I rarely know what the hell you are saying.
For the layman.
These new gun law regs, and old regs for that matter are aimed at law abiding citizens.
They exempt criminals.
How you may ask?
Because criminals not only will not abide by these laws nor do they give a rats ass.
So, how do you "enforce these regs against "criminals"?
You see, criminals as defined, are the ones doing all the "crimes" in this country.
And contrary to liberal thinking criminals do not register there weapons. And criminals woud never ever, ever buy from a legal gun dealership. See what I am saying???
BTW I am FOR the ban on assault weapons.
To bad criminals are not.
straw men buy guns, with or without a background check, and sell them on the street, ship them to Mexican cartels, etc..
"Enforcement"
Well,you FX, you say "enforcement" What about enforcement?
"Like if a gun owner breaks any of these gun laws, we do whatever the law calls us to do" "Is that good with you FX"?
Yah, cept I aint talken bout legal gunowners.
Ya know what I am saying?
Neither do most gun owners. That's what turns them into unprosecuted felons.
These new gun law regs, and old regs for that matter are aimed at law abiding citizens.
They exempt criminals.
How you may ask?
Because criminals not only will not abide by these laws nor do they give a rats ass.
So, how do you "enforce these regs against "criminals"?
That was the dumbest contortion I've ever seen. Did it occur to you that your analysis applies to every law on the books? According to your logic, all laws are useless because criminals don't obey them.
Brilliant observation. Let's not even try to enforce any of them.
It's truly amazing the ideas brought forth by some on the right.
You have it exactly right...Murderers don't "care" about the "law"...so there shouldn't be any laws against murder.
A cleverly worded slogan trumps rational thought with these fruitcakes every time. Common sense is neither as common, nor as sensible as it's reputation would imply.
These new gun law regs, and old regs for that matter are aimed at law abiding citizens.
They exempt criminals.
How you may ask?
Because criminals not only will not abide by these laws nor do they give a rats ass.
So, how do you "enforce these regs against "criminals"?
That was the dumbest contortion I've ever seen. Did it occur to you that your analysis applies to every law on the books? According to your logic, all laws are useless because criminals don't obey them.
Brilliant observation. Let's not even try to enforce any of them.
Nope.
What I am asking is,
How do you enforce the current laws against criminals