Old Fashioned Poll
- Thread starter Citizen
- Start date
Citizen
Council Member
You should go read some of the replies given in the post I referred to. Simply amazing IMHO
G
Greenridgeman
Guest
It might be argued that in the long run, the German VOLK did win.
Sometimes a leveling is what is needed, just burn off the old, the new springs up.
Like I hope to do to pastures any day now.
I'd say Germany is economically and politically stronger than any of the "victors", as of today.
Sometimes a leveling is what is needed, just burn off the old, the new springs up.
Like I hope to do to pastures any day now.
I'd say Germany is economically and politically stronger than any of the "victors", as of today.
Citizen
Council Member
Days
Commentator
I knew absolutely zero about this stuff walking onto the fray. I brushed up on it when the zionista clan in botf went nuts on me after I defended Lorie... what no one ever read proper was what I actually wrote, which basically was this, Lorie's point is moot, this whole argument is stupid.
Now, after some brief study, I think I can make some observations on what the holocaust denial argument is all about. Actually there is no holocaust denial, per se... that's the label the zionists place on the opposing politics. What is really happening there is simple: the zionists invaded Palestine using the "death camps" of the nazis as a premise for their actions. The zionists really stunk up the place, they invaded in the same style that the Huns invaded the old Roman Empire... it was straight forward kill, push out, take over tactics. So this gave rise to anti-zionist propaganda; not to be confused with anti-semite propagandda.
Basically, the anti-zionist propaganda revisited the whole UN action that arbitrarily cut out some land in Palestine and gave it to the zionists. When you look back at that action you discover that the zionists were pushing for this real hard beginning around 1900 in England. at the end of World War I, a guy named Rothschild secured an agreement with Britain that promised him a tract of land in Palestine for his zionist movement. The zionists are the political arm of the illuminatti. The name of the agreement was the Balfour Agreement. But the Balfour Agreement was not put in motion until the end of World War II... as a sort of consolation for the holocaust. Here's the kicker: the holocaust and earlier oppression of the jews - dating back to around 1900 again - was all instigated by the Illuminatti/zionists as a means of securing the land in Palestine. Even the wars themselves were started by the Illuminatti. Hitler was a bastard grandson of a Rothschild. British bankers put the guy in power, not German bankers!
Anyhoo, the small part of the story is the holocaust denial which actually was more like holocaust revisionists... and what you have there is just the anti-zionists trying to cut through all the hype and propaganda that was used to justify securing the land in Palestine. If you go back and look at it, precious little land was appropriated to the zionists, but it was the beach head they needed to launch their invasion, it was a purely military operation, which is to say, it was a stinking army with tanks, not any settlers, those came behind the army. It was much more straight forward than what happened in the New World with native Americans, it was a military invasion.
Now, as for the details that get argued, that just gets you lost in the sauce. The "death camps" were really work camps. Guess who owned and operated them? the Illuminatti. Auschwitz was a fully owned corporate subsidiary of New Jersey Exxon aka the Rockefellers; who also made all kinds of war materials for the nazis and shipped them over on the Hamburg/Amerika shipping line which Averill Harriman took out of mothballs from WWI and set Prescott Bush as CEO. In 1942 the Senate wrote and passed the "Trading with the enemy Act" expressly to shut them down. So, you see, Wall Street bankers are really the Illuminatti and they wage war according to an Illuminatti design put together at the close of the 19th century that called for three, count 'em, three world wars. The final world war is set to take place in the middle east with Iran backed by Russia. That's why all this saber rattling is coming out of Great Britain, the home of the political arm of the Illuminatti.
I learned all that on the internet, but guess what, it is historically accurate. Google any part of it, you will see that I did a pretty good job of piecing together the jigsaw puzzle and all the puzzle pieces check out. Now, understand this part of it; there's a political arm of the richest bankers on the planet that owns and operates all the media/press on the planet... directly or indirectly ... so there's a non stop feed of propaganda coming out to smokescreen this picture. You are not supposed to think that Palestine was invaded by a military machine, you are supposed to think that it was poor jews on foot who went there in poverty looking for a future... which it was, except they took up residence right behind the military invasion, even stealing the same houses built and lived in by the Palestinians.
Now, after some brief study, I think I can make some observations on what the holocaust denial argument is all about. Actually there is no holocaust denial, per se... that's the label the zionists place on the opposing politics. What is really happening there is simple: the zionists invaded Palestine using the "death camps" of the nazis as a premise for their actions. The zionists really stunk up the place, they invaded in the same style that the Huns invaded the old Roman Empire... it was straight forward kill, push out, take over tactics. So this gave rise to anti-zionist propaganda; not to be confused with anti-semite propagandda.
Basically, the anti-zionist propaganda revisited the whole UN action that arbitrarily cut out some land in Palestine and gave it to the zionists. When you look back at that action you discover that the zionists were pushing for this real hard beginning around 1900 in England. at the end of World War I, a guy named Rothschild secured an agreement with Britain that promised him a tract of land in Palestine for his zionist movement. The zionists are the political arm of the illuminatti. The name of the agreement was the Balfour Agreement. But the Balfour Agreement was not put in motion until the end of World War II... as a sort of consolation for the holocaust. Here's the kicker: the holocaust and earlier oppression of the jews - dating back to around 1900 again - was all instigated by the Illuminatti/zionists as a means of securing the land in Palestine. Even the wars themselves were started by the Illuminatti. Hitler was a bastard grandson of a Rothschild. British bankers put the guy in power, not German bankers!
Anyhoo, the small part of the story is the holocaust denial which actually was more like holocaust revisionists... and what you have there is just the anti-zionists trying to cut through all the hype and propaganda that was used to justify securing the land in Palestine. If you go back and look at it, precious little land was appropriated to the zionists, but it was the beach head they needed to launch their invasion, it was a purely military operation, which is to say, it was a stinking army with tanks, not any settlers, those came behind the army. It was much more straight forward than what happened in the New World with native Americans, it was a military invasion.
Now, as for the details that get argued, that just gets you lost in the sauce. The "death camps" were really work camps. Guess who owned and operated them? the Illuminatti. Auschwitz was a fully owned corporate subsidiary of New Jersey Exxon aka the Rockefellers; who also made all kinds of war materials for the nazis and shipped them over on the Hamburg/Amerika shipping line which Averill Harriman took out of mothballs from WWI and set Prescott Bush as CEO. In 1942 the Senate wrote and passed the "Trading with the enemy Act" expressly to shut them down. So, you see, Wall Street bankers are really the Illuminatti and they wage war according to an Illuminatti design put together at the close of the 19th century that called for three, count 'em, three world wars. The final world war is set to take place in the middle east with Iran backed by Russia. That's why all this saber rattling is coming out of Great Britain, the home of the political arm of the Illuminatti.
I learned all that on the internet, but guess what, it is historically accurate. Google any part of it, you will see that I did a pretty good job of piecing together the jigsaw puzzle and all the puzzle pieces check out. Now, understand this part of it; there's a political arm of the richest bankers on the planet that owns and operates all the media/press on the planet... directly or indirectly ... so there's a non stop feed of propaganda coming out to smokescreen this picture. You are not supposed to think that Palestine was invaded by a military machine, you are supposed to think that it was poor jews on foot who went there in poverty looking for a future... which it was, except they took up residence right behind the military invasion, even stealing the same houses built and lived in by the Palestinians.
Queen Titania
Senator
Days is correct, why oh why would it be made illegal in Europe to 'deny' otherwise ? But here is another link for you to ignore Citizen
http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/RassArch/PRdebunk/PRdebunk1.html
It is part of the writings of Paul Rassinier who was the first to say that there were no gas chambers in the camps which he was sent too. The beginning is his aweful experience in two camps. He of all people had no reason to defend the Third Reich he suffered ill health for the rest of his life after his treatment at their hands. He died in the 60's. But as he said all camps German and French and ect were the same as each other. He also said 'Isn't the truth atrocious enough ?' He had said that after his terriblr experiences, when he went home, having a little son, he would never speak of said experiences but ......he was so worried by the gas chambers stories that he felt he must speak out ...anyway, I know you will ignore it as you have ignored all other links but here he is, a Pacifist Socialist who paid dearly for his belief in our inherent goodness. .
http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/RassArch/PRdebunk/PRdebunk1.html
It is part of the writings of Paul Rassinier who was the first to say that there were no gas chambers in the camps which he was sent too. The beginning is his aweful experience in two camps. He of all people had no reason to defend the Third Reich he suffered ill health for the rest of his life after his treatment at their hands. He died in the 60's. But as he said all camps German and French and ect were the same as each other. He also said 'Isn't the truth atrocious enough ?' He had said that after his terriblr experiences, when he went home, having a little son, he would never speak of said experiences but ......he was so worried by the gas chambers stories that he felt he must speak out ...anyway, I know you will ignore it as you have ignored all other links but here he is, a Pacifist Socialist who paid dearly for his belief in our inherent goodness. .
Citizen
Council Member
I didn't ignore them but I'm not into revisionest historians, I'll go by what our troops at the time found said.
Latest posts
-
-
Trumpie swine squeezing Ukraine on Starshield again- Latest: georgephillip
-