New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Oh the transparency!! Hillary as guilty as potus of hiding the truth

Dino

Russian Asset
WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, State Department officials said, and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record.
Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.

It was only two months ago, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, that Mrs. Clinton’s advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails and decided which ones to turn over to the State Department. All told, 55,000 pages of emails were given to the department. Mrs. Clinton stepped down from the secretary’s post in early 2013.

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.
“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.
A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/u...il-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?_r=0
 
I'm sure all the bootlickers here are totally cool with this, but I'm wondering if it came to light that all of, say, Dick Cheney's correspondence about Iraq had gone through his personal email account, would it still be okey-dokey?
 
I'm sure all the bootlickers here are totally cool with this, but I'm wondering if it came to light that all of, say, Dick Cheney's correspondence about Iraq had gone through his personal email account, would it still be okey-dokey?
Wow, could you imagine?

Even if the bootlickers are cool with it, it will be interesting to see if enough laws were broken to nix any chance she ever had of higher office. Hope so!
 
I'm sure all the bootlickers here are totally cool with this, but I'm wondering if it came to light that all of, say, Dick Cheney's correspondence about Iraq had gone through his personal email account, would it still be okey-dokey?

Nope they wouldn't, Do you think if Condi Rice had been caught with documents in her socks like Sandy Berger did leaving the National Archives would she have gotten off?

The Clintons are just dirt bags I don't understand why people fail to grasp that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, could you imagine?

Even if the bootlickers are cool with it, it will be interesting to see if enough laws were broken to nix any chance she ever had of higher office. Hope so!

I hope so, too, but I doubt it. After all, if she broke too many laws, the Clintonian solution is to simply change the laws. Problem solved!
 
I'm sure all the bootlickers here are totally cool with this, but I'm wondering if it came to light that all of, say, Dick Cheney's correspondence about Iraq had gone through his personal email account, would it still be okey-dokey?

There's no practical difference between what Dick "the Dick" did, and what Sec. of State Clinton did. Neither's correspondence was available to the public in "real time". The type of account used in this instance, is irrelevant.

There was a time not so long ago...the Li'l George Era?...when the Fox/GOP got this. Nowadays, they're simply playing to the ignorance of their fools...imagine that.
 
There's no practical difference between what Dick "the Dick" did, and what Sec. of State Clinton did. Neither's correspondence was available to the public in "real time". The type of account used in this instance, is irrelevant.

There was a time not so long ago...the Li'l George Era?...when the Fox/GOP got this. Nowadays, they're simply playing to the ignorance of their fools...imagine that.
It absolutely is relevant.

First Hillary's aides at State are not allowed to determine which emails deserve public scrutiny and which do not. That's only the availability angle of her work emails.

But it gets more troubling than that. The level of security for Hotmail, yahoo mail, gmail or some such is certainly lower than that found on government servers. This put American strategy and personnel decisions at far more risk than was necessary. It's downright criminal in fact.
 
It absolutely is relevant.

First Hillary's aides at State are not allowed to determine which emails deserve public scrutiny and which do not. That's only the availability angle of her work emails.

But it gets more troubling than that. The level of security for Hotmail, yahoo mail, gmail or some such is certainly lower than that found on government servers. This put American strategy and personnel decisions at far more risk than was necessary. It's downright criminal in fact.

Your desperation to turn this into a hate angle, will come to naught. That's all that really matters to me.
 
Your desperation to turn this into a hate angle, will come to naught. That's all that really matters to me.
We'll see about that. It's not up to me at this point (unfortunately for you and your side), it's up to the lawyers.
 
There's no practical difference between what Dick "the Dick" did, and what Sec. of State Clinton did. Neither's correspondence was available to the public in "real time". The type of account used in this instance, is irrelevant.

There was a time not so long ago...the Li'l George Era?...when the Fox/GOP got this. Nowadays, they're simply playing to the ignorance of their fools...imagine that.

See what I mean? The bootlickers are totally cool with Hillary using her personal email account for official state business in order to skirt the laws requiring retention of official communications. As predicted...
 
See what I mean? The bootlickers are totally cool with Hillary using her personal email account for official state business in order to skirt the laws requiring retention of official communications. As predicted...
Once a crook, always a crook. That's all that needs to be said about Hillary.
 
There's no practical difference between what Dick "the Dick" did, and what Sec. of State Clinton did. Neither's correspondence was available to the public in "real time". The type of account used in this instance, is irrelevant.

There was a time not so long ago...the Li'l George Era?...when the Fox/GOP got this. Nowadays, they're simply playing to the ignorance of their fools...imagine that.

Yet, Petraeus just plead Guilty on Federal charges of doing the same as Hillary did.....
 
Once a crook, always a crook. That's all that needs to be said about Hillary.

Hell, she lost her very First job for being unethical...........nothing has changed about her since............
 
Back
Top