New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

NOW Protest Rush

Old Ridge Runner

Old Ridge Runner

Mayor
http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/18/seven-women-protest-rush-for-nows-big-day-of-protest-video/

Seven women participated in the National Organization for Women’s day of protest against Rush Limbaugh in front of Limbaugh’s D.C. affiliate WMAL, Friday.

NOW’s national protest day had been in the works since April 19, when the women’s advocacy group launched their “Enough Rush” campaign.

Pairing with media watchdog Media Matters for America NOW is targeting local affiliates and local advertisers, Friday’s demonstration was touted as the group’s big demonstration of opposition to Limbaugh with affiliates across the country participating in protests.

NOW has had Limbaugh in their crosshairs for nearly two decades, and they renewed their effort to get Limbaugh off the air as a response to the radio host’slate February insult of contraception activist Sandra Fluke.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/18/s...-nows-big-day-of-protest-video/#ixzz1vPJ64Wlr
Click to expand...

This shows you how relivence the National Organization of Women is. Rush's comments on Fluke took place back in February and it takes this nitwit group of women almost four months to organize seven women to protest Rush's comments. It also shows how idiotic the left is and how intelligent American women are.
 
That's funny. I read the title, and I thought you were telling us to protest Rush Limbaugh now.

NOW protest Rush! But what you're saying is the National Organization of Women is protesting Rush.

Since NOW is a singular noun, as the National Organization of Women, it should read "NOW protests Rush."
 
Patrick said:
That's funny. I read the title, and I thought you were telling us to protest Rush Limbaugh now.

NOW protest Rush! But what you're saying is the National Organization of Women is protesting Rush.

Since NOW is a singular noun, as the National Organization of Women, it should read "NOW protests Rush."
Click to expand...

Got you to look at the thread, didn't it?
 
Old Ridge Runner said:
Got you to look at the thread, didn't it?
Click to expand...

It certainly did. However, only seven women showed up? Not much of a protest. Sounds more like an embarrassment. If I were a member of a national organization, and we had arranged a protest and only seven people showed up, I certainly wouldn't publicize it. I'd be more likely to act like the event never happened.
 
Patrick said:
It certainly did. However, only seven women showed up? Not much of a protest. Sounds more like an embarrassment. If I were a member of a national organization, and we had arranged a protest and only seven people showed up, I certainly wouldn't publicize it. I'd be more likely to act like the event never happened.
Click to expand...

That was the reason I started this thread. When we were discussing Fluke's testimony someone brought up the fact that NOW had nothing to say about Rush's comments and wondered where they were. Apparently if this is the best that they can do, the women are tired of these people and are not showing up.
 
Uhuh.... Its called keeping the message going. And you and the Daily Caller are doing just that... well done!
 
We can rest assured that the angry white men in right wing American have their fingers on the pulse of American women!
 
Several years ago a dear friend found herself being victimized by her husband. After several years of marriage, he began cheating, beating her up, not paying any of the household bills. He backed the car into her. And he raped her. She had two small kids and worked as a part time school lunch cafeteria worker. She earned 90 dollars a week. She had no idea how to get help getting away from him. I was sitting at her dining room table with her when she called a local chapter of NOW to see if they could steer her in a direction. She explained that she was being physically/sexually abused and needed a bit of advice or a reference for help. The woman on the other end of the phone said, "That's not what we do."

A few years ago durinig the Super Bowl, the Tim Tebow and his mom commercial aired. It was reputed to be an anti-abortion commercial, and NOW already had their leg hairs in a knot over it before the thing even aired. So the commercial airs, no mention whatsoever of abortion, choosing life, nothing. In the ad, Tebow's mother talks about having almost lost him twice. Tebow attempts to tackle his mom but falls flat, while she is not touched. NOW released a statement claiming that this commercial advocated violence against women.
That same night, the Snickers ad with Betty White premiered. Basically, Betty, eightysomething year old Betty is tackled and slammed hard into the mud by a man. Not a word from NOW about that one, though.

If you want to run a NOW chapter but don't want to spread the proabortion propaganda, they won't have you.

I'm glad the Daily Caller ran this story. Reporting such a small turnout shows other women that NOW is just becoming more and more irrelevent.
 
NOW struck their deal with the Devil during "Slick" Willies' two terms. "Mum" would be the word regarding any and all of his transgressions as long as Clinton promoted and aided in the passage of legislation NOW wanted, ergo the VAWA, where the male is automatically judged guilty and the woman can make whatever charges, whenever, and no attempts will be made to verify their veracity. This in a supposed nation of equals. Barack, we have to assume, however swishes both ways, having his cake and eating it, too.
 
gigi said:
Several years ago a dear friend found herself being victimized by her husband. After several years of marriage, he began cheating, beating her up, not paying any of the household bills. He backed the car into her. And he raped her. She had two small kids and worked as a part time school lunch cafeteria worker. She earned 90 dollars a week. She had no idea how to get help getting away from him. I was sitting at her dining room table with her when she called a local chapter of NOW to see if they could steer her in a direction. She explained that she was being physically/sexually abused and needed a bit of advice or a reference for help. The woman on the other end of the phone said, "That's not what we do."
Click to expand...

And the significance of that is???? Calling the RNC would have gotten you the same answer. So would calling Promise Keepers. Organizations have different missions. Not everyone within an organization knows where to send someone who needs related but different services.

So what is your point here?

A few years ago durinig the Super Bowl, the Tim Tebow and his mom commercial aired. It was reputed to be an anti-abortion commercial, and NOW already had their leg hairs in a knot over it before the thing even aired. So the commercial airs, no mention whatsoever of abortion, choosing life, nothing. In the ad, Tebow's mother talks about having almost lost him twice.
Click to expand...
Hmm and this is not related to reproductive rights issues how? Seriously you aren't that naive.
 
GordonGecko said:
Sure, I mean who better to know women....than a guy like Rush who's been married FOUR times??? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The fact remains that it took nearly four months for a leftist women's organization (that use to be in the forefront of women's issues) to rally seven women to protest rush on and outdated news item. These people have outlives their usefulness.
 
ORR, I can think of no one I want more as "The GOP's representative to women"....

than Rush Limbaugh.

How can we help??? :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top