be a better President than Hillary but he sure wouldn't be worse.
Click to expand...
As a counterpoint, my wife, mother, and I are three who were disappointed Clinton won, since we all voted for and supported Sanders. But, while Clinton isn't a very exciting nominee, she's a solid one. She's smart, vastly experienced, emotionally mature, politically realistic, well-meaning, and unusually honest for a major politician. Voting for her is like voting for her husband, Obama, Kerry, or Gore -- it's a vote for a standard-issue Democrat, which isn't such a bad thing at the end of the day. Trump, by comparison, is a truly chilling alternative. He's a vicious and mentally impaired demagogue selling a bizarre set of half-baked policies, stuck together by ignorance and hate. Maybe the only thing more alarming than the idea of a Trump presidency, is just what a large share of the American right threw their principles away to line up dutifully behind that nut-job.

As for the Trump-Hitler link, I see him as more of a Mussolini.

Anyway, check your facts on Sanger. She never said black people should be exterminated. That's just a lie right-wing opponents of birth control made up, content in the knowledge that the American right is so peopled with imbeciles that they'd never demand evidence for such a claim.

As for the claim that Clinton referred to mentally challenged children that way, what's your evidence?
 
Arkady said:
As a counterpoint, my wife, mother, and I are three who were disappointed Clinton won, since we all voted for and supported Sanders. But, while Clinton isn't a very exciting nominee, she's a solid one. She's smart, vastly experienced, emotionally mature, politically realistic, well-meaning, and unusually honest for a major politician. Voting for her is like voting for her husband, Obama, Kerry, or Gore -- it's a vote for a standard-issue Democrat, which isn't such a bad thing at the end of the day. Trump, by comparison, is a truly chilling alternative. He's a vicious and mentally impaired demagogue selling a bizarre set of half-baked policies, stuck together by ignorance and hate. Maybe the only thing more alarming than the idea of a Trump presidency, is just what a large share of the American right threw their principles away to line up dutifully behind that nut-job.

As for the Trump-Hitler link, I see him as more of a Mussolini.

Anyway, check your facts on Sanger. She never said black people should be exterminated. That's just a lie right-wing opponents of birth control made up, content in the knowledge that the American right is so peopled with imbeciles that they'd never demand evidence for such a claim.

As for the claim that Clinton referred to mentally challenged children that way, what's your evidence?
Click to expand...
Evidence?....They have none, but it sounds like it might be true to the Hillary haters so they believe it
 
this election is a crapshoot between the candidate we already know is defiant lawbreaker, and an unknown quantity who might turn out the same.
 
Randy71 said:
I'll be honest. I was very disappointed by the election results. I didn't want Hillary Clinton to win the Democrat nomination and I didn't want Donald Trump to win the Republican nomination. I wanted two different people to run for President.

But I can tell you about three people who were originally against Trump but now want him to win. Those three people are: myself, my cousin and a friend of mine. When Trump said that he can get prayer brought back to schools, I became his supporter. My cousin once called Trump 'The Devil', but after he took the time to re-examine things, he changed his mind.

I also like that Trump says that he'll help our vets if he wins. Our veterans fought and were prepared to die to maintain our freedom. Out of all of the people in the USA, our veterans deserve to be helped the most.

Yes, Trump has his shortcomings. Two of which are his temper and he loves to shoot his mouth off. Trump has his shortcomings but he isn't a tyrant like many people claim. My dad had a temper and he loved to shoot his mouth off but he certainly wasn't a tyrant. I'm getting sick of people comparing Trump to Adolf Hitler. Trump isn't another Hitler and people know it.

Trump also has other shortcomings but Hillary also has a bunch of shortcomings. Let's forget about the charges that she has been facing for a moment. Even if she had never faced charges, she still has her shortcomings. Two of which are that she is racist and she is a bully. Hillary admires Margaret Sanger enormously even though Sanger said that black people should be exterminated. That is racist. Many years ago, Hillary referred to some mentally challenged children as 'F****** retards'. She bullied sweet, innocent children. Children who were mentally challenged.

Both candidates have flaws. If Hillary wins, she will not be a better President than Trump. I'm not saying that Trump would be a better President than Hillary but he sure wouldn't be worse.
Click to expand...

There's a few things I like about Trump:

1) He's outside the establishment. All the right people, whether D or R, hate him.
2) He's superb, real success in the real world, building things and creating jobs.
3) He drives liberals insane.
4) I believe he is the closest we will ever get to to an non-partisan problem solver.
 
Arkady said:
As a counterpoint, my wife, mother, and I are three who were disappointed Clinton won, since we all voted for and supported Sanders. But, while Clinton isn't a very exciting nominee, she's a solid one. She's smart, vastly experienced, emotionally mature, politically realistic, well-meaning, and unusually honest for a major politician. Voting for her is like voting for her husband, Obama, Kerry, or Gore -- it's a vote for a standard-issue Democrat, which isn't such a bad thing at the end of the day. Trump, by comparison, is a truly chilling alternative. He's a vicious and mentally impaired demagogue selling a bizarre set of half-baked policies, stuck together by ignorance and hate. Maybe the only thing more alarming than the idea of a Trump presidency, is just what a large share of the American right threw their principles away to line up dutifully behind that nut-job.

As for the Trump-Hitler link, I see him as more of a Mussolini.

Anyway, check your facts on Sanger. She never said black people should be exterminated. That's just a lie right-wing opponents of birth control made up, content in the knowledge that the American right is so peopled with imbeciles that they'd never demand evidence for such a claim.

As for the claim that Clinton referred to mentally challenged children that way, what's your evidence?
Click to expand...


Sanger-addressing-the-KKK.jpg

I suppose you a "nice" version of Sangers cleaner race comments. What was her quotes in Comstockery referring too?
 
Drumcollie said:
View attachment 32654

I suppose you a "nice" version of Sangers cleaner race comments. What was her quotes in Comstockery referring too?
Click to expand...
What's amazing is the way there's this endless supply of deeply stupid right-wingers who will fall for OBVIOUSLY photshopped propaganda like that. I mean, if I hadn't met people like you online, I'd have been suspicious that such people could even exist.

Here's the original of the photo:

tumblr_mdgcbhQ3yH1rucyh4o1_1280.jpg


But even if you didn't know of the existence of the original, how incredibly stupid and gullible would you have to be NOT to spot the obviously doctored nature of the photo?! In the doctored photo, Sanger is the same distance from the lens as the woman whose hand disappears behind her skirt -- which defies physics. That extended hand would be buried in her body the way it's doctored. Meanwhile, who ever doctored the photograph held the target audience in such contempt that he didn't even bother to scale Sanger's photo appropriately -- she's an absolute giant in that picture -- towering over the figures around her -- even those closer to the camera who should appear larger. In order for the perspective to work, she'd have to be at least six and a half feet tall.

That's the part I find so funny -- not that there are right-wing meme factories that exist to churn out dishonest propaganda like this, but that those factories have properly figured out that there are people so credulous that they'll run with even the most obvious of fakes, so they needn't bother putting in an extra ten minutes to make the doctored photo convincing.

This isn't the first time the dimwits on this site have been taken in by obvious hoaxes like that. Remember this golden oldie?

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/juche-as-religion.77887/page-2#post-1240980

Or this one?

https://www.politicaljack.com/threa...minated-will-lose-in-2016.80289/#post-1297009

I ask in all seriousness: What the hell is wrong with you people? Did membership in the GOP come with a lobotomy or something? Jesus, it's like interacting with the brain-damaged.
 
Arkady said:
What's amazing is the way there's this endless supply of deeply stupid right-wingers who will fall for OBVIOUSLY photshopped propaganda like that. I mean, if I hadn't met people like you online, I'd have been suspicious that such people could even exist.

Here's the original of the photo:

tumblr_mdgcbhQ3yH1rucyh4o1_1280.jpg


But even if you didn't know of the existence of the original, how incredibly stupid and gullible would you have to be NOT to spot the obviously doctored nature of the photo?! In the doctored photo, Sanger is the same distance from the lens as the woman whose hand disappears behind her skirt -- which defies physics. That extended hand would be buried in her body the way it's doctored. Meanwhile, who ever doctored the photograph held the target audience in such contempt that he didn't even bother to scale Sanger's photo appropriately -- she's an absolute giant in that picture -- towering over the figures around her -- even those closer to the camera who should appear larger. In order for the perspective to work, she'd have to be at least six and a half feet tall.

That's the part I find so funny -- not that there are right-wing meme factories that exist to churn out dishonest propaganda like this, but that those factories have properly figured out that there are people so credulous that they'll run with even the most obvious of fakes, so they needn't bother putting in an extra ten minutes to make the doctored photo convincing.

This isn't the first time the dimwits on this site have been taken in by obvious hoaxes like that. Remember this golden oldie?

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/juche-as-religion.77887/page-2#post-1240980

Or this one?

https://www.politicaljack.com/threa...minated-will-lose-in-2016.80289/#post-1297009

I ask in all seriousness: What the hell is wrong with you people? Did membership in the GOP come with a lobotomy or something? Jesus, it's like interacting with the brain-damaged.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately in America there is a perct of voters that are complete idiots...The truth does not matter...Only "validation" of their own ignorance.The Alt Right provides that daily
 
Arkady said:
What's amazing is the way there's this endless supply of deeply stupid right-wingers who will fall for OBVIOUSLY photshopped propaganda like that. I mean, if I hadn't met people like you online, I'd have been suspicious that such people could even exist.

Here's the original of the photo:

tumblr_mdgcbhQ3yH1rucyh4o1_1280.jpg


But even if you didn't know of the existence of the original, how incredibly stupid and gullible would you have to be NOT to spot the obviously doctored nature of the photo?! In the doctored photo, Sanger is the same distance from the lens as the woman whose hand disappears behind her skirt -- which defies physics. That extended hand would be buried in her body the way it's doctored. Meanwhile, who ever doctored the photograph held the target audience in such contempt that he didn't even bother to scale Sanger's photo appropriately -- she's an absolute giant in that picture -- towering over the figures around her -- even those closer to the camera who should appear larger. In order for the perspective to work, she'd have to be at least six and a half feet tall.

That's the part I find so funny -- not that there are right-wing meme factories that exist to churn out dishonest propaganda like this, but that those factories have properly figured out that there are people so credulous that they'll run with even the most obvious of fakes, so they needn't bother putting in an extra ten minutes to make the doctored photo convincing.

This isn't the first time the dimwits on this site have been taken in by obvious hoaxes like that. Remember this golden oldie?

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/juche-as-religion.77887/page-2#post-1240980

Or this one?

https://www.politicaljack.com/threa...minated-will-lose-in-2016.80289/#post-1297009

I ask in all seriousness: What the hell is wrong with you people? Did membership in the GOP come with a lobotomy or something? Jesus, it's like interacting with the brain-damaged.
Click to expand...

what so now your the Sanger expert? What was your take on Comstockery? Who has done the most extensive study on Sanger...I am sure that's where you get your info. I know how easy it is to want to go to your fantasy land where sanger was just being so good by killing babies...but her process was for the unfit under educated and it's the reason why the majority of aborted babies to this day are black.

Facts...they sure suck in your little democratic world. Welcome to you.
 
Drumcollie said:
what so now your the Sanger expert?
Click to expand...

No. I've never studied her in any detail. I simply have a functioning BS detector, so the minute I looked at that very obvious fake photo, I knew it wasn't authentic. You'd have to be an absolute imbecile not to have seen that. So, I knew a quick Google image search would turn up the original, which it did.

I'd like to provide you some advice here, but in all honesty I don't know what to advise. It's not like there's some procedure I can urge on you to prevent you from humiliating yourself this way in the future -- some set of steps you could go through to avoid being taken in this way. The truth is, I'm not following any such procedure myself. Obvious fakes are simply obvious to me at a glance. If they aren't to you, how can I bring you up to speed, mentally?
I don't know. I suspect that it isn't so much that you're stupid, but rather that your brain is crippled by hate. You're so ready to believe the worst about anyone you perceive as being "on the other side," that you'll fall for anything, no matter how obviously faked. The hate is shutting down even the level of bullshit detection we should reasonably expect of someone with your limited mental resources. Without finding some way to turn the volume down on your hate, I expect you to keep making the same kinds of humiliating errors again and again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top