New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Pattern Developing

Just in the last few days, we seem to be finding a pattern. People who went on MSNBC and CNN claiming to have seen evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump Campaign when under Oath admit, they saw nothing of the kind. Clapper was the first, compare his testimony to what he stated on CNN.

Now this woman, a former Obama defense official Evelyn Farkas who had to admit what she said on TV was bullshit.

Lawmakers keyed in on an appearance Farkas made on MSNBC on March 2, 2017, in which she urged intelligence community bureaucrats to disseminate within the government and potentially even leak to media any incriminating information they had about Trump or his aides.


“I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama administration] people who left…[that] it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy,” Farkas said.

Farkas, who served in the Obama administration as the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia from 2012 through 2015, also claimed that administration officials appointed by Trump might even destroy evidence of alleged collusion if they “found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff’s dealing with Russians.”

They might “try to compromise those sources and methods,” Farkas alleged in the MSNBC interview. “And we would no longer have access to that intelligence.”

“Not enough was coming out into the open and I knew there was more,” Farkas claimed.


Farkas-I-Didnt-Know-Anything.jpg


But Farkas sang a different tone under oath when questioned by lawmakers about what she actually “knew” about collusion.

“Why don’t we go back to that sentence that I just asked you about. It says ‘the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their staff dealing with Russians,” Gowdy said. “Well, how would you know what the U.S. government knew at that point? You didn’t work for it, did you?”

“I didn’t,” said Farkas, a former mid-level Russia analyst who left the federal government in 2015.

“Then how did you know?” Gowdy responded.

“I didn’t know anything,” Farkas said.

“Did you have information connecting the Trump campaign to the hack of the DNC?” Gowdy asked.

“No,” Farkas admitted.

“So when you say, ‘We knew,’ the reality is you knew nothing,” Gowdy asked later during the deposition.

“Correct,” Farkas responded.

Gowdy didn’t stop there.

“So when you say ‘knew,’ what you really meant was felt?” he asked.

“Correct,” Farkas answered.

“You didn’t know anything?” Gowdy continued.

“That’s correct,” Farkas responded.

Farkas, a Democrat, is currently running for Congress in New York’s 17th district.


Of course,:rolleyes: she is running for Congress.. of course, she is ...
 
Just in the last few days, we seem to be finding a pattern. People who went on MSNBC and CNN claiming to have seen evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump Campaign when under Oath admit, they saw nothing of the kind. Clapper was the first, compare his testimony to what he stated on CNN.

Now this woman, a former Obama defense official Evelyn Farkas who had to admit what she said on TV was bullshit.

Lawmakers keyed in on an appearance Farkas made on MSNBC on March 2, 2017, in which she urged intelligence community bureaucrats to disseminate within the government and potentially even leak to media any incriminating information they had about Trump or his aides.


“I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama administration] people who left…[that] it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy,” Farkas said.

Farkas, who served in the Obama administration as the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia from 2012 through 2015, also claimed that administration officials appointed by Trump might even destroy evidence of alleged collusion if they “found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff’s dealing with Russians.”

They might “try to compromise those sources and methods,” Farkas alleged in the MSNBC interview. “And we would no longer have access to that intelligence.”

“Not enough was coming out into the open and I knew there was more,” Farkas claimed.


Farkas-I-Didnt-Know-Anything.jpg


But Farkas sang a different tone under oath when questioned by lawmakers about what she actually “knew” about collusion.

“Why don’t we go back to that sentence that I just asked you about. It says ‘the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their staff dealing with Russians,” Gowdy said. “Well, how would you know what the U.S. government knew at that point? You didn’t work for it, did you?”

“I didn’t,” said Farkas, a former mid-level Russia analyst who left the federal government in 2015.

“Then how did you know?” Gowdy responded.

“I didn’t know anything,” Farkas said.

“Did you have information connecting the Trump campaign to the hack of the DNC?” Gowdy asked.

“No,” Farkas admitted.

“So when you say, ‘We knew,’ the reality is you knew nothing,” Gowdy asked later during the deposition.

“Correct,” Farkas responded.

Gowdy didn’t stop there.

“So when you say ‘knew,’ what you really meant was felt?” he asked.

“Correct,” Farkas answered.

“You didn’t know anything?” Gowdy continued.

“That’s correct,” Farkas responded.

Farkas, a Democrat, is currently running for Congress in New York’s 17th district.


Of course,:rolleyes: she is running for Congress.. of course, she is ...
She’d rather claim she knew nothing than admit the source of leaks and lies that came out of the administration.
That doesn’t mean they still need a good housecleaning, removing the remnants of the deep state from all Republican administrations.
She’s another hate driven rumor monger who will surely win her election and then take office where she’ll (somehow) be worthy of “respect” as an “elected official”.
Yuck
 
“We choose truth over facts.”... Joe Biden

So, facts are, there NEVER was ANYONE with knowledge or proof of ANY type of collusion with Russia on the part of Trump OR his staff.

But the Dems 'felt' there was, that was their 'truth', and they believe their 'truth' over the actual 'facts'.

Deplorable.
 
Back
Top