New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

NRA vs Bloomberg

JuliefromOhio

President
Supporting Member
the NRA devoted their Jan, 2014 issue of America's 1st FREEDOM warning their members about Michael Bloomberg. they believe that once Bloomberg leaves office, that he'll devote ALL of his time and money to getting gun safety laws enacted. (I sure hope he does.)

they should be afraid as Bloomberg's Net Worth is $31 B as of September 2013. that's B as in billions.
go for it, Mayor, and you cons better send in your 10 bucks to the NRA pronto.
 
the NRA devoted their Jan, 2014 issue of America's 1st FREEDOM warning their members about Michael Bloomberg. they believe that once Bloomberg leaves office, that he'll devote ALL of his time and money to getting gun safety laws enacted. (I sure hope he does.)

they should be afraid as Bloomberg's Net Worth is $31 B as of September 2013. that's B as in billions.
go for it, Mayor, and you cons better send in your 10 bucks to the NRA pronto.
gun safety to this Klown means confiscation.
 
the NRA devoted their Jan, 2014 issue of America's 1st FREEDOM warning their members about Michael Bloomberg. they believe that once Bloomberg leaves office, that he'll devote ALL of his time and money to getting gun safety laws enacted. (I sure hope he does.)

they should be afraid as Bloomberg's Net Worth is $31 B as of September 2013. that's B as in billions.
go for it, Mayor, and you cons better send in your 10 bucks to the NRA pronto.

well, libs do ♥ rich people after-all.............$31 B.......will not last long and I betcha he will NOT spend that $$$$$$$$$$ on your wet dreams.........☻
 
...so enforcement of a 20-year old Law is wrong, in what way exactly?

"...New York City had the five-round law in the books for about 20 years..."
The point I was making is that confiscation does happen. Another thing highlighted by this, is that without registration, this course of action wouldn't be possible. That's why we fight registration tooth and nail; if they get registration, it may take a few years, but they'll try to confiscate them sooner or later.
 
well, lefty won't believe that. It's on Foxnews. ...

...what's not to believe? - the report is that they were sending out letters for owners to demonstrate compliance with a 20-year old Law - there is NO mention of any guns being confiscated.

...Law enforcement only applies to Laws you happen to agree with?
 
The point I was making is that confiscation does happen. Another thing highlighted by this, is that without registration, this course of action wouldn't be possible. That's why we fight registration tooth and nail; if they get registration, it may take a few years, but they'll try to confiscate them sooner or later.

...please show me where guns were confiscated - there is no mention of any guns being taken away from anyone. Again, they were enforcing a Law that has been in the books for 20-years - if it were so bad, why hasn't the NRA spent millions to have it overturned by now?
 
The point I was making is that confiscation does happen. Another thing highlighted by this, is that without registration, this course of action wouldn't be possible. That's why we fight registration tooth and nail; if they get registration, it may take a few years, but they'll try to confiscate them sooner or later.

it's why gang-bangers do NOT register their weapons☻
 
...what's not to believe? - the report is that they were sending out letters for owners to demonstrate compliance with a 20-year old Law - there is NO mention of any guns being confiscated.

...Law enforcement only applies to Laws you happen to agree with?
Excuse me? What does "immediately surrender them" sound like to you? And it said the law has been on the books since 2010; 3 yrs, not 20.....
 
Back
Top