New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Obama Dusting Off Bush's WMD Lies As Pretext For War in Syria

I guess now we know where Saddam's WMDs were all along and of course Bush knew it.

ref:

U.S. says chemical weapons would be Syria ‘red line’ after Assad regime caught moving ‘components’

Associated Press | Dec 3, 2012

WASHINGTON — U.S. and allied intelligence have detected Syrian movement of chemical weapons components in recent days, a senior U.S. defence official said Monday, as the Obama administration again warned the Assad regime against using them.

A senior defence official said intelligence officials have detected activity around more than one of Syria’s chemical weapons sites in the last week. The defense official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about intelligence matters.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, in Prague for meetings with Czech officials, reiterated President Barack Obama’s declaration that Syrian action on chemical weapons was a “red line” for the United States that would prompt action.

“We have made our views very clear: This is a red line for the United States,” Clinton told reporters. “I’m not going to telegraph in any specifics what we would do in the event of credible evidence that the Assad regime has resorted to using chemical weapons against their own people. But suffice it to say, we are certainly planning to take action if that eventuality were to occur.”

Congrats AmericAA-, you just re-elected Bush on steroids.

FORWARD
 
Baloney! There is no reason to go to war in Syria--boots on the ground war--so it won't happen. If Assad really DOES chemically attack his own people, the UN would back an intervention involving drones and other air assets. Your comparision is not remotely accurate.

Really, the lengths you go to to confuse a Liberal with a Neocon are extraordinary.
 
Of course when GIs boots are on the ground in Syria your excuse will be the following..

A: Denial
B: Indifference
C: Blame
D: Acceptance and that you believed it was a good thing all along. (except the Bush part)

Baloney! There is no reason to go to war in Syria--boots on the ground war--so it won't happen. If Assad really DOES chemically attack his own people, the UN would back an intervention involving drones and other air assets. Your comparision is not remotely accurate.

Really, the lengths you go to to confuse a Liberal with a Neocon are extraordinary.

EDIT: Of course the dirty little not-so-secret is Boots are already on the ground training their al-quada rebel allies.

REF:

NATO commandos in illegal special ops in Syria — RT
rt.com/news/stratfor-syria-secret-wikileaks-989/
Mar 6, 2012 – Undercover NATO troops are already in Syria despite denials from their ... US officials “said without saying that SOF [special operation forces] ...
 
Dude, it's all over mainstream news that Obama is accusing Syria of WMDs and Hillary drawing red lines in the sand.

How many trooops did Obama deploy to Libya? Sorry, but the war mongering idiots are on the other side of the political spectrum.
 
Back
Top